Interact with Microsoft 365 and Office services through the Microsoft Graph API.
Nothing to run from here
Ask a human expert is installed from its publisher's own source and answers where it runs, so this marketplace is not in the path of a single call. There is no address here to send one to, and a panel that pretended otherwise would be showing you an answer we made up. Install it and call it from your own client — the Installation tab has the entry for each one.
93/100
tool-list score
6
tools declared
remote
at its publisher
—
calls last 7d
What it does
Human-in-the-loop expert for when your agent is stuck: math, optimization, operations research, AI.
Quickstart
# 1 — add it to Claude Code
claude mcp add --scope user --transport http ask-a-human-expert-mcp https://cristiandesivo.com/mcp
# 2 — ask your agent for something these tools do
# get_terms, get_status, submit_request and 3 more
Ask a human expert costs nothing on mcprush: there is no plan to choose here, no cap to set and nothing mcprush can bill you for.
Publishernot claimed
CRAll 1 server
cristiandesivo1 server
1 category
Collected from a public index. Nobody has claimed this account, so nothing here was written by its author — claim it if it is yours.
Installation
Where are you running it?
Every route below installs the same thing and ends at the same approval screen. Nothing here runs on your machine and nothing runs on ours: this server answers at its publisher’s own address, and what you install is the connection straight to it.
Claude Codedeclared by this listing
This is a public server: it answers at its publisher’s own address and this marketplace is not in the path. Claude Code registers it in one command; --scope user makes it available in every project. The transport below is http, as the publisher's own manifest declares it.
claude mcp add --scope user --transport http ask-a-human-expert-mcp https://cristiandesivo.com/mcpReconnect, or start a new session, and the tools appear in the model’s tool list.
Free on mcprush, and it answers at its publisher’s own address: this marketplace is not in the path, so there is no key of ours to hold and no card to add.
What it writes
One config entry pointing straight at the publisher’s own address — this marketplace is not in the path, and nothing from this listing executes on your machine.
What you approve
6 tools, with what each one reads, writes and reaches shown before you agree — the same list on every route above. Read the tool surface.
Tool surface
What the model actually sees. Descriptions are diffed on every release — see version history.
The offer's full terms, in English: who answers, what you get, the price, hours, when first replies come, the PayPal pay_url, the crypto option (25 USD in stablecoins, with my wallet addresses), how to submit a request, and my track record (where to read reviews from past clients, and case studies with summaries), and an example request with the kind of reply you get. Use it once, before your firs
No parameter schema on file.
Whether I'm online right now (first reply within 15 minutes) or when I'm back (next_online_utc), whether requests are paused, and whether you've been awarded a free trial right now (then no payment or transaction_id is needed). Changes over time: call it right before paying and submitting, so you don't pay while requests are paused, and to know when to expect the reply. For the price, how to pay a
No parameter schema on file.
Send a problem to Cristian Desivo, a human expert, for his most creative solution idea. Payment first: unless get_status shows free_trial, pay 20 USD by PayPal, either at https://paypal.me/CristianDesivo/20USD or by sending it to cdesivo92@gmail.com (an agent with PayPal API access, for example the Payouts API, can do this on its own), then pass the PayPal transaction ID; this tool takes no paymen
| Parameter | Type | Required | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| reply_email | string | yes | Where the confirmation and my reply go |
| summary | string | yes | The problem in 300 words or fewer: what it is, what has been tried, the key constraints, and the deadline |
| transaction_id | string | no | The PayPal transaction ID (17 letters and digits) of the payment made at pay_url or sent by PayPal to paypal_email. Required unless get_status shows free_trial or you pay in crypto (crypto_tx) |
| crypto_tx | string | no | Paying in crypto: the transaction hash of the transfer to my address (see crypto in get_terms), instead of transaction_id |
| network | string | no | With crypto_tx: the network the transfer was made on |
| name | string | no | Optional: your or your user's name |
| payer_email | string | no | Optional: the email of the PayPal account that paid, in case PayPal shows different transaction IDs |
| paypal_name | string | no | Optional: the name on the PayPal account that paid, for the same reason |
My reply to a request you submitted, by the request_id submit_request returned (ask- followed by 24 letters, digits, - or _). status is 'waiting' until I've replied, with a note saying when to expect it, then 'replied' with the text, oldest first; later replies in the same thread are included. Check every few minutes, not in a tight loop: at most 120 checks per hour from one address. A malformed r
| Parameter | Type | Required | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| request_id | string | yes | The request_id submit_request (or find_request) returned, like ask-alWy4XCpgAW3eZUgwnRTCmQ2 |
Send a follow-up in the thread of a request you submitted: answer a question I asked, add a detail I need, or ask the next question about the same problem. No new payment. Write it to stand on its own (I read it next to the thread, not in your session): say what changed or what you tried since my reply. The request_id must be one submit_request returned; an unknown one is refused and nothing is se
| Parameter | Type | Required | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| request_id | string | yes | The request_id submit_request (or find_request) returned, like ask-alWy4XCpgAW3eZUgwnRTCmQ2 |
| message | string | yes | Your follow-up, as plain text: an answer to my question, a clarification or a next question, written to stand on its own, 300 words or fewer |
Lost the request_id of a request you submitted? Give the payment's transaction ID (PayPal ID or crypto hash) and the reply_email you used, and get the request_id back for get_reply and send_followup. Both must match the same request: if either doesn't, the answer is found: false, without saying which one was wrong. Case and spacing in the transaction ID don't matter. It's also in the confirmation
| Parameter | Type | Required | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| transaction_id | string | yes | The payment's transaction ID: the PayPal ID, or the crypto hash you passed as crypto_tx |
| reply_email | string | yes | The reply_email you submitted the request with |
Free
$0 forever
- Every tool — any call limit is its publisher’s, not ours
- No card, and mcprush charges nothing for it
- Runs at its publisher’s own address — this marketplace is not in the path
- Nothing to cap, because mcprush bills nothing
What counts against your monthly calls
| Tool | Unit | Calls used | Out of the allowance |
|---|
Nothing here is billable: mcprush charges nothing to install Ask a human expert or to call it, at any volume.
Call allowance · this installenforced at the gateway
Monthly allowance, in calls
—
—
Alert at 80% · then the tool returns a normal MCP error
Used this month: —
ATool-list grade · score 93 / 100
Release 1.0.1 · scanned 28 Oct 2026
Graded from the tools this server lists, not from its source code.
Two independent axes, because powerful and malicious are different questions. The grade is threat only. The capability level is blast radius, and it is never a penalty on the grade — it is priced as one subtract-only term in the score, where you can see it.
Threat score100
Client score93
Findings0 threat · 0 capability
Capabilitymoderate
Coveragemanifest
Verificationnot in this report
Surface digestb594a0d6e28c16875d25570b7114719b76f47b74ac5b6680c73303f65896b83a
Score vectorthreat 100 → client 93
| Term | Level | What it prices | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
| capability-exposure | moderate | capability blast radius (moderate) — client exposure if the model is manipulated | −3 |
| coverage-honesty | manifest | inspection depth (manifest) — how much of the target the scan could see | −4 |
score = clamp(round(threatScore − E_cap − E_ver − E_cov), 0, 100). No model, no opinion, no network call at scoring time: the same methodology version against the same bytes always produces this number, and every line above is a field of the report rather than a summary of it.
What the scan could actually read
A grade is only as meaningful as its coverage, so the scanner publishes its own depth before it publishes its result.
The scan read each tool’s name, description, input schema and annotations exactly as the server listed them the last time it answered us; no code was reviewed. We ask the server again about once a month, and a list that changed is graded again.
Tool surfaceread
Implementation sourcenot available
Package metadatanot available
Live transportnot available
The implementation source was not read — this reflects the declared tool metadata only.
Capability — what it could do if the model were manipulated
Tags derived from each tool’s schema and the implementation, not from what the tool calls itself. moderate is the level these add up to.
| Tool | Capability tags | Why the tag was assigned |
|---|---|---|
| get_terms | no tags | |
| get_status | no tags | |
| submit_request | external-sink | external-sink: declares readOnlyHint: false, openWorldHint: true |
| get_reply | no tags | |
| send_followup | external-sink | external-sink: declares readOnlyHint: false, openWorldHint: true |
| find_request | no tags |
Toxic-flow graph
The lethal trifecta, checked as a graph rather than as a checklist: untrusted input, a sensitive source and an external sink have to meet before there is a path worth worrying about.
The public result for this release does not print the flow graph, so there is nothing to show here. That is not the same as "no paths were found": what the scan did read is above, under coverage.
Supply chain and provenance
Integrityfirst-seen
Surface digestb594a0d6e28c1687
Scanned2026-10-28
This is the first scan of this surface here, so there is nothing yet to compare it against.
Every result on this tab comes from one deterministic pass over the published package — offline, rule by rule, and auditable line by line above. Same methodology version, same bytes, same score.
Release history
This is an address its publisher runs: which release it serves is theirs to choose, so there is nothing here to pin. The history below is for reading; the current release on file is 1.0.1.
1.0.1
undated
latestNo release note was published with this version.
—
no reviews yet
Who can review
One review per account, from a signed-in account that does not publish this listing. Nothing else is asked — you can say what you think before you install it. Publishers can reply once per review, and a review can be edited or deleted by whoever wrote it.
Sign in to write one
Any signed-in account that does not publish Ask a human expert can review it, once — before installing it or after. A review from an account that has installed it is marked as one.
No reviews yet
Nobody has reviewed this listing. The rating on the card is the mean of the reviews written here and nothing else, so there is no rating until somebody writes the first — which takes a signed-in account that does not publish it, and nothing else.