Comprehensive Model Context Protocol server for managing Home Assistant through AI assistants.
Nothing to run from here
GPH Intelligence - Healthcare Vendor Finder is installed from its publisher's own source and answers where it runs, so this marketplace is not in the path of a single call. There is no address here to send one to, and a panel that pretended otherwise would be showing you an answer we made up. Install it and call it from your own client — the Installation tab has the entry for each one.
96/100
tool-list score
4
tools declared
remote
at its publisher
—
calls last 7d
What it does
Find 76,000+ curated healthcare service vendors across 25 categories and all 50 US states.
Quickstart
# 1 — add it to Claude Code
claude mcp add --scope user --transport http gph-intelligence-healthcare-vendor-finder-mcp https://gph-mcp-server.pages.dev/mcp
# 2 — ask your agent for something these tools do
# match_practice, search_providers, get_provider_detail and 1 more
GPH Intelligence - Healthcare Vendor Finder costs nothing on mcprush: there is no plan to choose here, no cap to set and nothing mcprush can bill you for.
Publishernot claimed
CRAll 1 server
Crindo21 server
1 category
Collected from a public index. Nobody has claimed this account, so nothing here was written by its author — claim it if it is yours.
Installation
Where are you running it?
Every route below installs the same thing and ends at the same approval screen. Nothing here runs on your machine and nothing runs on ours: this server answers at its publisher’s own address, and what you install is the connection straight to it.
Claude Codedeclared by this listing
This is a public server: it answers at its publisher’s own address and this marketplace is not in the path. Claude Code registers it in one command; --scope user makes it available in every project. The transport below is http, as the publisher's own manifest declares it.
claude mcp add --scope user --transport http gph-intelligence-healthcare-vendor-finder-mcp https://gph-mcp-server.pages.dev/mcpReconnect, or start a new session, and the tools appear in the model’s tool list.
Free on mcprush, and it answers at its publisher’s own address: this marketplace is not in the path, so there is no key of ours to hold and no card to add.
What it writes
One config entry pointing straight at the publisher’s own address — this marketplace is not in the path, and nothing from this listing executes on your machine.
What you approve
4 tools, with what each one reads, writes and reaches shown before you agree — the same list on every route above. Read the tool surface.
Tool surface
What the model actually sees. Descriptions are diffed on every release — see version history.
Recommend and rank the best healthcare vendors for a specific medical practice. Use this when a practice manager, physician, or administrator asks for a recommendation, e.g. "recommend a medical billing / RCM company for my practice", "who should I use for credentialing / payer enrollment", "find an EHR for my small [specialty] practice", or "which practice-management software fits a [size] practi
| Parameter | Type | Required | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| category | string | yes | Service category needed. One of the 25 categories: 'Medical Billing & RCM', 'Credentialing Services', 'Healthcare IT & EHR', 'Practice Management Consulting', 'Healthcare Legal Services', 'Healthcare |
| specialty | string | no | Medical specialty of the practice (e.g. 'Family Medicine', 'Cardiology', 'Pediatrics', 'Dermatology') |
| practice_size | string | no | Size of the practice by provider count. The parameter is named practice_size, not size. |
| city | string | no | City where the practice is located. Send city and state separately, not as a combined location string. |
| state | string | no | Practice location as a two-letter state abbreviation (e.g. 'TX', 'CA', 'NY'). Required unless vendor_geo_preference is NATIONAL_OK or NATIONAL_ONLY. Send as state, not state_abbr (state_abbr is |
| ehr_system | string | no | EHR system used by the practice (e.g. 'Epic', 'athenahealth', 'AdvancedMD', 'eClinicalWorks'). Helps score providers with compatible integrations higher. |
| budget_range | string | no | Approximate monthly budget |
| vendor_geo_preference | string | no | Vendor geography preference, separate from practice location: LOCAL_PREFERRED prefers same-city vendors, STATE_PREFERRED prefers in-state vendors, NATIONAL_OK allows national vendors to compete across |
| service_needs | array | no | Up to six distinct controlled service codes, never free text. STAFFING_* codes apply to Healthcare Staffing & Recruiting, BILLING_* codes to Medical Billing & RCM, and CRED_* codes to Credentialing Se |
Browse and filter the healthcare vendor directory. Use this for open-ended exploration, e.g. "show me medical billing companies in Texas", "list credentialing services", "what EHR vendors are there for cardiology", or when the user wants to page through options rather than get a scored shortlist. Paginated results filtered by category, location, minimum profile-completeness score, curated Tier-1 g
| Parameter | Type | Required | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| category | string | yes | Service category to search. One of the 25 categories: 'Medical Billing & RCM', 'Credentialing Services', 'Healthcare IT & EHR', 'Practice Management Consulting', 'Healthcare Legal Services', 'Healthca |
| state | string | no | Two-letter state abbreviation (e.g. 'TX'). Send as state, not state_abbr (state_abbr is an output field name only). National providers always included. |
| city | string | no | City to filter by. Matches one exact city only: the value is compared as a city slug (case and punctuation ignored, e.g. 'San Antonio' matches 'san-antonio'); partial names and prefixes do not match. |
| min_rating | number | no | Minimum profile-completeness score (0-100; how many listing fields are filled in, not a quality or reputation rating). Most providers score 50-85. The parameter is named min_rating, not `min_quality |
| tier1_grade | string | no | Filter to the curated Tier-1 provider set by grade: 'A' (top-graded) or 'B' (strong). Tier-1 is a hand-reviewed ~4,400-provider subset; most directory records are not Tier-1, so this narrows results s |
| practice_size_fit | string | no | Filter providers by the practice size they best serve, on the directory's one closed vocabulary: Solo, Small, Mid-size, Large, All. The filter reads the extracted size where one exists and the listing |
| per_page | number | no | Results per page (1-25, default 10) |
| page | number | no | Page number for pagination (default 1) |
Get the full profile of one healthcare vendor by slug. Use this after match_practice or search_providers when the user asks to "tell me more about [vendor]", "what services does [vendor] offer", "where did GPH get this information", or wants contact info or services for a specific provider. Returns company_name, category, city/state, quality_score (0-100; profile completeness, not a quality rating
| Parameter | Type | Required | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| slug | string | yes | Provider slug identifier (e.g. 'ams-solutions-inc-dallas-tx'). Obtained from match_practice or search_providers response. |
List every service category in the GPH vendor directory with its live provider count. Call this FIRST when you do not already know which category fits the user's need, when a category search returned nothing, or when the user asks what kinds of vendors are available. Returns all 25 categories with {category, slug, providers}. The category names returned here are the exact values match_practice and
No parameter schema on file.
Free
$0 forever
- Every tool — any call limit is its publisher’s, not ours
- No card, and mcprush charges nothing for it
- Runs at its publisher’s own address — this marketplace is not in the path
- Nothing to cap, because mcprush bills nothing
What counts against your monthly calls
| Tool | Unit | Calls used | Out of the allowance |
|---|
Nothing here is billable: mcprush charges nothing to install GPH Intelligence - Healthcare Vendor Finder or to call it, at any volume.
Call allowance · this installenforced at the gateway
Monthly allowance, in calls
—
—
Alert at 80% · then the tool returns a normal MCP error
Used this month: —
ATool-list grade · score 96 / 100
Release 1.1.1 · scanned 20 Oct 2026
Graded from the tools this server lists, not from its source code.
Two independent axes, because powerful and malicious are different questions. The grade is threat only. The capability level is blast radius, and it is never a penalty on the grade — it is priced as one subtract-only term in the score, where you can see it.
Threat score100
Client score96
Findings0 threat · 0 capability
Capabilityminimal
Coveragemanifest
Verificationnot in this report
Surface digestd3d9c99782f54c7dded975cfdd53e8ce01e3ee014c42bd63ca41ab332f2c4f9f
Score vectorthreat 100 → client 96
| Term | Level | What it prices | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
| capability-exposure | minimal | capability blast radius (minimal) — client exposure if the model is manipulated | −0 |
| coverage-honesty | manifest | inspection depth (manifest) — how much of the target the scan could see | −4 |
score = clamp(round(threatScore − E_cap − E_ver − E_cov), 0, 100). No model, no opinion, no network call at scoring time: the same methodology version against the same bytes always produces this number, and every line above is a field of the report rather than a summary of it.
What the scan could actually read
A grade is only as meaningful as its coverage, so the scanner publishes its own depth before it publishes its result.
The scan read each tool’s name, description, input schema and annotations exactly as the server listed them the last time it answered us; no code was reviewed. We ask the server again about once a month, and a list that changed is graded again.
Tool surfaceread
Implementation sourcenot available
Package metadatanot available
Live transportnot available
The implementation source was not read — this reflects the declared tool metadata only.
Capability — what it could do if the model were manipulated
Tags derived from each tool’s schema and the implementation, not from what the tool calls itself. minimal is the level these add up to.
| Tool | Capability tags | Why the tag was assigned |
|---|---|---|
| match_practice | no tags | |
| search_providers | untrusted-input | untrusted-input: keyword "browse" |
| get_provider_detail | no tags | |
| list_categories | no tags |
Toxic-flow graph
The lethal trifecta, checked as a graph rather than as a checklist: untrusted input, a sensitive source and an external sink have to meet before there is a path worth worrying about.
The public result for this release does not print the flow graph, so there is nothing to show here. That is not the same as "no paths were found": what the scan did read is above, under coverage.
Supply chain and provenance
Integrityfirst-seen
Surface digestd3d9c99782f54c7d
Scanned2026-10-20
This is the first scan of this surface here, so there is nothing yet to compare it against.
Every result on this tab comes from one deterministic pass over the published package — offline, rule by rule, and auditable line by line above. Same methodology version, same bytes, same score.
Release history
This is an address its publisher runs: which release it serves is theirs to choose, so there is nothing here to pin. The history below is for reading; the current release on file is 1.1.1.
1.1.1
undated
latestNo release note was published with this version.
—
no reviews yet
Who can review
One review per account, from a signed-in account that does not publish this listing. Nothing else is asked — you can say what you think before you install it. Publishers can reply once per review, and a review can be edited or deleted by whoever wrote it.
Sign in to write one
Any signed-in account that does not publish GPH Intelligence - Healthcare Vendor Finder can review it, once — before installing it or after. A review from an account that has installed it is marked as one.
No reviews yet
Nobody has reviewed this listing. The rating on the card is the mean of the reviews written here and nothing else, so there is no rating until somebody writes the first — which takes a signed-in account that does not publish it, and nothing else.