Alpaca Trading API integration for Model Context Protocol (MCP)
Nothing to run from here
X402 Solana is installed from its publisher's own source and answers where it runs, so this marketplace is not in the path of a single call. There is no address here to send one to, and a panel that pretended otherwise would be showing you an answer we made up. Install it and call it from your own client — the Installation tab has the entry for each one.
96/100
tool-list score
10
tools declared
remote
at its publisher
—
calls last 7d
What it does
x402 paid API tools for AI agents on Solana: crypto safety, market data, KYB/AML verification.
Quickstart
# 1 — add it to Claude Code
claude mcp add --scope user --transport http x402-solana-mcp https://x402-solana-cva8.onrender.com/mcp/
# 2 — ask your agent for something these tools do
# gleif_lei, sanctions_screen, polymarket_odds and 7 more
X402 Solana costs nothing on mcprush: there is no plan to choose here, no cap to set and nothing mcprush can bill you for.
Publishernot claimed
DCAll 2 servers
digitalweb33333-creator2 servers
1 category
Collected from a public index. Nobody has claimed this account, so nothing here was written by its author — claim it if it is yours.
Installation
Where are you running it?
Every route below installs the same thing and ends at the same approval screen. Nothing here runs on your machine and nothing runs on ours: this server answers at its publisher’s own address, and what you install is the connection straight to it.
Claude Codedeclared by this listing
This is a public server: it answers at its publisher’s own address and this marketplace is not in the path. Claude Code registers it in one command; --scope user makes it available in every project. The transport below is http, as the publisher's own manifest declares it.
claude mcp add --scope user --transport http x402-solana-mcp https://x402-solana-cva8.onrender.com/mcp/Reconnect, or start a new session, and the tools appear in the model’s tool list.
Free on mcprush, and it answers at its publisher’s own address: this marketplace is not in the path, so there is no key of ours to hold and no card to add.
What it writes
One config entry pointing straight at the publisher’s own address — this marketplace is not in the path, and nothing from this listing executes on your machine.
What you approve
10 tools, with what each one reads, writes and reaches shown before you agree — the same list on every route above. Read the tool surface.
Tool surface
What the model actually sees. Descriptions are diffed on every release — see version history.
Look up any Legal Entity Identifier (LEI) for company information lookup and counterparty / know-your-business (KYB) identity against the official GLEIF global registry — returns legal name, status, jurisdiction, legal form and registered address, real-time, worldwide coverage. Price: $0.01 per call (x402 payment, USDC on Base mainnet).
| Parameter | Type | Required | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| lei | string | yes | 20-character LEI, e.g. '529900T8BM49AURSDO55' |
Screen a name against the official EU consolidated sanctions list (FISMA) for anti-money-laundering (AML) and watchlist checks — returns matches with a similarity score and context (EU reference, type, programme), not a binary yes/no. Price: $0.05 per call (x402 payment, USDC on Base mainnet).
| Parameter | Type | Required | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| name | string | yes | Name to screen (person or entity), e.g. 'Saddam Hussein' |
| type | string | no | Optional: 'person' or 'enterprise' |
| threshold | number | no | Min similarity 0-1 to report a match (default 0.7) |
| limit | integer | no | Max matches [1-50], e.g. 10 |
Live prediction market odds, implied probabilities and betting-market data from Polymarket — give a market id or slug, get each outcome with its probability (0-1), volume, liquidity and resolution status. Price: $0.05 per call (x402 payment, USDC on Base mainnet).
| Parameter | Type | Required | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| market | string | yes | Polymarket market id or slug, e.g. '2654605' or 'will-it-rain-tomorrow' |
Token safety check before buying — is this token a honeypot or a rug pull? Bundles honeypot detection, buy/sell tax, holder concentration, LP lock and liquidity (GoPlus, Honeypot.is, DexScreener) into a single 0-100 token security risk score with a clear buy/avoid verdict. One call replaces three lookups. EVM chains. Price: $0.05 per call (x402 payment, USDC on Base mainnet).
| Parameter | Type | Required | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| token | string | yes | Token contract address (0x + 40 hex), e.g. '0x833589...2913' |
| chain | string | no | base | ethereum | bsc | polygon | arbitrum | optimism | avalanche (default base) |
One-call GO/CAUTION/NO-GO pre-trade verdict for AI trading agents: fuses token safety (honeypot, rug, tax, holders), counterparty wallet sanctions screening (OFAC/mixer) and cross-exchange market signal into a single decision with a signed, offline-verifiable receipt. Should I buy this token now? Replaces three separate calls (token-safety + wallet-screen + signal) with one fused GO/NO-GO verdict.
| Parameter | Type | Required | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| token | string | yes | Token contract (EVM 0x+40hex) or SPL mint (base58) to evaluate |
| chain | string | no | base | ethereum | bsc | polygon | arbitrum | optimism | avalanche | solana (default base) |
| wallet | string | no | Optional counterparty wallet to screen (OFAC/mixer) |
Full degen token dossier in one call: safety score + honeypot/tax + detailed TOP HOLDERS and concentration + liquidity/FDV/volume/pool-age + contract control (owner, creator, mintable, open-source) + an AI red-flag narrative. Deep due-diligence report on a token before aping — the premium tier above a plain safety check. EVM chains and Solana. Price: $0.10 per call (x402 payment, USDC on Base main
| Parameter | Type | Required | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| token | string | yes | Token contract (EVM 0x+40hex) or SPL mint (base58) |
| chain | string | no | base | ethereum | bsc | polygon | arbitrum | optimism | avalanche | solana (default base) |
Solana SPL token safety, rug check and honeypot / scam detection before trading: is this Solana token a rug pull, honeypot or scam? Verdict SAFE/RISKY/CRITICAL + 0-100 score combining STATIC checks (mint/freeze authority, holder concentration) AND BEHAVIORAL analysis (liquidity, churn, recent dump, tx velocity) plus a blue-chip false-positive guard so USDC/USDT/SOL are never flagged. Pre-trade SPL
| Parameter | Type | Required | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| mint | string | yes | SPL token mint address (base58), e.g. 'EPjFW...Dt1v' (USDC) |
| deep | boolean | no | Deeper behavioral + holder analysis (more RPC calls) |
All-in-one Solana pre-trade decision in ONE call: BUY-SAFE/CAUTION/AVOID fusing four scored modules — token security, EXECUTABLE liquidity depth (estimated slippage at $100/$1k/$10k), deployer history/control and holder concentration. Should I buy or avoid this Solana token? Full token due-diligence in one call — replaces 3-4 lookups; built for a trading / sniping agent's risk-review pipeline. Sol
| Parameter | Type | Required | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| mint | string | yes | SPL token mint address (base58) to evaluate before buying |
Quick check of where an x402 seller ranks RIGHT NOW by keyword-relevance in the CDP Bazaar discovery (not the raw settled-volume rank the free explorers show): best rank + per-category-keyword rank in one cheap call, plus a pointer to the full /agent/visibility-audit when the rank slips. The frequent pulse for monitoring your x402 discoverability. Where do I rank now? Am I being out-ranked on my c
| Parameter | Type | Required | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| seller | string | yes | Seller to check: wallet (0x + 40 hex or Solana base58) or origin URL/domain, e.g. 'api.example.com' |
Audit how discoverable an x402 agent/seller is across the agent registries (CDP Bazaar, 402index): keyword-RELEVANCE rank per category (not raw settled-volume rank), a metadata-quality score of your advertised endpoints (schema, output.example, tags, llm_usage_prompt), settle activity, a top-3 benchmark, prioritized fixes, and a DELTA vs a signed snapshot you carry back. Why am I not being found a
| Parameter | Type | Required | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| seller | string | yes | Seller to audit: wallet (0x + 40 hex or Solana base58) or origin URL/domain, e.g. 'api.example.com' |
| snapshot | string | no | Optional: the signed_snapshot JSON from a previous audit, to compute a dated delta |
Free
$0 forever
- Every tool — any call limit is its publisher’s, not ours
- No card, and mcprush charges nothing for it
- Runs at its publisher’s own address — this marketplace is not in the path
- Nothing to cap, because mcprush bills nothing
What counts against your monthly calls
| Tool | Unit | Calls used | Out of the allowance |
|---|
Nothing here is billable: mcprush charges nothing to install X402 Solana or to call it, at any volume.
Call allowance · this installenforced at the gateway
Monthly allowance, in calls
—
—
Alert at 80% · then the tool returns a normal MCP error
Used this month: —
ATool-list grade · score 96 / 100
Release 0.1.0 · scanned 20 Oct 2026
Graded from the tools this server lists, not from its source code.
Two independent axes, because powerful and malicious are different questions. The grade is threat only. The capability level is blast radius, and it is never a penalty on the grade — it is priced as one subtract-only term in the score, where you can see it.
Threat score100
Client score96
Findings0 threat · 0 capability
Capabilityminimal
Coveragemanifest
Verificationnot in this report
Surface digest5073c77d38b230c2379273b360471ce316a36f03c307cb7dfba65a4c4c85018e
Score vectorthreat 100 → client 96
| Term | Level | What it prices | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
| capability-exposure | minimal | capability blast radius (minimal) — client exposure if the model is manipulated | −0 |
| coverage-honesty | manifest | inspection depth (manifest) — how much of the target the scan could see | −4 |
score = clamp(round(threatScore − E_cap − E_ver − E_cov), 0, 100). No model, no opinion, no network call at scoring time: the same methodology version against the same bytes always produces this number, and every line above is a field of the report rather than a summary of it.
What the scan could actually read
A grade is only as meaningful as its coverage, so the scanner publishes its own depth before it publishes its result.
The scan read each tool’s name, description, input schema and annotations exactly as the server listed them the last time it answered us; no code was reviewed. We ask the server again about once a month, and a list that changed is graded again.
Tool surfaceread
Implementation sourcenot available
Package metadatanot available
Live transportnot available
The implementation source was not read — this reflects the declared tool metadata only.
Capability — what it could do if the model were manipulated
Tags derived from each tool’s schema and the implementation, not from what the tool calls itself. minimal is the level these add up to.
| Tool | Capability tags | Why the tag was assigned |
|---|---|---|
| gleif_lei | no tags | |
| sanctions_screen | no tags | |
| polymarket_odds | no tags | |
| crypto_token_safety | no tags | |
| crypto_pre_trade_verdict | no tags | |
| crypto_token_dossier | no tags | |
| solana_token_safety | no tags | |
| solana_pre_trade | no tags | |
| agent_rank_check | no tags | |
| agent_visibility_audit | no tags |
Toxic-flow graph
The lethal trifecta, checked as a graph rather than as a checklist: untrusted input, a sensitive source and an external sink have to meet before there is a path worth worrying about.
The public result for this release does not print the flow graph, so there is nothing to show here. That is not the same as "no paths were found": what the scan did read is above, under coverage.
Supply chain and provenance
Integrityfirst-seen
Surface digest5073c77d38b230c2
Scanned2026-10-20
This is the first scan of this surface here, so there is nothing yet to compare it against.
Every result on this tab comes from one deterministic pass over the published package — offline, rule by rule, and auditable line by line above. Same methodology version, same bytes, same score.
Release history
This is an address its publisher runs: which release it serves is theirs to choose, so there is nothing here to pin. The history below is for reading; the current release on file is 0.1.0.
0.1.0
undated
latestNo release note was published with this version.
—
no reviews yet
Who can review
One review per account, from a signed-in account that does not publish this listing. Nothing else is asked — you can say what you think before you install it. Publishers can reply once per review, and a review can be edited or deleted by whoever wrote it.
Sign in to write one
Any signed-in account that does not publish X402 Solana can review it, once — before installing it or after. A review from an account that has installed it is marked as one.
No reviews yet
Nobody has reviewed this listing. The rating on the card is the mean of the reviews written here and nothing else, so there is no rating until somebody writes the first — which takes a signed-in account that does not publish it, and nothing else.