Comprehensive Model Context Protocol server for managing Home Assistant through AI assistants.
Nothing to run from here
Ballot Box — Electronic Voting Legal Resources · AI Ballot is installed from its publisher's own source and answers where it runs, so this marketplace is not in the path of a single call. There is no address here to send one to, and a panel that pretended otherwise would be showing you an answer we made up. Install it and call it from your own client — the Installation tab has the entry for each one.
96/100
tool-list score
18
tools declared
remote
at its publisher
—
calls last 7d
What it does
Korean e-voting statutes, quorum judgement, fee quote and consult request. 10 tools, no auth.
Quickstart
# 1 — add it to Claude Code
claude mcp add --scope user --transport http ballot-box-electronic-voting-legal-resources-mcp https://vote.easykmarket.com/api/mcp
# 2 — ask your agent for something these tools do
# list_laws, get_statute, list_resolution_types and 15 more
Ballot Box — Electronic Voting Legal Resources · AI Ballot costs nothing on mcprush: there is no plan to choose here, no cap to set and nothing mcprush can bill you for.
Publishernot claimed
EAAll 1 server
easykmarket1 server
1 category
Collected from a public index. Nobody has claimed this account, so nothing here was written by its author — claim it if it is yours.
Installation
Where are you running it?
Every route below installs the same thing and ends at the same approval screen. Nothing here runs on your machine and nothing runs on ours: this server answers at its publisher’s own address, and what you install is the connection straight to it.
Claude Codedeclared by this listing
This is a public server: it answers at its publisher’s own address and this marketplace is not in the path. Claude Code registers it in one command; --scope user makes it available in every project. The transport below is http, as the publisher's own manifest declares it.
claude mcp add --scope user --transport http ballot-box-electronic-voting-legal-resources-mcp https://vote.easykmarket.com/api/mcpReconnect, or start a new session, and the tools appear in the model’s tool list.
Free on mcprush, and it answers at its publisher’s own address: this marketplace is not in the path, so there is no key of ours to hold and no card to add.
What it writes
One config entry pointing straight at the publisher’s own address — this marketplace is not in the path, and nothing from this listing executes on your machine.
What you approve
18 tools, with what each one reads, writes and reaches shown before you agree — the same list on every route above. Read the tool surface.
Tool surface
What the model actually sees. Descriptions are diffed on every release — see version history.
투표함이 추적하는 한국 법령 목록 — 시행일·공포일·대조일·추적 조문·시행 예정 개정. 출처 국가법령정보센터.
No parameter schema on file.
법령 하나의 조문 원문(조·항·호)과 개정 꼬리표, 투표함이 그 조문을 어떻게 지키는지(적용 내용), 관련 안건 유형. law 에는 법령 이름(예: 집합건물의 소유 및 관리에 관한 법률) 또는 slug(condominium), article 에는 "제38조" 처럼. article 을 비우면 추적 조문 전부.
| Parameter | Type | Required | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| law | string | yes | — |
| article | string | no | — |
단체 유형(집합건물 관리단·아파트·정비사업조합·노동조합·사단법인·협동조합·주택조합·학교법인·학생자치·그 밖)별 안건 유형과 정족수 요약.
| Parameter | Type | Required | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| group | string | no | 단체 유형 키 (bldg, apt, redev, union, assoc, coop, housing, school, student, etc). 비우면 전부 |
안건 유형 하나의 의결정족수(인원·의결권), 근거 조문, 전자투표 가능 여부와 근거, 소집통지 요건, 본인확인 등급, 명부 필요 여부, 주의사항.
| Parameter | Type | Required | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| key | string | yes | 예: bldg_general, bldg_bylaw, redev_general, apt_rep_multi |
표 수와 의결권을 넣어 가결·부결을 판정한다. 투표함이 개표에 쓰는 함수 그대로. 집합건물은 구분소유자 수와 의결권(면적)을 모두 넣어야 두 요건이 판정된다.
| Parameter | Type | Required | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| preset | string | yes | — |
| eligibleCount | number | no | 재적 인원 |
| attendeeCount | number | no | 출석(투표) 인원 |
| approveCount | number | no | 찬성 인원 |
| eligibleWeight | number | no | 재적 의결권 합 |
| castWeight | number | no | — |
| approveWeight | number | no | — |
| directAttendanceCount | number | no | 직접 출석 인원(정비사업) |
이 안건을 전자투표로 할 수 있는가 — 법이 직접 허용 / 규약·정관 근거 필요 / 불가(전자서명 요구 등) — 와 그 근거 조문.
| Parameter | Type | Required | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| key | string | yes | — |
추적 법령의 시행일·공포일·조문별 개정 꼬리표·투표함 반영 내용과 시행 예정 개정.
No parameter schema on file.
질문·안건 이름·법령 이름으로 안건 유형과 법령을 찾는다. 예: "관리규약 개정", "재건축 총회 정족수", "집합건물법".
| Parameter | Type | Required | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| query | string | yes | — |
투표 인원으로 세 갈래(AI 투표함·직접 투표함·맞춤 투표함) 요금을 계산한다. 부가세 포함 금액.
| Parameter | Type | Required | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| people | integer | yes | — |
집회 초안을 만든다. 초안은 "확인 대기" 상태라 아무것도 열리지 않는다 — 돌려받은 confirmUrl 을 주최자(관리인)에게 전달하면 주최자가 내용을 검토하고 체크한 뒤 휴대폰 본인인증·결제를 해야 투표가 열린다. 관리 토큰은 주최자가 받으며, 운영을 맡길지는 주최자가 정한다. 집합건물(bldg)은 agendas[].preset 에 bldg_general / bldg_bylaw / bldg_common_change 등 법정 유형을 넣고, closesAt(전자투표 마감)은 paperClosesAt(집회일) 전날까지여야 한다. roster 는 선택이며 넣을 때는 서버에 원문을 보내지 않는다: 각 사람의 hash = sha256("voter:" + 이름 + "|" + 생년월일(YYYYMMDD) + "|" +
| Parameter | Type | Required | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| agent | string | no | 에이전트 이름 (기록용) |
| orgType | string | yes | — |
| title | string | yes | — |
| declaredCount | integer | yes | 투표할 수 있는 사람 수(구분소유자 수 등) |
| agendas | array | yes | — |
| closesAt | string | yes | 전자투표 마감 ISO 8601 |
| paperClosesAt | string | no | 현장·서면 접수 마감(집회일) ISO 8601. 집합건물은 closesAt 다음 날 이후 |
| isAnonymous | boolean | no | — |
| useWeighted | boolean | no | etc 만 고른다. 법정 안건은 법이 정한다 |
| roster | array | no | — |
초안이 확인됐는지, 결제됐는지, 투표가 열렸는지 본다. 확인 전에는 confirmToken, 확인 뒤에는 주최자가 넘겨준 manageToken 을 token 에 넣는다.
| Parameter | Type | Required | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| draftId | string | yes | — |
| token | string | yes | — |
운영자가 대신 개설·집계하는 맞춤 투표함(1인당 300원)을 신청한다. 담당자가 연락한다. 담당자 이름·연락처가 필요하다.
| Parameter | Type | Required | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| orgName | string | yes | — |
| contactName | string | yes | — |
| contactPhone | string | yes | — |
| contactEmail | string | no | — |
| headCount | integer | no | — |
| orgType | string | no | — |
| message | string | no | — |
집회의 결제 상태·안건별 집계·명부 현황. manageToken 필요.
| Parameter | Type | Required | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| meetingId | string | yes | — |
| manageToken | string | yes | — |
선거인 명부(해시)를 모든 안건에 올린다. 원문은 보내지 않는다 — create_draft_meeting 의 hash 규칙과 같다. manageToken 필요.
| Parameter | Type | Required | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| meetingId | string | yes | — |
| manageToken | string | yes | — |
| entries | array | yes | — |
소집통지를 한 날짜·방법·대상 수를 기록한다(모든 안건). manageToken 필요.
| Parameter | Type | Required | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| meetingId | string | yes | — |
| manageToken | string | yes | — |
| notifiedOn | string | yes | YYYY-MM-DD |
| method | string | yes | — |
| recipients | integer | no | — |
| note | string | no | — |
서면결의서(현장 표)를 입력한다. 한 사람 = 명부 해시 + 안건별 선택지 id. 증빙 사진(data:image/… URL)이 반드시 필요하다. 전자투표한 사람이 섞이면 묶음 전체가 거절된다. manageToken 필요.
| Parameter | Type | Required | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| meetingId | string | yes | — |
| manageToken | string | yes | — |
| voters | array | yes | — |
| evidenceImageDataUrl | string | yes | — |
| note | string | no | — |
모든 안건을 지금 마감하고 결과를 확정한다. 공고한 마감보다 일찍 닫으면 결의가 다투어질 수 있다 — 주최자가 지시한 경우에만. manageToken 필요.
| Parameter | Type | Required | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| meetingId | string | yes | — |
| manageToken | string | yes | — |
| confirm | boolean | yes | — |
집회 전체 결과보고서(안건별 표수·의결권·판정·근거·검증값). 마감 전에는 봉인(sealed). manageToken 필요.
| Parameter | Type | Required | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| meetingId | string | yes | — |
| manageToken | string | yes | — |
Free
$0 forever
- Every tool — any call limit is its publisher’s, not ours
- No card, and mcprush charges nothing for it
- Runs at its publisher’s own address — this marketplace is not in the path
- Nothing to cap, because mcprush bills nothing
What counts against your monthly calls
| Tool | Unit | Calls used | Out of the allowance |
|---|
Nothing here is billable: mcprush charges nothing to install Ballot Box — Electronic Voting Legal Resources · AI Ballot or to call it, at any volume.
Call allowance · this installenforced at the gateway
Monthly allowance, in calls
—
—
Alert at 80% · then the tool returns a normal MCP error
Used this month: —
ATool-list grade · score 96 / 100
Release 1.2.0 · scanned 4 Nov 2026
Graded from the tools this server lists, not from its source code.
Two independent axes, because powerful and malicious are different questions. The grade is threat only. The capability level is blast radius, and it is never a penalty on the grade — it is priced as one subtract-only term in the score, where you can see it.
Threat score100
Client score96
Findings0 threat · 0 capability
Capabilityminimal
Coveragemanifest
Verificationnot in this report
Surface digest842c11f6ef4a9acdae824050766d44c4d1d5f2898d9079d7553e306cd046e63a
Score vectorthreat 100 → client 96
| Term | Level | What it prices | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
| capability-exposure | minimal | capability blast radius (minimal) — client exposure if the model is manipulated | −0 |
| coverage-honesty | manifest | inspection depth (manifest) — how much of the target the scan could see | −4 |
score = clamp(round(threatScore − E_cap − E_ver − E_cov), 0, 100). No model, no opinion, no network call at scoring time: the same methodology version against the same bytes always produces this number, and every line above is a field of the report rather than a summary of it.
What the scan could actually read
A grade is only as meaningful as its coverage, so the scanner publishes its own depth before it publishes its result.
The scan read each tool’s name, description, input schema and annotations exactly as the server listed them the last time it answered us; no code was reviewed. We ask the server again about once a month, and a list that changed is graded again.
Tool surfaceread
Implementation sourcenot available
Package metadatanot available
Live transportnot available
The implementation source was not read — this reflects the declared tool metadata only.
Capability — what it could do if the model were manipulated
Tags derived from each tool’s schema and the implementation, not from what the tool calls itself. minimal is the level these add up to.
| Tool | Capability tags | Why the tag was assigned |
|---|---|---|
| list_laws | no tags | |
| get_statute | no tags | |
| list_resolution_types | no tags | |
| get_resolution_requirement | no tags | |
| judge_resolution | no tags | |
| electronic_voting_basis | no tags | |
| law_changelog | no tags | |
| search | no tags | |
| get_quote | no tags | |
| create_draft_meeting | no tags | |
| get_draft_status | no tags | |
| request_consult | no tags | |
| get_dashboard | no tags | |
| upload_roster | no tags | |
| record_notice | no tags | |
| enter_paper_ballots | no tags | |
| close_meeting | no tags | |
| get_report | no tags |
Toxic-flow graph
The lethal trifecta, checked as a graph rather than as a checklist: untrusted input, a sensitive source and an external sink have to meet before there is a path worth worrying about.
The public result for this release does not print the flow graph, so there is nothing to show here. That is not the same as "no paths were found": what the scan did read is above, under coverage.
Supply chain and provenance
Integrityfirst-seen
Surface digest842c11f6ef4a9acd
Scanned2026-11-04
This is the first scan of this surface here, so there is nothing yet to compare it against.
Every result on this tab comes from one deterministic pass over the published package — offline, rule by rule, and auditable line by line above. Same methodology version, same bytes, same score.
Release history
This is an address its publisher runs: which release it serves is theirs to choose, so there is nothing here to pin. The history below is for reading; the current release on file is 1.2.0.
1.2.0
undated
latestNo release note was published with this version.
—
no reviews yet
Who can review
One review per account, from a signed-in account that does not publish this listing. Nothing else is asked — you can say what you think before you install it. Publishers can reply once per review, and a review can be edited or deleted by whoever wrote it.
Sign in to write one
Any signed-in account that does not publish Ballot Box — Electronic Voting Legal Resources · AI Ballot can review it, once — before installing it or after. A review from an account that has installed it is marked as one.
No reviews yet
Nobody has reviewed this listing. The rating on the card is the mean of the reviews written here and nothing else, so there is no rating until somebody writes the first — which takes a signed-in account that does not publish it, and nothing else.