Name: CULT+MATH Decision Briefs
Author: cultmath

CULT+MATH Decision Briefs MCP

Sourced, dated evidence for executive decisions: free studies, $495 briefs, paid SEC filing runs.

Tool-list grade A Remote · Streamable HTTP No auth needed 24 tools v1.1.0

No reviews yet by cultmath The publisher’s own endpoint — this marketplace is not in the path

93/100

tool-list score

tools declared

remote

at its publisher

—

calls last 7d

What it does

Sourced, dated evidence for executive decisions: free studies, $495 briefs, paid SEC filing runs.

Quickstart

# 1 — add it to Claude Code
claude mcp add --scope user --transport http cult-math-decision-briefs-mcp https://cultmath.com/mcp

# 2 — ask your agent for something these tools do
#   list_decision_briefs, get_decision_brief, search_cultmath and 21 more

CULT+MATH Decision Briefs costs nothing on mcprush: there is no plan to choose here, no cap to set and nothing mcprush can bill you for.

Publishernot claimed

cultmath1 server

1 category

All 1 server

Collected from a public index. Nobody has claimed this account, so nothing here was written by its author — claim it if it is yours.

Tool surface

What the model actually sees. Descriptions are diffed on every release — see version history.

Only tools that write or reach the network

List the CULT+MATH Decision Briefs: who each is written for, its headline finding, price, page and payment link. Also lists bundles and the custom brief.

Parameter	Type	Required	Notes
category	string	no	Optional filter, e.g. "CPG", "Entertainment", "Private equity".

Everything public about one brief: the six decisions it covers with the evidence line for each, pages, edition, price, sample pages, free answers, guarantee, license and payment link. The PDF itself is delivered only after payment.

Parameter	Type	Required	Notes
id	string	yes	Brief id from list_decision_briefs, e.g. "cpg-premium".

Search the free CULT+MATH studies and answers (and the briefs) by keywords. Returns titles, URLs, dates, the lead finding and the brief that goes deeper.

Parameter	Type	Required	Notes
query	string	yes	Keywords, e.g. "streaming ad tier" or "retailer concentration".
kind	string	no	Restrict results. Default any.
limit	integer	no	Default 5.

The 54 decisions inside the briefs (six per brief), each with who owns it, who contests it, and the public evidence line. Use an id with buy_decision_evidence to buy the full evidence for just that decision.

Parameter	Type	Required	Notes
brief_id	string	no	Optional: only this brief, e.g. "cpg-premium".
query	string	no	Optional keywords to filter by.

Starts a Stripe checkout for the full evidence behind one decision: sourced and dated figures, what would flip the answer, and the brief's stated limits. Returns a checkout URL for the user to approve and pay, and a session_id. After the user pays, call get_decision_evidence with both ids. Always show the price and get the user's go-ahead before sending them to pay.

Parameter	Type	Required	Notes
decision_id	string	yes	From list_decisions, e.g. "cpg-premium/02".

Returns the full evidence for one decision once it is paid for. Pass the session_id from buy_decision_evidence, or the Checkout Session id of a full brief, team license, pack or all-access purchase that includes this decision.

Parameter	Type	Required	Notes
decision_id	string	yes	—
session_id	string	yes	A Stripe Checkout Session id (cs_live_...).

Every published finding (question and answer) of one CULT+MATH study or answer page, with its date, license, citation line and related brief.

Parameter	Type	Required	Notes
url	string	yes	A cultmath.com/research/... or /answers/... URL from search_cultmath, or its last path segment.

Use when the user asks whether a risk, technology or theme is spreading through public companies, or whether companies now treat it as material. Returns, year by year, the share of U.S. 10-K filers that mention the phrase, from SEC EDGAR full-text search, with a denominator control ("competition") and a null control ("shrinkflation") that must read 0. Safe to cite: its controls are checked first,

Parameter	Type	Required	Notes
phrase	string	yes	The phrase to count, without quote marks, e.g. "tariff" or "GLP-1".
start	integer	no	First year (2001 onward). Default: four years ago.
end	integer	no	Last year, not in the future. Default: this year. At most 10 years per run.

Use when the user asks whether rules are coming on a topic, or how much federal rule-making mentions it, optionally for one agency. Returns, year by year, the share of U.S. federal final and proposed rules that mention the phrase, from the Federal Register, against every final and proposed rule that year, with a null control that must read 0. Safe to cite: its controls are checked first, it states

Parameter	Type	Required	Notes
phrase	string	yes	The phrase to count, without quote marks, e.g. "front-of-package" or "PFAS".
start	integer	no	First year (1994 onward). Default: four years ago.
end	integer	no	Last year, not in the future. Default: this year. At most 10 years per run.
agency	string	no	Optional: count only this agency's rules.

Use when the user asks whether federal money backs a market, technology or policy, or wants evidence beyond announcements. Returns the share of U.S. federal prime contract obligations matching the keyword, by fiscal year, from USAspending.gov, against all contract obligations. Safe to cite: its controls are checked first, it states its limits, and every result carries a run id, a date and a citati

Parameter	Type	Required	Notes
phrase	string	yes	The phrase to measure, without quote marks.
start	integer	no	First federal fiscal year. Default: four years ago.
end	integer	no	Last fiscal year, not after the current one. At most 10.

Use when the user needs to know whether a trend is substantive or hype before acting on it. Returns, year by year, the share of 10-K filers mentioning it (SEC EDGAR), of federal final and proposed rules (Federal Register) and of federal contract obligations (USAspending), each line's direction, and whether the three agree. If any source fails its controls the whole run refuses. Safe to cite: its c

Parameter	Type	Required	Notes
phrase	string	yes	The phrase to measure, without quote marks.
start	integer	no	First year. Default: four years ago.
end	integer	no	Last year. At most 5 years per run.

Use when the user names a public company and asks how its growth, margin, R&D or marketing spend compares with competitors. Returns the company's revenue growth, gross margin, or R&D or sales-and-marketing as a share of revenue for its latest fiscal year, each peer's, the peer median, the gap and the rank, from SEC EDGAR XBRL as filed; every excluded peer is named with the reason. Safe to cite: it

Parameter	Type	Required	Notes
ticker	string	yes	The company.
peers	string	yes	2-6 peer tickers from the same list, comma-separated, e.g. "CAG,CPB,KHC".
metric	string	yes	—

Use when the user asks whether their brand or website shows up in AI answers, or who AI assistants cite instead. Asks ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini and Perplexity the buyer's question live with web search on, three times each on the everyday model and once on the flagship model, and returns per platform: in how many askings the domain was cited and at what positions, whether that held every time, and wh

Parameter	Type	Required	Notes
question	string	yes	The question a buyer would ask an AI assistant. No personal data.
domain	string	yes	The domain to look for, e.g. example.com. Its subdomains count.

Use when the user asks whether any company, or which of a named set of competitors, now reports a figure (a franchise share, ARPU, a retention rate, a concentration, a multiple), or whether a public comparable discloses the metric a deal model depends on. Returns, from SEC EDGAR full-text search, which filers use the phrase in their filings over the years given, with the first and latest filing li

Parameter	Type	Required	Notes
phrase	string	yes	The phrase to measure, without quote marks.
peers	string	no	Optional: 2-10 tickers, comma-separated, from: PEP, KO, K, POST, KDP, CELH, UTZ, HRL, GIS, KHC, CAG, CPB, HSY, MDLZ, SJM, CLX, CL, CHD, PG, SMPL, BRBR, MSFT, EA, TTWO, RBLX, OMC, STGW, CRM, HUBS, TDOC
form	string	no	Filing type. Default 10-K.
start	integer	no	First year. Default: two years ago.
end	integer	no	Last year. At most 10 years per run.

Use when the user asks whether a U.S. federal rule on a topic is open for comment, when the deadline is, or when a final rule takes effect. Returns, as of today, the Federal Register documents mentioning the phrase whose comment period is still open (with days left) and the final rules still waiting to take effect, optionally for one agency, each linked. Safe to cite: its controls are checked firs

Parameter	Type	Required	Notes
phrase	string	yes	The phrase to measure, without quote marks.
agency	string	no	Optional: one agency only.

Use when the user asks about M&A activity, deal flow or consolidation in a sector, whether now is a good time to buy or sell a company in it, or who the active acquirers are. Returns, quarter by quarter, the 8-K merger-agreement documents that mention the sector as a share of all 8-K merger agreements, from SEC EDGAR full-text search, whether that share is rising or falling, an industry-code cross

Parameter	Type	Required	Notes
sector	string	no	A named sector, with its phrase and industry codes set for you. Or give phrase instead.
phrase	string	no	Your own sector phrase, without quote marks, if no named sector fits. Not with sector.
sic	string	no	Optional, with phrase: four-digit SIC codes for the cross-check, comma-separated, e.g. "7372,7373".
quarters	integer	no	How many quarters, ending with the last complete one. Default 8.

Use when the user asks whether interest in a product, category or trend is really growing, or wants to know if a rise in search is more than noise before investing in it. Returns the category's year-on-year search change against an everyday basket of ten unrelated searches (its growth beyond the market), a volume band, and whether SEC 10-K filings confirm the direction, the costly-to-fake check. C

Parameter	Type	Required	Notes
phrase	string	yes	The category as people search for it, e.g. "protein snacks".
also	string	no	Optional: up to 4 more keywords for the same category, comma-separated.

Use when the user asks which brands or websites AI assistants rely on for their category, who they are competing with in AI answers, or whether any source dominates. Asks ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini and Perplexity 2-3 buyer questions live, each twice, and returns the most-cited domains as counts of answers, whether the category is owned, led, contested or fragmented, whether the leaders hold from one

Parameter	Type	Required	Notes
q1	string	yes	A question a buyer in the category would ask an AI assistant. No personal data.
q2	string	yes	A second, different buyer question.
q3	string	no	Optional third question.
domain	string	no	Optional: your domain, e.g. example.com, to see where it stands.

Use when the user asks who they really compete with, whether a competitor is gaining on them, or how their brand interest compares with rivals. Returns each brand's share of US Google searches among the brands named, the change in points against the year before, search growth and a volume band, ranked. Shares and bands only, never monthly volumes. Safe to cite: its controls are checked first, it s

Parameter	Type	Required	Notes
brand	string	yes	Your brand as people search for it.
rivals	string	yes	2-6 competing brands, comma-separated.

Use when the user asks whether their price premium is holding, whether customers are trading down, or whether a price rise is hurting demand. Returns the share of the brand's US Google searches that look for a cheaper way in (price, cheap, discount, coupon, dupe, alternative, sale), against the year before, with a verdict (eroding, holding, strengthening) and each modifier's trend. Shares and band

Parameter	Type	Required	Notes
brand	string	yes	The brand as people search for it.

Use when the user is choosing a positioning, a message or a campaign angle and asks which benefit or reason to buy matters most to buyers, or which is gaining. Returns, for each angle searched with the category, its share of searches among the angles named, its year-on-year change and its growth beyond an everyday control basket, with a volume band. Shares and bands only. Safe to cite: its control

Parameter	Type	Required	Notes
category	string	yes	The category as people search for it, e.g. "protein snacks".
angles	string	yes	2-6 reasons to buy, comma-separated, e.g. "healthy,vegan,keto,cheap".

Use when the user is planning go-to-market or channel strategy and asks where buyers look, whether to prioritise retail, review sites, their own site or communities, or who controls the first page for their category. Searches Google live for 1-3 buyer queries and classes every top-10 organic result by domain: retailers and marketplaces, reviews and media, brand sites, forums and social, reference,

Parameter	Type	Required	Notes
q1	string	yes	A search a buyer would make, e.g. "best protein bars".
q2	string	no	Optional second search.
q3	string	no	Optional third search.
brand_domains	string	no	Optional: the category's brand sites, comma-separated, so they are classed as brands.
retailer_domains	string	no	Optional: specialist retailers to class as retailers.
media_domains	string	no	Optional: specialist review or media sites to class as media.

Use when the user is choosing a positioning, a tagline or a message and asks whether competitors already say it, whether a claim is crowded or open, or who has moved onto it recently. Reads each competitor's home page today and its Internet Archive copy from a year ago, and returns, per site, whether it leads with the claim, mentions it, or does not, and whether that changed this year, with a verd

Parameter	Type	Required	Notes
claim	string	yes	The claim as a buyer would read it, e.g. "plant-based protein".
variants	string	no	Optional: up to 3 other wordings, comma-separated.
sites	string	yes	3-5 competitor domains, comma-separated.

Use when the user is writing a creative or campaign brief, or weighing a trend, and asks whether a moment, ingredient, format or cultural theme is a lasting shift or a fad that has peaked. Returns, for US Google Trends and English Wikipedia interest since 2016, how much of its best 12 months the subject keeps today, with controls, with months since the peak and a verdict: lasting, fading, past its

Parameter	Type	Required	Notes
term	string	yes	The moment as people search for it, e.g. "cottage cheese".
article	string	yes	The English Wikipedia article on the same subject, e.g. "Cottage cheese".

Free

$0 forever

Every tool — any call limit is its publisher’s, not ours
No card, and mcprush charges nothing for it
Runs at its publisher’s own address — this marketplace is not in the path
Nothing to cap, because mcprush bills nothing

Nothing here is billable: mcprush charges nothing to install CULT+MATH Decision Briefs or to call it, at any volume.

ATool-list grade · score 93 / 100

Release 1.1.0 · scanned 8 Nov 2026

Graded from the tools this server lists, not from its source code.

Two independent axes, because powerful and malicious are different questions. The grade is threat only. The capability level is blast radius, and it is never a penalty on the grade — it is priced as one subtract-only term in the score, where you can see it.

Threat score100

Client score93

Findings0 threat · 1 capability

Capabilitymoderate

Coveragemanifest

Verificationnot in this report

Surface digest8d1e83a5b9800317466920327e070db1f6290ca077fe4232939483db5e39324d

Score vectorthreat 100 → client 93

Term	Level	What it prices	Points
capability-exposure	moderate	capability blast radius (moderate) — client exposure if the model is manipulated	−3
coverage-honesty	manifest	inspection depth (manifest) — how much of the target the scan could see	−4

score = clamp(round(threatScore − E_cap − E_ver − E_cov), 0, 100). No model, no opinion, no network call at scoring time: the same methodology version against the same bytes always produces this number, and every line above is a field of the report rather than a summary of it.

What the scan could actually read

A grade is only as meaningful as its coverage, so the scanner publishes its own depth before it publishes its result.

The scan read each tool’s name, description, input schema and annotations exactly as the server listed them the last time it answered us; no code was reviewed. We ask the server again about once a month, and a list that changed is graded again.

Tool surfaceread

Implementation sourcenot available

Package metadatanot available

Live transportnot available

The implementation source was not read — this reflects the declared tool metadata only.

Capability — what it could do if the model were manipulated

Tags derived from each tool’s schema and the implementation, not from what the tool calls itself. moderate is the level these add up to.

Tool	Capability tags	Why the tag was assigned
list_decision_briefs	no tags
get_decision_brief	no tags
search_cultmath	no tags
list_decisions	no tags
buy_decision_evidence	external-sink	external-sink: declares readOnlyHint: false, openWorldHint: true
get_decision_evidence	untrusted-input	untrusted-input: declares openWorldHint: true (interacts with entities outside the server)
get_document	no tags
run_filing_trend	untrusted-input	untrusted-input: declares openWorldHint: true (interacts with entities outside the server)
run_regulatory_trend	untrusted-input	untrusted-input: declares openWorldHint: true (interacts with entities outside the server)
run_spend_trend	untrusted-input	untrusted-input: declares openWorldHint: true (interacts with entities outside the server)
run_triangulation	untrusted-input	untrusted-input: declares openWorldHint: true (interacts with entities outside the server)
run_peer_benchmark	untrusted-input	untrusted-input: declares openWorldHint: true (interacts with entities outside the server)
run_ai_visibility	untrusted-input	untrusted-input: keyword "web_search", declares openWorldHint: true (interacts with entities outside the server)
run_disclosure_check	untrusted-input	untrusted-input: declares openWorldHint: true (interacts with entities outside the server)
run_regulatory_clock	untrusted-input	untrusted-input: declares openWorldHint: true (interacts with entities outside the server)
run_deal_activity	untrusted-input	untrusted-input: declares openWorldHint: true (interacts with entities outside the server)
run_demand_check	untrusted-input	untrusted-input: declares openWorldHint: true (interacts with entities outside the server)
run_answer_share	untrusted-input	untrusted-input: declares openWorldHint: true (interacts with entities outside the server)
run_share_of_search	untrusted-input	untrusted-input: declares openWorldHint: true (interacts with entities outside the server)
run_premium_check	untrusted-input	untrusted-input: declares openWorldHint: true (interacts with entities outside the server)
run_angle_demand	untrusted-input	untrusted-input: declares openWorldHint: true (interacts with entities outside the server)
run_channel_mix	untrusted-input	untrusted-input: declares openWorldHint: true (interacts with entities outside the server)
run_claim_check	untrusted-input	untrusted-input: declares openWorldHint: true (interacts with entities outside the server)
run_fad_check	untrusted-input	untrusted-input: declares openWorldHint: true (interacts with entities outside the server)

Toxic-flow graph

The lethal trifecta, checked as a graph rather than as a checklist: untrusted input, a sensitive source and an external sink have to meet before there is a path worth worrying about.

flow-1

Untrusted input can drive an external action even though no sensitive source is exposed.

Supply chain and provenance

Integrityfirst-seen

Surface digest8d1e83a5b9800317

Scanned2026-11-08

This is the first scan of this surface here, so there is nothing yet to compare it against.

Every result on this tab comes from one deterministic pass over the published package — offline, rule by rule, and auditable line by line above. Same methodology version, same bytes, same score.

Where are you running it?

Tool surface

Release history

CULT+MATH Decision Briefs MCP

What it does

Quickstart

Where are you running it?

Tool surface

What counts against your monthly calls

What the scan could actually read

Capability — what it could do if the model were manipulated

Toxic-flow graph

Supply chain and provenance

Release history

See also