MCP server for 104.com.tw job search platform
List all available human expert evaluation offerings with pricing, tool names, and whether each issues an on-chain Taste content certificate. Free.
ArgumentsA call is made on an account: it counts against an allowance and the publisher sees it, which is why this one asks who you are first.
What it does
Expert review for AI agents. On-chain proof of human review.
Quickstart
# 1 — install (mcprush login holds a key from your dashboard)
npx mcprush@latest add taste-mcp
# 2 — ask your agent something
> Expert review for AI agents. On-chain proof of human review.
Taste is free: there is no plan to choose, no cap to set and nothing that can bill you.
Collected from a public index. Nobody has claimed this account, so nothing here was written by its author — claim it if it is yours.
Where are you running it?
Every route below installs the same thing and ends at the same approval screen. Nothing here runs on your machine — this server runs on the publisher’s own infrastructure behind our gateway, and what you install is the connection to it.
This is a public server: you run it yourself and this marketplace is not in the path. Claude Code registers it in one command.
claude mcp add --transport http taste-mcp https://api.humantaste.app/mcpReconnect, or start a new session, and the tools appear in the model’s tool list.
One config entry pointing at the gateway. The server itself runs on the publisher’s own infrastructure, so nothing from this listing executes on your machine.
20 tools, with what each one reads, writes and reaches shown before you agree — the same list on every route above. Read the tool surface.
Tool surface
What the model actually sees. Descriptions are diffed on every release — see version history.
List all available human expert evaluation offerings with pricing, tool names, and whether each issues an on-chain Taste content certificate. Free.
Takes no parameters.
Returns currently-available expert taglines (pseudonymous descriptions of the kinds of expertise on hand) plus the real-time count of online expert seats and estimated wait. Use this as a cheap pre-flight check before calling a paid tool. Taglines describe expertise kinds, not individuals: no per-expert PII is exposed. Free.
Takes no parameters.
Check the status of a previously submitted request. Returns the full structured deliverable once the expert (or order team) completes the work. Accepts a sessionId or an order reference code (think tank or illustration).
Takes no parameters.
Get a humantaste.app URL where a human can place a consult_domain_expert order from a browser (Connect MetaMask, pay $15 USDC on Base, session created). Use this when your MCP client has no wallet integration (Claude Desktop, generic chat UIs). The URL is pre-filled with the brief you pass in; the user just opens it, reviews, connects a wallet, and pays. Returns the payment URL and the price. Free
Takes no parameters.
Spend a free revision turn on a completed think tank order. Provide the reference code from your original order and describe the adjustments you want — the same team revisits the brief and returns an updated deliverable. Poll get_result with the reference code to retrieve it. Free: no payment required, the turn is included with your order.
Takes no parameters.
Spend a free revision turn on a completed illustration order. Provide the reference code from your original order and describe the adjustments you want — the same illustrator revisits the brief and returns an updated deliverable. Poll get_result with the reference code to retrieve it. Free: no payment required, the turn is included with your order.
Takes no parameters.
Have a vetted human expert verify whether an external source, project, or claim is trustworthy. Call when your output or planned action depends on an external claim you cannot independently verify (crypto project legitimacy, social media authenticity, source credibility, vendor due diligence). Returns verdict, red flags, positive signals, confidence score.
Takes no parameters.
Get a vetted human expert to review your AI-generated content — text, images, videos, social posts, audio, or any media — for hallucinations, factual errors, weak parts, and domain mistakes. Call before publishing, before forwarding to another agent, or before acting on the content. Returns verdict, issues found, suggested improvements. Approved outputs receive a Taste content certificate on-chain
Takes no parameters.
Audit your step-by-step reasoning for mid-chain errors before producing the final answer. Call when stakes are high and your chain has 3+ steps — humans catch wrong intermediate steps that final-output checks miss (right-looking answers built on broken intermediate logic). Returns per-step verdict, flagged errors, suggested corrections. Approved chains receive a Taste content certificate on-chain.
Takes no parameters.
Get a vetted human expert to review your AI-generated content — text, images, videos, social posts, audio, or any media — for cultural sensitivity, brand safety, derivative risks, and audience appeal before you publish. Call before social posts, marketing campaigns, content distribution, or anywhere public-facing. Returns verdict (safe / needs_changes / do_not_publish), flagged issues, fix suggest
Takes no parameters.
Get a real human matching your target demographic to rate and react to your content as a representative audience member. Call before A/B test commits, before ad spend, or before distribution decisions. Returns overall rating, criteria scores, qualitative feedback, comparison notes.
Takes no parameters.
Get an impartial human arbiter to decide whether a deliverable meets an agreed contract, or to settle disagreements between agents. Call when automated evaluation cannot determine quality, when two parties dispute fulfillment, or when subjective judgment is needed for contract assessment. Returns approve/reject verdict, reasoning, deliverable quality rating, contract alignment.
Takes no parameters.
Pause your workflow for explicit human approval before executing a high-stakes action. Call before any irreversible action — large spend, on-chain transaction, public content publish, customer-facing decision. Returns approved/denied + reasoning. Approvals can be enforced on-chain via the Taste Gatekeeper hook for ACP and ERC-8183 jobs.
Takes no parameters.
Verify a Taste content certificate on-chain. Call when consuming content from another source that claims to be human-reviewed — returns reviewer domain, date, offering, verdict, validity, and an evidence tier: "evidence-verified" certs carry the reviewer's EIP-712 verdict signature + their Human Passport score attestation (EAS on Base), independently checkable without trusting Taste. Free. Use to
Takes no parameters.
Convene a think tank — a curated team of vetted human experts runs a 30-minute working session on your idea, problem, or decision and returns synthesized directions, ideas with rationale, and recommended next steps. Returns a sessionId + referenceCode immediately — poll get_result with either when the team is done. Includes 1 free revision turn: call request_think_tank_revision with the code to as
Takes no parameters.
Convene a think tank — a curated team of vetted human experts runs a 60-minute working session on your idea, problem, or decision and returns synthesized directions, ideas with rationale, and recommended next steps. Returns a sessionId + referenceCode immediately — poll get_result with either when the team is done. Includes 2 free revision turns: call request_think_tank_revision with the code to a
Takes no parameters.
A vetted human in a named domain answers your question with first-hand knowledge. Pass `domain` to match an expert. Pass `parentSessionId` for follow-ups (cap 3). Returns answer, anonymised role, confidence, first-hand flag. Approved answers get an on-chain Taste cert. Listed domains: musician, cantor, writer, farmer, UX designer, Swedish archipelago resident, Stockholm local, Protestant priest, a
Takes no parameters.
Ask a vetted human a plain-text question and get a plain-text answer back, usually within 30 minutes. Call when you need a quick human take, gut check, or local/lived-experience answer a model cannot reliably give. No scoring, no verdict, no certificate — just a direct human response. Returns the human's answer, plus an optional note on who answered.
Takes no parameters.
Get a vetted human to review your implementation or project plan before you build. Call right after you draft a plan for a non-trivial task — a human catches wrong assumptions, missing steps, architectural dead-ends, and risky sequencing while changes are still cheap, before any code is written. Pass the plan, the goal it serves, and any constraints. Returns verdict (proceed / revise / rethink), r
Takes no parameters.
Get a vetted human engineer to review your code, architecture, and design decisions — not just style, but correctness, security, and whether the structure will hold up. Call before you treat code as done: payment flows, auth, data handling, or any logic where a subtle bug is costly. Pass the code (inline or a publicly accessible URL) and what it is meant to do. Returns verdict (approved / needs_ch
Takes no parameters.
- Every tool, no call limit
- No card, no account needed
- Source published under a licence you can read
- Runs on your machine — nothing of it reaches our gateway
- Nothing to cap, because nothing bills
What counts against your monthly calls
| Tool | Unit | Calls used | Out of the allowance |
|---|
Nothing here is billable. Taste costs nothing to install and nothing to call, at any volume.
Two independent axes, because powerful and malicious are different questions. The grade is threat only. The capability level is blast radius, and it is never a penalty on the grade — it is priced as one subtract-only term in the score, where you can see it.
This listing is a hosted endpoint: the publisher runs it and we connect to it. The scanner reads packages and source, and neither exists to read here, so there is no grade — not a withheld one, an unmeasured one. What can be checked instead is on Installation: what it asks to reach and what it writes.
Release history
Pinned to 2.0.0 — the install command below asks for that release. A pin is part of an install, so it is kept for this visit and written down when you install.
No release note was published with this version.
Only accounts with at least 50 real tool calls against this server in the last 90 days can post. Ratings are weighted by how much the reviewer actually uses it, and publishers can reply once per review.
Writing one takes an account with at least 50 real tool calls against Taste in the last 90 days. That is the whole gate — there is no other way to post, which is why the counts beside each review are worth reading.
Nobody has reviewed this listing. The rating on the card is the mean of the reviews written here and nothing else, so there is no rating until somebody writes the first — which takes an account with 50 real tool calls against it.