Search, save and rate AI tools people shared in chats. Local catalogue, any model or none.
Nothing to run from here
Tokenomics Overview is installed from its publisher's own source and answers where it runs, so this marketplace is not in the path of a single call. There is no address here to send one to, and a panel that pretended otherwise would be showing you an answer we made up. Install it and call it from your own client — the Installation tab has the entry for each one.
97/100
trust score
29
downloads a day
local
runs on your machine
124
downloads in 30d
What it does
Unofficial MCP server for AI tokenomics: Big-T notation, cache metrics, levers, FOCUS 1.5 AI.
Quickstart
# 1 — add it to Claude Code
claude mcp add --scope user tokenomics-overview-mcp '--' npx -y tokenomics-overview-mcp
# 2 — ask your agent for something these tools do
# get_framework_info, search_framework, list_capabilities and 33 more
Tokenomics Overview costs nothing on mcprush: there is no plan to choose here, no cap to set and nothing mcprush can bill you for.
Publishernot claimed
AAAll 3 servers
aaronmsoto3 servers
2 categories
Collected from a public index. Nobody has claimed this account, so nothing here was written by its author — claim it if it is yours.
Installation
Where are you running it?
Every route below installs the same thing and ends at the same approval screen. This one runs on your machine: your client starts Tokenomics Overview as a process under your own user, with your files and your network, so the tool surface below is what it can do to your computer rather than to a server somewhere else. Its scan result is on the Security tab — read the surface before you approve it.
Claude Codedeclared by this listing
This is a public server: you run it yourself and this marketplace is not in the path. You need Node.js — the current LTS (24) is the safe choice; npx comes with it. Claude Code registers it in one command; --scope user makes it available in every project. The '--' is in quotes so that PowerShell passes it on.
claude mcp add --scope user tokenomics-overview-mcp '--' npx -y tokenomics-overview-mcpReconnect, or start a new session, and the tools appear in the model’s tool list.
Free on mcprush, and it runs from its publisher’s own package: this marketplace is not in the path, so there is no key of ours to hold and no card to add.
What it asks of you
Nothing is required, but it can take TOKENOMICS_MCP_DATA (Override the bundled data artifact directory (defaults to the packaged data/tokenomics).) if you want to set it.
What it writes
One config entry your client uses to start the process locally. A local server runs with your file system and your network, which is why it is priced without metering.
What you approve
36 tools, with what each one reads, writes and reaches shown before you agree — the same list on every route above. Read the tool surface.
Tool surface
What the model actually sees. Descriptions are diffed on every release — see version history.
Read from its source code. A server that builds its tool list when it starts can list more tools than this.
Start here. Returns the framework's structure (entity counts), the data version/crawl date/license, and how to navigate this server's tools. No parameters.
No parameter schema on file.
Ranked keyword search over every entity (capabilities, KPIs, personas, principles, phases, domains, technology categories, maturity levels, scopes). Returns slug + uri per hit. Feed the slug to get_kpis(slug: …), or pass it as capability: <slug> to…
| Parameter | Type | Required | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| query | string | yes | Keywords, e.g. 'unallocated spend tagging' |
| entity_types | array | no | Restrict to these entity types (default: all) |
| limit | integer | no | — |
| cursor | string | no | Opaque cursor from a previous call |
All … capabilities (slug, title, domain, one-line summary), optionally filtered by domain and/or persona (both take a slug, e.g. domain="understand-usage-and-cost", persona="finance"). The framework does not assign capabilities to phases, so there is deliberately no phase filter. Default limit…
| Parameter | Type | Required | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| domain | string | no | Domain slug, e.g. 'understand-usage-and-cost' |
| persona | string | no | Persona slug, e.g. 'finance' |
| limit | integer | no | — |
| cursor | string | no | — |
One capability's content, section-selectable via include to control size. Default include is [summary, definition] (~1-2k tokens). Approximate extra cost per section: maturity ~2.5k tokens, activities ~3k (filter with persona), kpis ~1k, headline_groups/inputs_outputs <1k; requesting ALL…
| Parameter | Type | Required | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| capability | string | yes | Capability slug, e.g. 'allocation' |
| include | array | no | Sections to return (default [summary, definition]) |
| persona | string | no | — |
EXPERIMENTAL (FINOPS_MCP_EXPERIMENTAL): The discrete items parsed from a capability's Crawl/Walk/Run maturity assessment. IMPORTANT: these are assessment CHARACTERISTICS (rubric states an assessor checks for), not official to-do steps — an unofficial parsing of official prose (official:false). At…
| Parameter | Type | Required | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| capability | string | yes | Capability slug |
| maturity | string | no | One level; omit for all three official levels |
| level | string | no | — |
The official FinOps Framework maturity assessment prose for a capability, verbatim, at one level (crawl|walk|run) or all three. This is the Foundation's published assessment text, not a parsed breakdown.
| Parameter | Type | Required | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| capability | string | yes | Capability slug, e.g. 'allocation' |
| level | string | no | One level; omit for all three official levels |
Full KPI records: description, formula + candidate data sources (present for the … KPIs the site details in capability-page popups), official related capabilities, and where each is featured. Look up one KPI with slug, or filter by capability and/or featured_only — filters combine (AND), so a…
| Parameter | Type | Required | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| slug | string | no | — |
| capability | string | no | — |
| featured_only | boolean | no | — |
| limit | integer | no | — |
| cursor | string | no | — |
For one capability, the official maturity assessment text at each level between current and target — evidence to look for when maturing. To get one level's assessment text on its own (or all three at once), use get_maturity_assessment instead.
| Parameter | Type | Required | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| capability | string | yes | Capability slug, e.g. 'allocation' |
| current_level | string | yes | — |
| target_level | string | yes | — |
With persona: every capability that persona works in, WITH that persona's activity bullets inline (one call answers 'what does X do across the framework'). With capability: every persona active in it, with activities. With neither: the full persona index (slugs, categories) — use it to…
| Parameter | Type | Required | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| capability | string | no | Capability slug, e.g. 'allocation' |
| persona | string | no | Persona slug, e.g. 'finance' |
Full rendered markdown for entity types that have no dedicated tool. Required param: entity_type (principles | phases | domains | technology-categories | scopes | persona). Collections return whole (they are small); entity_type 'persona' also needs slug. For capabilities use get_capability;…
| Parameter | Type | Required | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| entity_type | string | yes | — |
| slug | string | no | Required for entity_type 'persona'; ignored otherwise |
No parameter schema on file.
What changed between data versions of this server's crawled artifact (rolling window of the 20 most recent refreshes — the crawler caps the log at 20, so this tool covers the full retained history; the same data is at finops://framework/meta/changelog). Reflects crawl-to-crawl differences in…
| Parameter | Type | Required | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| limit | integer | no | — |
No parameter schema on file.
No parameter schema on file.
No parameter schema on file.
No parameter schema on file.
No parameter schema on file.
No parameter schema on file.
No parameter schema on file.
No parameter schema on file.
No parameter schema on file.
No parameter schema on file.
No parameter schema on file.
No parameter schema on file.
No parameter schema on file.
No parameter schema on file.
No parameter schema on file.
No parameter schema on file.
No parameter schema on file.
No parameter schema on file.
No parameter schema on file.
No parameter schema on file.
No parameter schema on file.
No parameter schema on file.
No parameter schema on file.
No parameter schema on file.
Free
$0 forever
- Every tool, no call limit
- No card, and mcprush charges nothing for it
- Source published under MIT
- Runs on your machine — nothing of it reaches our gateway
- Nothing to cap, because mcprush bills nothing
What counts against your monthly calls
| Tool | Unit | Calls used | Out of the allowance |
|---|
Nothing here is billable: mcprush charges nothing to install Tokenomics Overview or to call it, at any volume.
Call allowance · this installenforced at the gateway
Monthly allowance, in calls
—
—
Alert at 80% · then the tool returns a normal MCP error
Used this month: —
ATrust score 97 / 100
Release 0.2.1 · scanned 28 Oct 2026
Two independent axes, because powerful and malicious are different questions. The grade is threat only. The capability level is blast radius, and it is never a penalty on the grade — it is priced as one subtract-only term in the score, where you can see it.
Threat score100
Client score97
Findings0 threat · 0 capability
Capabilitymoderate
Coveragesource
Verificationsource
Surface digest7085dd4f663661a555000f33aab4d5833a9da42a7978dd2b104419eb44aa27d6
Score vectorthreat 100 → client 97
| Term | Level | What it prices | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
| capability-exposure | moderate | capability blast radius (moderate) — client exposure if the model is manipulated | −3 |
| verification-discount | source | publisher verification (provenance) — cryptographic build provenance ties the artifact to its source | −0 |
| coverage-honesty | source | inspection depth (source) — how much of the target the scan could see | −0 |
score = clamp(round(threatScore − E_cap − E_ver − E_cov), 0, 100). No model, no opinion, no network call at scoring time: the same methodology version against the same bytes always produces this number, and every line above is a field of the report rather than a summary of it.
What the scan could actually read
A grade is only as meaningful as its coverage, so the scanner publishes its own depth before it publishes its result.
Tool surfaceread
Implementation sourceread
Package metadataread
Live transportnot available
Tools were statically extracted from the published source (24 recovered), not enumerated from a running server. Tool-poisoning, Unicode-smuggling, capability and toxic-flow analysis ran on this inferred surface, but a mis-parsed registration could be missed or mis-attributed, so tool-derived findings are capped below “confirmed”. To grade the real runtime surface, scan the running server: --command "npx -y <package>".
4 of the 24 recovered tools are registered only when !opts.experimental is false (dist/servers/tokenomics/tools.js:1019) — typically when a key or option is configured. They are part of the server's surface and were analysed; a server started without that configuration exposes only the other 20.
Capability — what it could do if the model were manipulated
Tags derived from each tool’s schema and the implementation, not from what the tool calls itself. moderate is the level these add up to.
20 tools are registered unconditionally · 4 more only when !opts.experimental is false (dist/servers/tokenomics/tools.js:1019) — typically when a key or option is configured. All 24 are in the table below and were analysed; the conditional ones are marked.
| Tool | Capability tags | Why the tag was assigned |
|---|---|---|
| get_tokenomics_info | sensitive-source | sensitive-source: keyword "get_token" |
| list_documents | no tags | |
| get_document | no tags | |
| list_layers | no tags | |
| get_layer | no tags | |
| get_bigt_notation | no tags | |
| get_bigt_class | no tags | |
| list_levers | no tags | |
| get_lever | no tags | |
| list_metrics | no tags | |
| get_metric | no tags | |
| calculate_cache_metrics | no tags | |
| get_provider_cache_snapshot | no tags | |
| list_personas | no tags | |
| get_persona | no tags | |
| list_value_categories | no tags | |
| define_term | no tags | |
| get_focus_ai_tracker | no tags | |
| get_crosslinks | no tags | |
| search_tokenomics | no tags | |
| get_crosswalk conditional | no tags | |
| list_curriculum_modules conditional | no tags | |
| get_curriculum_module conditional | no tags | |
| get_numbers_register conditional | no tags |
Toxic-flow graph
The lethal trifecta, checked as a graph rather than as a checklist: untrusted input, a sensitive source and an external sink have to meet before there is a path worth worrying about.
The public result for this release does not print the flow graph, so there is nothing to show here. That is not the same as "no paths were found": what the scan did read is above, under coverage.
Supply chain and provenance
Integrityfirst-seen
Surface digest7085dd4f663661a5
Scanned2026-10-28
This is the first scan of this surface here, so there is nothing yet to compare it against.
Every result on this tab comes from one deterministic pass over the published package — offline, rule by rule, and auditable line by line above. Same methodology version, same bytes, same score.
Release history
Always latest — the install command names no version, so it installs the newest release when it runs; the current release on file is 0.2.1. Pin a release below and the command asks for exactly that one.
0.2.1
undated
latestNo release note was published with this version.
—
no reviews yet
Who can review
One review per account, from a signed-in account that does not publish this listing. Nothing else is asked — you can say what you think before you install it. Publishers can reply once per review, and a review can be edited or deleted by whoever wrote it.
Sign in to write one
Any signed-in account that does not publish Tokenomics Overview can review it, once — before installing it or after. A review from an account that has installed it is marked as one.
No reviews yet
Nobody has reviewed this listing. The rating on the card is the mean of the reviews written here and nothing else, so there is no rating until somebody writes the first — which takes a signed-in account that does not publish it, and nothing else.