Pink Agentic AI Payments (by PinkWallet): lets Claude, ChatGPT, Cursor pay vendor invoices within company spending rules (budgets, caps, allow-lists, human approval). Sandbox preview, test money.
Lumière PayCheck is installed from its publisher's own source and answers where it runs, so this marketplace is not in the path of a single call. There is no address here to send one to, and a panel that pretended otherwise would be showing you an answer we made up. Install it and call it from your own client — the Installation tab has the entry for each one.
What it does
Check any x402 endpoint before your AI agent pays it: trust grade, verdict, and hijack checks.
Quickstart
Run once first — the server needs this before it answers:
npm install x402-paycheck# 1 — add it to Claude Code
claude mcp add --scope user --transport http lumiere-paycheck-mcp 'https://lumierepaycheck.org/mcp?plans=1'
# 2 — ask your agent for something these tools do
# check_endpoint, check_payment, report_outcome and 3 more
Lumière PayCheck costs nothing on mcprush: there is no plan to choose here, no cap to set and nothing mcprush can bill you for.
Where are you running it?
Every route below installs the same thing and ends at the same approval screen. Nothing here runs on your machine and nothing runs on ours: this server answers at its publisher’s own address, and what you install is the connection straight to it.
This is a public server: it answers at its publisher’s own address and this marketplace is not in the path. Claude Code registers it in one command; --scope user makes it available in every project. The transport below is http, as the publisher's own manifest declares it.
claude mcp add --scope user --transport http lumiere-paycheck-mcp 'https://lumierepaycheck.org/mcp?plans=1'Reconnect, or start a new session, and the tools appear in the model’s tool list.
One config entry pointing straight at the publisher’s own address — this marketplace is not in the path, and nothing from this listing executes on your machine.
6 tools, with what each one reads, writes and reaches shown before you agree — the same list on every route above. Read the tool surface.
Tool surface
What the model actually sees. Descriptions are diffed on every release — see version history.
Get the trust verdict for one x402 endpoint: score (0-100), grade (A-F), and verdict (proceed, caution, avoid, free, or insufficient_data), plus uptime, delivery-test status, and payout-wallet incidents. Use it when you're deciding whether an endpoint is trustworthy at all, before you have a price quote. When you already have the 402 quote (amount and payTo) and are about to pay, use check_payment
No parameter schema on file.
Decide whether a specific x402 payment should go through: returns allow true/false with reasons. Checks the endpoint's trust verdict, that the amount is within your cap and not above the monitored price, and that the payTo wallet matches the one we've observed (catches swapped or hijacked wallets). Use it right before paying, with the amount, payTo, and network from the endpoint's 402 quote; pay o
No parameter schema on file.
Report whether a paid x402 call delivered a usable response, using the receipt from a Lumière PayCheck allow decision (the paid /v1/authorize API). Use it once, right after paying, only when you have such a receipt; skip it if you paid without one, or if the user asked you not to report. Not for checking endpoints (use check_endpoint or check_payment). Records one vote per buyer and payment within
No parameter schema on file.
List the x402 endpoints that are currently safest to pay (verdict proceed or caution, no payout-wallet incidents), best first, with score, grade, verdict, and whether a real test payment was delivered. Use it to discover reliable endpoints or pick between providers. To evaluate one specific endpoint use check_endpoint; to approve a payment use check_payment. Read-only and free; rankings update as
No parameter schema on file.
Get an overview of the whole monitored x402 catalog: how many endpoints are monitored, how many fall into each verdict (proceed, caution, avoid, free, insufficient_data), and when scores were last computed. Use it for context or reporting, for example to tell a user how much of the x402 ecosystem passes checks. It says nothing about any single endpoint: use check_endpoint for one endpoint, top_end
No parameter schema on file.
Get instructions for buying the detailed paid report on one x402 endpoint (score breakdown, current price quote, wallet and price history, test-payment results). Returns the report URL, price, and network; it doesn't buy the report itself. The report is an x402 endpoint that your agent pays with any x402 client. Use it only when the free check_endpoint result isn't enough and the user wants the fu
No parameter schema on file.
- Every tool — any call limit is its publisher’s, not ours
- No card, and mcprush charges nothing for it
- Runs at its publisher’s own address — this marketplace is not in the path
- Nothing to cap, because mcprush bills nothing
What counts against your monthly calls
| Tool | Unit | Calls used | Out of the allowance |
|---|
Nothing here is billable: mcprush charges nothing to install Lumière PayCheck or to call it, at any volume.
Two independent axes, because powerful and malicious are different questions. The grade is threat only. The capability level is blast radius, and it is never a penalty on the grade — it is priced as one subtract-only term in the score, where you can see it.
This listing is an address its publisher runs, and you connect to it directly — this marketplace is not in the path. The scanner reads packages and public source, and an address is neither: the repository linked on this page is where this record was collected from, not a copy of what the address serves, so it is not graded in its place. So there is no grade — not a withheld one, an unmeasured one.
Release history
This is an address its publisher runs: which release it serves is theirs to choose, so there is nothing here to pin. The history below is for reading; the current release on file is 1.8.0.
No release note was published with this version.
One review per account, from a signed-in account that does not publish this listing. Nothing else is asked — you can say what you think before you install it. Publishers can reply once per review, and a review can be edited or deleted by whoever wrote it.
Any signed-in account that does not publish Lumière PayCheck can review it, once — before installing it or after. A review from an account that has installed it is marked as one.
Nobody has reviewed this listing. The rating on the card is the mean of the reviews written here and nothing else, so there is no rating until somebody writes the first — which takes a signed-in account that does not publish it, and nothing else.