Search arXiv papers, download full text, semantic search, citation graphs, and alerts via MCP.
Nothing to run from here
Cybergenic is installed from its publisher's own source and answers where it runs, so this marketplace is not in the path of a single call. There is no address here to send one to, and a panel that pretended otherwise would be showing you an answer we made up. Install it and call it from your own client — the Installation tab has the entry for each one.
9
tools declared
—
trust score
remote
at its publisher
—
calls last 7d
What it does
Cancer gene co-occurrence and exclusivity in tumour cohorts, with confound controls and exact tests.
Quickstart
# 1 — add it to Claude Code
claude mcp add --scope user --transport http cybergenic-mcp 'https://cybergenic.im/mcp?via=mcpregistry'
# 2 — ask your agent for something these tools do
# lookup_gene_pair, gene_partners, search_findings and 6 more
Cybergenic costs nothing on mcprush: there is no plan to choose here, no cap to set and nothing mcprush can bill you for.
Publishernot claimed
CYAll 1 server
cybergenic1 server
1 category
Collected from a public index. Nobody has claimed this account, so nothing here was written by its author — claim it if it is yours.
Installation
Where are you running it?
Every route below installs the same thing and ends at the same approval screen. Nothing here runs on your machine and nothing runs on ours: this server answers at its publisher’s own address, and what you install is the connection straight to it.
Claude Codedeclared by this listing
This is a public server: it answers at its publisher’s own address and this marketplace is not in the path. Claude Code registers it in one command; --scope user makes it available in every project. The transport below is http, as the publisher's own manifest declares it.
claude mcp add --scope user --transport http cybergenic-mcp 'https://cybergenic.im/mcp?via=mcpregistry'Reconnect, or start a new session, and the tools appear in the model’s tool list.
Free on mcprush, and it answers at its publisher’s own address: this marketplace is not in the path, so there is no key of ours to hold and no card to add.
What it writes
One config entry pointing straight at the publisher’s own address — this marketplace is not in the path, and nothing from this listing executes on your machine.
What you approve
9 tools, with what each one reads, writes and reaches shown before you agree — the same list on every route above. Read the tool surface.
Tool surface
What the model actually sees. Descriptions are diffed on every release — see version history.
Measured co-alteration statistics for two genes in every tumour cohort where Cybergenic's discovery scan tested the pair: tumours with both genes altered against the number expected, odds ratio, p-value and Benjamini-Hochberg q over that cohort's whole family of tested pairs, the confound control applied (molecular subtype, lineage or histology strata, with mutation burden conditioned on), and whe
No parameter schema on file.
The genes whose driver mutations co-occur with, or are mutually exclusive with, a given gene in patient tumours, strongest first by Benjamini-Hochberg q, from every pair Cybergenic's discovery scan tested: one row per partner and independent patient source, with the tumours, observed and expected co-alteration and the odds ratio. By default only pairs the scan's own gates keep (significant, a real
No parameter schema on file.
Search Cybergenic's published findings: gene-pair co-occurrence and mutual exclusivity, survival associations, CRISPR gene dependencies and single-gene leads, each with the verdict the engine measured (strengthened, weakened, inconclusive, artifact risk or novel lead) and the reason for it. The query works like the site's search: exact gene symbols, cancer names or abbreviations (NSCLC, CRC, PDAC,
No parameter schema on file.
The full record of one Cybergenic finding, by id or permalink: what was measured and in which cohort, the statistics (the 2x2 table, odds ratio, p and q), the verdict and why, the confound checks, how many papers mention the genes together, CRISPR dependency and survival facts when measured, the prediction locked for it in the hash-chained registry, the same question in other cohorts, and a citati
No parameter schema on file.
Cybergenic's live track record: how many predictions it has locked in its hash-chained registry before re-testing them, how many replicated in an independent cohort against matched controls (including the less-studied-pair subset), and how many findings currently pass every check as both strong and overlooked. Read it before describing how reliable the engine is; it states its own limits, includin
No parameter schema on file.
Fisher's exact test for a 2x2 table [[a, b], [c, d]]: two-sided and both one-sided p-values (computed in log space, so a tiny p keeps its real exponent), the sample odds ratio, and the conditional maximum-likelihood odds ratio with its exact confidence interval (what R's fisher.test reports). For two genes: a = tumours with both altered, b = gene A only, c = gene B only, d = neither. Up to 100,000
No parameter schema on file.
Pearson chi-square test of independence for an r x c table of counts (2x2 up to 10x10), with Yates' correction for 2x2 tables and the G-test: statistic, degrees of freedom, p-value, expected counts, adjusted residuals, Cramér's V, whether Cochran's rule for the approximation holds, and Fisher's exact test when the table is 2x2. Empty rows and columns are dropped and reported.
No parameter schema on file.
Effect sizes for a 2x2 table [[a, b], [c, d]] whose rows are two groups and whose columns are outcome yes and no: the odds ratio (Woolf interval, and the conditional exact interval), the relative risk (Katz interval), the risk difference (Newcombe interval) and the number needed to treat, at the chosen confidence level, plus Fisher's exact p. A zero cell applies the Haldane-Anscombe correction to
No parameter schema on file.
Multiple-testing correction for a list of p-values: Benjamini-Hochberg q-values and Benjamini-Yekutieli, Holm, Hochberg and Bonferroni adjusted p-values, the number of discoveries at alpha for each method, and the Benjamini-Hochberg cutoff rank. Pass family_size when more tests were run than the p-values supplied (for example only the top hits were kept). Up to 10,000 p-values per call; the same i
No parameter schema on file.
Free
$0 forever
- Every tool — any call limit is its publisher’s, not ours
- No card, and mcprush charges nothing for it
- Runs at its publisher’s own address — this marketplace is not in the path
- Nothing to cap, because mcprush bills nothing
What counts against your monthly calls
| Tool | Unit | Calls used | Out of the allowance |
|---|
Nothing here is billable: mcprush charges nothing to install Cybergenic or to call it, at any volume.
Call allowance · this installenforced at the gateway
Monthly allowance, in calls
—
—
Alert at 80% · then the tool returns a normal MCP error
Used this month: —
—Grade not published
No rule-by-rule report on file for this release
Two independent axes, because powerful and malicious are different questions. The grade is threat only. The capability level is blast radius, and it is never a penalty on the grade — it is priced as one subtract-only term in the score, where you can see it.
This listing is an address its publisher runs, and you connect to it directly — this marketplace is not in the path. The scanner reads packages and public source, and an address is neither. So there is no grade — not a withheld one, an unmeasured one.
Release history
This is an address its publisher runs: which release it serves is theirs to choose, so there is nothing here to pin. The history below is for reading; the current release on file is 1.0.0.
1.0.0
undated
latestNo release note was published with this version.
—
no reviews yet
Who can review
One review per account, from a signed-in account that does not publish this listing. Nothing else is asked — you can say what you think before you install it. Publishers can reply once per review, and a review can be edited or deleted by whoever wrote it.
Sign in to write one
Any signed-in account that does not publish Cybergenic can review it, once — before installing it or after. A review from an account that has installed it is marked as one.
No reviews yet
Nobody has reviewed this listing. The rating on the card is the mean of the reviews written here and nothing else, so there is no rating until somebody writes the first — which takes a signed-in account that does not publish it, and nothing else.