Community Gmail server with auto-auth: search, read and send email via MCP.
Nothing to run from here
AstraVerify Domain Trust Check is installed from its publisher's own source and answers where it runs, so this marketplace is not in the path of a single call. There is no address here to send one to, and a panel that pretended otherwise would be showing you an answer we made up. Install it and call it from your own client — the Installation tab has the entry for each one.
5
tools declared
—
trust score
remote
at its publisher
—
calls last 7d
What it does
Email security and AI discoverability scores for any domain, with the exact record or tag to fix.
Quickstart
# 1 — add it to Claude Code
claude mcp add --scope user --transport http astraverify-domain-trust-check-mcp https://astraverify.com/mcp
# 2 — ask your agent for something these tools do
# check_email_security, check_discoverability, get_report and 2 more
AstraVerify Domain Trust Check costs nothing on mcprush: there is no plan to choose here, no cap to set and nothing mcprush can bill you for.
Publishernot claimed
ASAll 1 server
astraverify1 server
1 category
Collected from a public index. Nobody has claimed this account, so nothing here was written by its author — claim it if it is yours.
Installation
Where are you running it?
Every route below installs the same thing and ends at the same approval screen. Nothing here runs on your machine and nothing runs on ours: this server answers at its publisher’s own address, and what you install is the connection straight to it.
Claude Codedeclared by this listing
This is a public server: it answers at its publisher’s own address and this marketplace is not in the path. Claude Code registers it in one command; --scope user makes it available in every project. The transport below is http, as the publisher's own manifest declares it.
claude mcp add --scope user --transport http astraverify-domain-trust-check-mcp https://astraverify.com/mcpReconnect, or start a new session, and the tools appear in the model’s tool list.
Free on mcprush, and it answers at its publisher’s own address: this marketplace is not in the path, so there is no key of ours to hold and no card to add.
What it writes
One config entry pointing straight at the publisher’s own address — this marketplace is not in the path, and nothing from this listing executes on your machine.
What you approve
5 tools, with what each one reads, writes and reaches shown before you agree — the same list on every route above. Read the tool surface.
Tool surface
What the model actually sees. Descriptions are diffed on every release — see version history.
Check whether anyone can send email as this domain, and whether its own mail reaches the inbox. Use when the person asks about email security, spoofing or phishing risk, SPF, DKIM or DMARC setup, or why their mail goes to spam. Input: a bare domain like example.com - no scheme, no path. Given a URL or an email address, extract the domain and say what you extracted. Subdomains score in their own ri
| Parameter | Type | Required | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| domain | string | yes | The domain to check, as the person gave it (no scheme, no path). Reserved names such as example.com are refused. |
| refresh | boolean | no | Force a fresh scan instead of the cached result (rate limited) |
Check whether search engines and AI assistants can crawl, read and quote this site. Use when the person asks about SEO basics, robots.txt, sitemaps, llms.txt, or whether Google, ChatGPT, Claude or Perplexity can see their site. Input: a bare domain like example.com. Returns a Discoverability score 0-100 broken into crawl access (25: robots.txt, plus what the edge actually serves to Googlebot, Bing
| Parameter | Type | Required | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| domain | string | yes | The domain to check, as the person gave it (no scheme, no path). Reserved names such as example.com are refused. |
| refresh | boolean | no | Force a fresh scan instead of the cached result (rate limited) |
Both AstraVerify scores for a domain, plus a shareable report link. Reach for this first on any broad question - "is my domain set up right?", "check my domain", "what should I fix first?" - and use the single-subject tools only once the person has narrowed it to email or to the website. Input: a bare domain like example.com. Returns the Email Security score, the Discoverability score, every open
| Parameter | Type | Required | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| domain | string | yes | The domain to check, as the person gave it (no scheme, no path). Reserved names such as example.com are refused. |
| include_history | boolean | no | Also return how these scores have moved over time, and when |
| refresh | boolean | no | Force a fresh scan instead of the cached result (rate limited) |
Show exactly what one named crawler receives from the domain's root page. Use when the person asks "what does Google see?" or "can ChatGPT read my site?", and whenever check_discoverability reports a crawl-access problem. check_discoverability scores crawl access across all six crawlers; this returns the one raw response behind that score, which is what explains such a result rather than restating
| Parameter | Type | Required | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| agent | string | yes | — |
| domain | string | yes | The domain to check, as the person gave it (no scheme, no path). Reserved names such as example.com are refused. |
Re-check a single discoverability component after the person has fixed it. Use only once check_discoverability has reported that component failing and the person says the fix is done - never speculatively. Without a previous scan to compare against it returns NOT_READY. Inputs: domain (bare, like example.com) and component, one of crawl, plumbing, metadata, structured, answer - the identifier from
| Parameter | Type | Required | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| component | string | yes | — |
| domain | string | yes | The domain to check, as the person gave it (no scheme, no path). Reserved names such as example.com are refused. |
Free
$0 forever
- Every tool — any call limit is its publisher’s, not ours
- No card, and mcprush charges nothing for it
- Runs at its publisher’s own address — this marketplace is not in the path
- Nothing to cap, because mcprush bills nothing
What counts against your monthly calls
| Tool | Unit | Calls used | Out of the allowance |
|---|
Nothing here is billable: mcprush charges nothing to install AstraVerify Domain Trust Check or to call it, at any volume.
Call allowance · this installenforced at the gateway
Monthly allowance, in calls
—
—
Alert at 80% · then the tool returns a normal MCP error
Used this month: —
—Grade not published
No rule-by-rule report on file for this release
Two independent axes, because powerful and malicious are different questions. The grade is threat only. The capability level is blast radius, and it is never a penalty on the grade — it is priced as one subtract-only term in the score, where you can see it.
This listing is an address its publisher runs, and you connect to it directly — this marketplace is not in the path. The scanner reads packages and public source, and an address is neither. So there is no grade — not a withheld one, an unmeasured one.
Release history
This is an address its publisher runs: which release it serves is theirs to choose, so there is nothing here to pin. The history below is for reading; the current release on file is 1.0.1.
1.0.1
undated
latestNo release note was published with this version.
—
no reviews yet
Who can review
One review per account, from a signed-in account that does not publish this listing. Nothing else is asked — you can say what you think before you install it. Publishers can reply once per review, and a review can be edited or deleted by whoever wrote it.
Sign in to write one
Any signed-in account that does not publish AstraVerify Domain Trust Check can review it, once — before installing it or after. A review from an account that has installed it is marked as one.
No reviews yet
Nobody has reviewed this listing. The rating on the card is the mean of the reviews written here and nothing else, so there is no rating until somebody writes the first — which takes a signed-in account that does not publish it, and nothing else.