Query Markup Documents - On-device hybrid search for markdown files with BM25, vector search, and LLM reranking
CLI is installed from its publisher's own source and answers where it runs, so this marketplace is not in the path of a single call. There is no address here to send one to, and a panel that pretended otherwise would be showing you an answer we made up. Install it and call it from your own client — the Installation tab has the entry for each one.
What it does
Cross-tool decision memory for AI coding agents: search your decision graph, check changes over MCP.
Quickstart
# 1 — add it to Claude Code
claude mcp add --scope user aligndottech-cli-mcp '--' npx -y @aligndottech/cli
# 2 — ask your agent for something these tools do
# align_check_alignment, align_ask, align_search and 5 more
CLI costs nothing on mcprush: there is no plan to choose here, no cap to set and nothing mcprush can bill you for.
Where are you running it?
Every route below installs the same thing and ends at the same approval screen. This one runs on your machine: your client starts CLI as a process under your own user, with your files and your network, so the tool surface below is what it can do to your computer rather than to a server somewhere else. Its scan result is on the Security tab — read the surface before you approve it.
This is a public server: you run it yourself and this marketplace is not in the path. You need Node.js — the current LTS (24) is the safe choice; npx comes with it. Claude Code registers it in one command; --scope user makes it available in every project. The '--' is in quotes so that PowerShell passes it on.
claude mcp add --scope user aligndottech-cli-mcp '--' npx -y @aligndottech/cliReconnect, or start a new session, and the tools appear in the model’s tool list.
One config entry your client uses to start the process locally. A local server runs with your file system and your network, which is why it is priced without metering.
8 tools, with what each one reads, writes and reaches shown before you agree — the same list on every route above. Read the tool surface.
Tool surface
What the model actually sees. Descriptions are diffed on every release — see version history.
BEFORE writing or changing significant code, call this with the proposed change to surface prior decisions across ALL the user's tools (Slack, Jira, GitHub, git) that it conflicts with or relates to. A "conflict" status means the change opposes a past decision - stop and confirm with the user…
| Parameter | Type | Required | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| diff | string | yes | Git diff or description of proposed change |
| context | string | no | Additional context (branch name, PR title) |
Ask a natural language question and get answers from the decision graph. Use this when the user asks "how", "what was decided about", or any question about past decisions.
| Parameter | Type | Required | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| question | string | yes | Natural language question about decisions (e.g. "do we use postgres", "how does auth work", "what was decided about caching") |
| limit | number | no | Max answers (default: 8) |
Alias of align_ask: the same search of the decision graph, taking the text as query. Kept for callers that already use this name; prefer align_ask.
| Parameter | Type | Required | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| query | string | yes | Search query |
| limit | number | no | Max results (default: 8) |
Capture a decision from ANY tool - a Slack thread, Jira ticket, GitHub PR, Confluence/doc URL, or raw text. Call this whenever a decision gets made in conversation so the cross-tool decision graph stays current and relationships across tools can be detected.
| Parameter | Type | Required | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| input | string | yes | URL or text content of the decision to capture |
Check if code or configuration has drifted from a specific decision
| Parameter | Type | Required | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| decision_id | string | yes | ID of the decision to check against |
| content | string | yes | Code or config content to compare |
| source_type | string | no | Type of content: code, config, documentation |
Get the upstream and downstream impact of a decision
| Parameter | Type | Required | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| decision_id | string | yes | Decision ID to analyze |
List conflicts and contradictions in the decision graph. conflict_count is the exact total; the links list holds one page, and a message says when there are more than it shows - never present the listed links as the complete set unless they match conflict_count.
No parameter schema on file.
BEFORE editing a file or module, call this to learn what was already decided about it across all the user's connected tools (not just code) - surfacing the cross-tool context an agent would otherwise miss.
| Parameter | Type | Required | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| file_path | string | yes | File path or module name |
| context | string | no | Additional code context |
- Every tool, no call limit
- No card, and mcprush charges nothing for it
- Source published under MIT
- Runs on your machine — nothing of it reaches our gateway
- Nothing to cap, because mcprush bills nothing
What counts against your monthly calls
| Tool | Unit | Calls used | Out of the allowance |
|---|
Nothing here is billable: mcprush charges nothing to install CLI or to call it, at any volume.
Two independent axes, because powerful and malicious are different questions. The grade is threat only. The capability level is blast radius, and it is never a penalty on the grade — it is priced as one subtract-only term in the score, where you can see it.
| Term | Level | What it prices | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
| capability-exposure | high | capability blast radius (high) — client exposure if the model is manipulated | −6 |
| verification-discount | source | publisher verification (provenance) — cryptographic build provenance ties the artifact to its source | −0 |
| coverage-honesty | source | inspection depth (source) — how much of the target the scan could see | −0 |
What the scan could actually read
A grade is only as meaningful as its coverage, so the scanner publishes its own depth before it publishes its result.
Tools were statically extracted from the published source (8 recovered), not enumerated from a running server. Tool-poisoning, Unicode-smuggling, capability and toxic-flow analysis ran on this inferred surface, but a mis-parsed registration could be missed or mis-attributed, so tool-derived findings are capped below “confirmed”. To grade the real runtime surface, scan the running server: --command "npx -y <package>".
dist/commands/connect-agents.d.ts (1 KB) was not read: over the file-count budget.
Capability — what it could do if the model were manipulated
Tags derived from each tool’s schema and the implementation, not from what the tool calls itself. high is the level these add up to.
| Tool | Capability tags | Why the tag was assigned |
|---|---|---|
| align_check_alignment | no tags | |
| align_ask | no tags | |
| align_search | no tags | |
| align_capture | state-write | state-write: declares readOnlyHint: false |
| align_check_drift | state-write | state-write: declares readOnlyHint: false |
| align_get_impact | no tags | |
| align_get_conflicts | no tags | |
| align_get_related_decisions | no tags |
Toxic-flow graph
The lethal trifecta, checked as a graph rather than as a checklist: untrusted input, a sensitive source and an external sink have to meet before there is a path worth worrying about.
The public result for this release does not print the flow graph, so there is nothing to show here. That is not the same as "no paths were found": what the scan did read is above, under coverage.
Supply chain and provenance
This is the first scan of this surface here, so there is nothing yet to compare it against.
Every result on this tab comes from one deterministic pass over the published package — offline, rule by rule, and auditable line by line above. Same methodology version, same bytes, same score.
Release history
Always latest — the install command names no version, so it installs the newest release when it runs; the current release on file is 0.54.0. Pin a release below and the command asks for exactly that one.
No release note was published with this version.
No release note was published with this version.
No release note was published with this version.
No release note was published with this version.
No release note was published with this version.
No release note was published with this version.
No release note was published with this version.
No release note was published with this version.
No release note was published with this version.
No release note was published with this version.
No release note was published with this version.
- The version this listing was on when mcprush began following its releases. The registry was not asked when it shipped, so this row carries no date.
One review per account, from a signed-in account that does not publish this listing. Nothing else is asked — you can say what you think before you install it. Publishers can reply once per review, and a review can be edited or deleted by whoever wrote it.
Any signed-in account that does not publish CLI can review it, once — before installing it or after. A review from an account that has installed it is marked as one.
Nobody has reviewed this listing. The rating on the card is the mean of the reviews written here and nothing else, so there is no rating until somebody writes the first — which takes a signed-in account that does not publish it, and nothing else.