Comprehensive Model Context Protocol server for managing Home Assistant through AI assistants.
Nothing to run from here
EasyLPD: Swiss data protection (FADP) and GDPR is installed from its publisher's own source and answers where it runs, so this marketplace is not in the path of a single call. There is no address here to send one to, and a panel that pretended otherwise would be showing you an answer we made up. Install it and call it from your own client — the Installation tab has the entry for each one.
96/100
tool-list score
8
tools declared
remote
at its publisher
—
calls last 7d
What it does
Swiss FADP (nLPD/revDSG) and GDPR: which laws apply, action plan, templates, transfers abroad.
Quickstart
# 1 — add it to Claude Code
claude mcp add --scope user --transport http easylpd-swiss-data-protection-fadp-and-gdpr-mcp https://easylpd.ch/api/mcp
# 2 — ask your agent for something these tools do
# which_laws_apply, assessment_questions, score_assessment and 5 more
EasyLPD: Swiss data protection (FADP) and GDPR costs nothing on mcprush: there is no plan to choose here, no cap to set and nothing mcprush can bill you for.
Publishernot claimed
EAAll 1 server
easylpd1 server
1 category
Collected from a public index. Nobody has claimed this account, so nothing here was written by its author — claim it if it is yours.
Installation
Where are you running it?
Every route below installs the same thing and ends at the same approval screen. Nothing here runs on your machine and nothing runs on ours: this server answers at its publisher’s own address, and what you install is the connection straight to it.
Claude Codedeclared by this listing
This is a public server: it answers at its publisher’s own address and this marketplace is not in the path. Claude Code registers it in one command; --scope user makes it available in every project. The transport below is http, as the publisher's own manifest declares it.
claude mcp add --scope user --transport http easylpd-swiss-data-protection-fadp-and-gdpr-mcp https://easylpd.ch/api/mcpReconnect, or start a new session, and the tools appear in the model’s tool list.
Free on mcprush, and it answers at its publisher’s own address: this marketplace is not in the path, so there is no key of ours to hold and no card to add.
What it writes
One config entry pointing straight at the publisher’s own address — this marketplace is not in the path, and nothing from this listing executes on your machine.
What you approve
8 tools, with what each one reads, writes and reaches shown before you agree — the same list on every route above. Read the tool surface.
Tool surface
What the model actually sees. Descriptions are diffed on every release — see version history.
Use first when someone asks which data protection laws their organisation must follow (Swiss FADP/nLPD/DSG, EU GDPR, EU AI Act), for example a Swiss company selling online to the EU. Returns the core obligations that follow for that profile and those that only one of the two laws asks, each with the articles of each law and the template that carries it out. Tells whether the Swiss Federal Act on D
| Parameter | Type | Required | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| ch | boolean | yes | Established in Switzerland, or processing data of people in Switzerland. |
| euEstablishment | boolean | yes | Has an establishment (branch, subsidiary, office) in the EU/EEA. |
| euOffer | boolean | yes | Offers goods or services to people in the EU/EEA. |
| euMonitoring | boolean | yes | Monitors the behaviour of people in the EU/EEA (online tracking, profiling). |
| ai | boolean | no | Uses AI systems in its work (AI assistants, chatbots, automated screening or scoring). |
| lang | string | no | Language of the answer: it, de, fr or en. |
Use when someone wants to check where their organisation stands with data protection. The questions of EasyLPD's self-assessment that apply to an organisation's profile, each with its id, area, why it matters, its weight and the legal references. Ask them in the conversation, a few at a time, answer each with yes, partial, no, unknown (the person does not know: it counts as not in place until chec
| Parameter | Type | Required | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| ch | boolean | yes | Established in Switzerland, or processing data of people in Switzerland. |
| euEstablishment | boolean | yes | Has an establishment (branch, subsidiary, office) in the EU/EEA. |
| euOffer | boolean | yes | Offers goods or services to people in the EU/EEA. |
| euMonitoring | boolean | yes | Monitors the behaviour of people in the EU/EEA (online tracking, profiling). |
| ai | boolean | no | Uses AI systems in its work (AI assistants, chatbots, automated screening or scoring). |
| lang | string | no | Language of the answer: it, de, fr or en. |
| freeOnly | boolean | no | Only the questions of the free assessment (true) or all (false). |
Use after the questions of assessment_questions have been answered. Scores them per applicable law, with the risk level and the three gaps to start from, and returns openInEasyLPD: a link that shows the same result in EasyLPD, to give to the user. Guidance, not legal advice or a certification.
| Parameter | Type | Required | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| ch | boolean | yes | Established in Switzerland, or processing data of people in Switzerland. |
| euEstablishment | boolean | yes | Has an establishment (branch, subsidiary, office) in the EU/EEA. |
| euOffer | boolean | yes | Offers goods or services to people in the EU/EEA. |
| euMonitoring | boolean | yes | Monitors the behaviour of people in the EU/EEA (online tracking, profiling). |
| ai | boolean | no | Uses AI systems in its work (AI assistants, chatbots, automated screening or scoring). |
| lang | string | no | Language of the answer: it, de, fr or en. |
| answers | object | yes | Answers by question id: yes, partial, no, unknown or na. |
Use when someone asks whether they may use a provider or send personal data to another country (cloud, hosting, CRM, US services). Whether sending personal data to a country is allowed without further safeguards under the Swiss FADP and under the EU GDPR (adequacy lists), by ISO 3166-1 alpha-2 country code. The lists change: check them before relying on the answer.
| Parameter | Type | Required | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| country | string | yes | ISO 3166-1 alpha-2 code, e.g. US, DE, JP. |
| lang | string | no | Language of the answer: it, de, fr or en. |
Use for an overview of the new Swiss FADP/nLPD/revDSG. The main duties of the Swiss Federal Act on Data Protection (in force since 1 September 2023) for SMEs, each with its FADP and GDPR articles: who it applies to, the risk, eight duties. For what a given organisation must do, prefer action_plan. A summary, not legal advice.
| Parameter | Type | Required | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| lang | string | no | Language of the answer: it, de, fr or en. |
Use when someone asks what their organisation must do about data protection, or how to start. The steps that apply to its profile under the Swiss FADP, the GDPR and the AI Act, in the order EasyLPD's path follows (six stages), each with the articles of each law, its weight, why it matters and the template that carries it out with the link to its page. With answers from assessment_questions, the st
| Parameter | Type | Required | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| ch | boolean | yes | Established in Switzerland, or processing data of people in Switzerland. |
| euEstablishment | boolean | yes | Has an establishment (branch, subsidiary, office) in the EU/EEA. |
| euOffer | boolean | yes | Offers goods or services to people in the EU/EEA. |
| euMonitoring | boolean | yes | Monitors the behaviour of people in the EU/EEA (online tracking, profiling). |
| ai | boolean | no | Uses AI systems in its work (AI assistants, chatbots, automated screening or scoring). |
| lang | string | no | Language of the answer: it, de, fr or en. |
| answers | object | no | Optional answers by question id: steps answered yes or na are left out. |
Use when someone needs a privacy notice, a processor agreement (DPA), a breach procedure, a DPIA or another data protection document under the Swiss FADP or the GDPR. The 39 templates of EasyLPD with what each is for and the link to its page; with an id, one template with the headings of its sections, the beginning of its text and where the FADP and the GDPR ask different things. Optional search b
| Parameter | Type | Required | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| lang | string | no | Language of the answer: it, de, fr or en. |
| search | string | no | Words to look for in title or purpose, e.g. 'video', 'processor'. |
| id | string | no | The id of one template, from a previous answer: its details. |
Use when someone asks a common question on the Swiss FADP/nLPD/revDSG: whether it applies, differences with the GDPR, what changed in 2023, fines, personal and sensitive data, consent, the FDPIC, the Swiss representative, the record of processing, retention, security measures, privacy by design, a data protection advisor (DPO), privacy notices, DPIA, profiling, training, certification, transfers a
| Parameter | Type | Required | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| lang | string | no | Language of the answer: it, de, fr or en. |
| id | string | no | The id of one question, from the list. |
Free
$0 forever
- Every tool — any call limit is its publisher’s, not ours
- No card, and mcprush charges nothing for it
- Runs at its publisher’s own address — this marketplace is not in the path
- Nothing to cap, because mcprush bills nothing
What counts against your monthly calls
| Tool | Unit | Calls used | Out of the allowance |
|---|
Nothing here is billable: mcprush charges nothing to install EasyLPD: Swiss data protection (FADP) and GDPR or to call it, at any volume.
Call allowance · this installenforced at the gateway
Monthly allowance, in calls
—
—
Alert at 80% · then the tool returns a normal MCP error
Used this month: —
ATool-list grade · score 96 / 100
Release 1.0.0 · scanned 27 Oct 2026
Graded from the tools this server lists, not from its source code.
Two independent axes, because powerful and malicious are different questions. The grade is threat only. The capability level is blast radius, and it is never a penalty on the grade — it is priced as one subtract-only term in the score, where you can see it.
Threat score100
Client score96
Findings0 threat · 0 capability
Capabilityminimal
Coveragemanifest
Verificationnot in this report
Surface digest25ef3554048b1617b901c2b5be6befe045bbfc78eee7c0c5307ce23b90a64433
Score vectorthreat 100 → client 96
| Term | Level | What it prices | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
| capability-exposure | minimal | capability blast radius (minimal) — client exposure if the model is manipulated | −0 |
| coverage-honesty | manifest | inspection depth (manifest) — how much of the target the scan could see | −4 |
score = clamp(round(threatScore − E_cap − E_ver − E_cov), 0, 100). No model, no opinion, no network call at scoring time: the same methodology version against the same bytes always produces this number, and every line above is a field of the report rather than a summary of it.
What the scan could actually read
A grade is only as meaningful as its coverage, so the scanner publishes its own depth before it publishes its result.
The scan read each tool’s name, description, input schema and annotations exactly as the server listed them the last time it answered us; no code was reviewed. We ask the server again about once a month, and a list that changed is graded again.
Tool surfaceread
Implementation sourcenot available
Package metadatanot available
Live transportnot available
The implementation source was not read — this reflects the declared tool metadata only.
Capability — what it could do if the model were manipulated
Tags derived from each tool’s schema and the implementation, not from what the tool calls itself. minimal is the level these add up to.
| Tool | Capability tags | Why the tag was assigned |
|---|---|---|
| which_laws_apply | no tags | |
| assessment_questions | no tags | |
| score_assessment | no tags | |
| transfer_check | no tags | |
| fadp_obligations | no tags | |
| action_plan | no tags | |
| document_templates | no tags | |
| fadp_questions | no tags |
Toxic-flow graph
The lethal trifecta, checked as a graph rather than as a checklist: untrusted input, a sensitive source and an external sink have to meet before there is a path worth worrying about.
The public result for this release does not print the flow graph, so there is nothing to show here. That is not the same as "no paths were found": what the scan did read is above, under coverage.
Supply chain and provenance
Integrityfirst-seen
Surface digest25ef3554048b1617
Scanned2026-10-27
This is the first scan of this surface here, so there is nothing yet to compare it against.
Every result on this tab comes from one deterministic pass over the published package — offline, rule by rule, and auditable line by line above. Same methodology version, same bytes, same score.
Release history
This is an address its publisher runs: which release it serves is theirs to choose, so there is nothing here to pin. The history below is for reading; the current release on file is 1.0.0.
1.0.0
undated
latestNo release note was published with this version.
—
no reviews yet
Who can review
One review per account, from a signed-in account that does not publish this listing. Nothing else is asked — you can say what you think before you install it. Publishers can reply once per review, and a review can be edited or deleted by whoever wrote it.
Sign in to write one
Any signed-in account that does not publish EasyLPD: Swiss data protection (FADP) and GDPR can review it, once — before installing it or after. A review from an account that has installed it is marked as one.
No reviews yet
Nobody has reviewed this listing. The rating on the card is the mean of the reviews written here and nothing else, so there is no rating until somebody writes the first — which takes a signed-in account that does not publish it, and nothing else.