MCP server for Gong.io - access calls, transcripts, and users
Nothing to run from here
BitBusca — data from Brazil is installed from its publisher's own source and answers where it runs, so this marketplace is not in the path of a single call. There is no address here to send one to, and a panel that pretended otherwise would be showing you an answer we made up. Install it and call it from your own client — the Installation tab has the entry for each one.
—
trust score
—
calls last 7d
remote
at its publisher
—
p95 latency
What it does
Brazilian data in one key: CPF (Brazilian individual taxpayer registration number), CNPJ (Brazilian company taxpayer registration number), license plate, companies, DJEN (Brazilian government database), tenders, lawyers, and real estate.
Quickstart
# 1 — add it to Claude Code
claude mcp add --scope user --transport http bitbusca-data-from-brazil-mcp https://api.bitbusca.net/api/v1/mcp/empresas --header 'Authorization: Bearer ${CHAVE}'
It needs CHAVE (Chave da API BitBusca no formato 'Bearer <chave>'. Use bk_test_ (grátis, dados fictícios) para testar e bk_live_ em produção. Crie em…): this sends it in the Authorization header from your environment, so export it first — its endpoint answers 401 without it.
BitBusca — data from Brazil costs nothing on mcprush: there is no plan to choose here, no cap to set and nothing mcprush can bill you for.
Publishernot claimed
BIAll 2 servers
bitbusca2 servers
2 categories
Collected from a public index. Nobody has claimed this account, so nothing here was written by its author — claim it if it is yours.
Installation
Where are you running it?
Every route below installs the same thing and ends at the same approval screen. Nothing here runs on your machine and nothing runs on ours: this server answers at its publisher’s own address, and what you install is the connection straight to it.
Claude Codedeclared by this listing
This is a public server: it answers at its publisher’s own address and this marketplace is not in the path. Claude Code registers it in one command; --scope user makes it available in every project. The transport below is http, as the publisher's own manifest declares it. Claude Code reads CHAVE (Chave da API BitBusca no formato 'Bearer <chave>'. Use bk_test_ (grátis, dados fictícios) para testar e bk_live_ em produção. Crie em…) from your environment each time it connects and sends it in the Authorization header — its endpoint answers 401 without it — so the key stays out of its config: export it in your shell profile (macOS, Linux), or run setx CHAVE … and open a new terminal (Windows).
claude mcp add --scope user --transport http bitbusca-data-from-brazil-mcp https://api.bitbusca.net/api/v1/mcp/empresas --header 'Authorization: Bearer ${CHAVE}'Reconnect, or start a new session, and the tools appear in the model’s tool list.
Free on mcprush, and it answers at its publisher’s own address: this marketplace is not in the path, so there is no key of ours to hold and no card to add — but its publisher asks for a key of their own on every call.
What it asks of you
It reaches a system of yours, so it needs settings only you can give it: Authorization header — Chave da API BitBusca no formato 'Bearer <chave>'. Use bk_test_ (grátis, dados fictícios) para testar e bk_live_ em produção. Crie em https://bitbusca.net/desenvolvedor. You set it in your own client’s config, on your machine — this marketplace never holds it.
What it writes
One config entry pointing straight at the publisher’s own address — this marketplace is not in the path, and nothing from this listing executes on your machine.
What you approve
This listing has not published its tool surface here yet, so what a client will ask you to approve is whatever the manifest declares at install time.
Tool surface
What the model actually sees. Descriptions are diffed on every release — see version history.
No tool surface on file
This listing has not published its tool list here yet. Nothing is shown here rather than another listing’s tools, which is what this page used to do.
Free
$0 forever
- Every tool — any call limit is its publisher’s, not ours
- No card, and mcprush charges nothing for it
- Runs at its publisher’s own address — this marketplace is not in the path
- Nothing to cap, because mcprush bills nothing
What counts against your monthly calls
| Tool | Unit | Calls used | Out of the allowance |
|---|
Nothing here is billable: mcprush charges nothing to install BitBusca — data from Brazil or to call it, at any volume.
Call allowance · this installenforced at the gateway
Monthly allowance, in calls
—
—
Alert at 80% · then the tool returns a normal MCP error
Used this month: —
—Grade not published
No rule-by-rule report on file for this release
Two independent axes, because powerful and malicious are different questions. The grade is threat only. The capability level is blast radius, and it is never a penalty on the grade — it is priced as one subtract-only term in the score, where you can see it.
This listing is an address its publisher runs, and you connect to it directly — this marketplace is not in the path. The scanner reads packages and public source, and an address is neither. So there is no grade — not a withheld one, an unmeasured one.
Release history
This is an address its publisher runs: which release it serves is theirs to choose, so there is nothing here to pin. The history below is for reading; the current release on file is 1.1.0.
1.1.0
undated
latestNo release note was published with this version.
—
no reviews yet
Who can review
One review per account, from a signed-in account that does not publish this listing. Nothing else is asked — you can say what you think before you install it. Publishers can reply once per review, and a review can be edited or deleted by whoever wrote it.
Sign in to write one
Any signed-in account that does not publish BitBusca — data from Brazil can review it, once — before installing it or after. A review from an account that has installed it is marked as one.
No reviews yet
Nobody has reviewed this listing. The rating on the card is the mean of the reviews written here and nothing else, so there is no rating until somebody writes the first — which takes a signed-in account that does not publish it, and nothing else.