Pack local or remote codebases into AI-friendly files that LLMs and coding agents can read or search
Nothing to run from here
gitgoblin is installed from its publisher's own source and answers where it runs, so this marketplace is not in the path of a single call. There is no address here to send one to, and a panel that pretended otherwise would be showing you an answer we made up. Install it and call it from your own client — the Installation tab has the entry for each one.
94/100
trust score
15
downloads a day
local
runs on your machine
413
downloads in 30d
What it does
Discover open-source repositories worth your time and evidence-backed contribution opportunities.
Quickstart
# 1 — add it to Claude Code
claude mcp add --scope user gitgoblin-mcp '--' npx -y @gitgoblin/mcp
# 2 — ask your agent for something these tools do
# discover_repositories, explain_repository, analyze_repository and 1 more
gitgoblin costs nothing on mcprush: there is no plan to choose here, no cap to set and nothing mcprush can bill you for.
Publishernot claimed
ANAll 2 servers
anandkaranubc2 servers
1 category
Collected from a public index. Nobody has claimed this account, so nothing here was written by its author — claim it if it is yours.
Installation
Where are you running it?
Every route below installs the same thing and ends at the same approval screen. This one runs on your machine: your client starts gitgoblin as a process under your own user, with your files and your network, so the tool surface below is what it can do to your computer rather than to a server somewhere else. Its scan result is on the Security tab — read the surface before you approve it.
Claude Codedeclared by this listing
This is a public server: you run it yourself and this marketplace is not in the path. You need Node.js — the current LTS (24) is the safe choice; npx comes with it. Claude Code registers it in one command; --scope user makes it available in every project. The '--' is in quotes so that PowerShell passes it on.
claude mcp add --scope user gitgoblin-mcp '--' npx -y @gitgoblin/mcpReconnect, or start a new session, and the tools appear in the model’s tool list.
Free on mcprush, and it runs from its publisher’s own package: this marketplace is not in the path, so there is no key of ours to hold and no card to add.
What it asks of you
Nothing is required, but it can take GITHUB_TOKEN (Optional GitHub token that can read public repositories. Raises rate limits from 60 to 5000 requests per hour and unlocks starter-issue data. A GitHub CLI login works too.) if you want to set it.
What it writes
One config entry your client uses to start the process locally. A local server runs with your file system and your network, which is why it is priced without metering.
What you approve
4 tools, with what each one reads, writes and reaches shown before you agree — the same list on every route above. Read the tool surface.
Tool surface
What the model actually sees. Descriptions are diffed on every release — see version history.
Read from its source code. A server that builds its tool list when it starts can list more tools than this.
Rank public GitHub repositories for a goal and explain why each one ranked where it did. Use it when someone wants to find open-source projects to contribute to, learn from, depend on, revive, or explore. Goals: …. Each result has a score (0 to 1, comparable within one goal only), the strongest…
| Parameter | Type | Required | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| goal | string | no | What you want from a repository (default contribute): …. |
| languages | array | no | Programming languages, up to three, for example ["typescript", "rust"]. |
| topics | array | no | GitHub topics every result must carry, for example ["cli"]. |
| keywords | array | no | Free-text words to search for in names and descriptions. |
| min_stars | integer | no | Minimum stars. The goal picks sensible bounds when omitted. |
| max_stars | integer | no | Maximum stars, useful to escape the famous projects. |
| pushed_within_days | integer | no | Only repositories pushed to in the last N days. |
| created_within_days | integer | no | Only repositories created in the last N days. |
| license | string | no | Required license as an SPDX id, for example mit or apache-2.0. |
| like | string | no | Find repositories similar to this one (owner/name) instead of searching by goal slices. |
| exclude_owners | array | no | Owners to skip. |
| include_archived | boolean | no | Keep archived repositories (default false). |
| include_forks | boolean | no | Keep forks (default false). |
| limit | integer | no | How many results, 1 to … (default 10). |
Show every discovery signal for one GitHub repository under a goal: activity, responsiveness, bus factor, newcomer friendliness, docs, maturity, popularity, usage, momentum and license, each with its value, its weight for the goal and the evidence behind it. Use it to understand or compare…
| Parameter | Type | Required | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| repository | string | yes | Repository as owner/name or a GitHub URL, for example BurntSushi/ripgrep. |
| goal | string | no | Goal to weigh the signals for (default contribute): …. |
Profile one repository and rank what an outside contributor could do there, with evidence for every item. The profile covers what the project is, how alive it is, how it treats outsiders, its contribution rules, the commands to install and test it, and its conventions. Opportunities include open…
| Parameter | Type | Required | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| repository | string | yes | Repository as owner/name or a GitHub URL, for example BurntSushi/ripgrep. |
| max_opportunities | integer | no | How many opportunities to return, 1 to … (default 10). |
| check_dependencies | boolean | no | Query OSV and package registries about dependencies (default true). |
| goal | string | no | Discovery goal used to contextualize the analysis (default contribute). |
Everything needed to start on one opportunity from analyze_repository: full summary, every piece of evidence with excerpts, the factors behind its score, files to read first, a step-by-step approach, acceptance criteria, the project's etiquette and rules, its install and test commands, and its…
No parameter schema on file.
Free
$0 forever
- Every tool, no call limit
- No card, and mcprush charges nothing for it
- Source published under MIT
- Runs on your machine — nothing of it reaches our gateway
- Nothing to cap, because mcprush bills nothing
What counts against your monthly calls
| Tool | Unit | Calls used | Out of the allowance |
|---|
Nothing here is billable: mcprush charges nothing to install gitgoblin or to call it, at any volume.
Call allowance · this installenforced at the gateway
Monthly allowance, in calls
—
—
Alert at 80% · then the tool returns a normal MCP error
Used this month: —
ATrust score 94 / 100
Release 0.1.7 · scanned 28 Oct 2026
Two independent axes, because powerful and malicious are different questions. The grade is threat only. The capability level is blast radius, and it is never a penalty on the grade — it is priced as one subtract-only term in the score, where you can see it.
Threat score100
Client score94
Findings2 threat · 0 capability
Capabilityhigh
Coveragesource
Verificationsource
Surface digest4f27b05336c9a201bef8c0fed323e5f9f3f51d539cf0145fd65c6fa79ff5616e
Score vectorthreat 100 → client 94
| Term | Level | What it prices | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
| capability-exposure | high | capability blast radius (high) — client exposure if the model is manipulated | −6 |
| verification-discount | source | publisher verification (provenance) — cryptographic build provenance ties the artifact to its source | −0 |
| coverage-honesty | source | inspection depth (source) — how much of the target the scan could see | −0 |
score = clamp(round(threatScore − E_cap − E_ver − E_cov), 0, 100). No model, no opinion, no network call at scoring time: the same methodology version against the same bytes always produces this number, and every line above is a field of the report rather than a summary of it.
What the scan could actually read
A grade is only as meaningful as its coverage, so the scanner publishes its own depth before it publishes its result.
Tool surfacenot available
Implementation sourceread
Package metadataread
Live transportnot available
No tools were enumerated, so prompt-injection, capability and toxic-flow analysis had no tool surface to inspect. To grade a package’s real runtime tools, scan the running server: --command "npx -y <package>".
Capability — what it could do if the model were manipulated
Tags derived from each tool’s schema and the implementation, not from what the tool calls itself. high is the level these add up to.
| Tool | Capability tags | Why the tag was assigned |
|---|---|---|
| No per-tool rows for this release — see the note below. | ||
can execute shell commands or code
Toxic-flow graph
The lethal trifecta, checked as a graph rather than as a checklist: untrusted input, a sensitive source and an external sink have to meet before there is a path worth worrying about.
The public result for this release does not print the flow graph, so there is nothing to show here. That is not the same as "no paths were found": what the scan did read is above, under coverage.
Supply chain and provenance
Integrityfirst-seen
Surface digest4f27b05336c9a201
Scanned2026-10-28
This is the first scan of this surface here, so there is nothing yet to compare it against.
Every result on this tab comes from one deterministic pass over the published package — offline, rule by rule, and auditable line by line above. Same methodology version, same bytes, same score.
Release history
Always latest — the install command names no version, so it installs the newest release when it runs; the current release on file is 0.1.7. Pin a release below and the command asks for exactly that one.
0.1.7
undated
latestNo release note was published with this version.
—
no reviews yet
Who can review
One review per account, from a signed-in account that does not publish this listing. Nothing else is asked — you can say what you think before you install it. Publishers can reply once per review, and a review can be edited or deleted by whoever wrote it.
Sign in to write one
Any signed-in account that does not publish gitgoblin can review it, once — before installing it or after. A review from an account that has installed it is marked as one.
No reviews yet
Nobody has reviewed this listing. The rating on the card is the mean of the reviews written here and nothing else, so there is no rating until somebody writes the first — which takes a signed-in account that does not publish it, and nothing else.