Alpaca Trading API integration for Model Context Protocol (MCP)
Nothing to run from here
ETFIQ is installed from its publisher's own source and answers where it runs, so this marketplace is not in the path of a single call. There is no address here to send one to, and a panel that pretended otherwise would be showing you an answer we made up. Install it and call it from your own client — the Installation tab has the entry for each one.
13
tools declared
—
trust score
remote
at its publisher
—
calls last 7d
What it does
Independent US ETF data: holdings, fees, overlap, returns, each with its source and date.
Quickstart
# 1 — add it to Claude Code
claude mcp add --scope user --transport http etfiq-mcp https://mcp.etfiq.com
# 2 — ask your agent for something these tools do
# etf_search, etf_profile, etf_holdings and 10 more
ETFIQ costs nothing on mcprush: there is no plan to choose here, no cap to set and nothing mcprush can bill you for.
Publishernot claimed
ETAll 1 server
etfiq1 server
1 category
Collected from a public index. Nobody has claimed this account, so nothing here was written by its author — claim it if it is yours.
Installation
Where are you running it?
Every route below installs the same thing and ends at the same approval screen. Nothing here runs on your machine and nothing runs on ours: this server answers at its publisher’s own address, and what you install is the connection straight to it.
Claude Codedeclared by this listing
This is a public server: it answers at its publisher’s own address and this marketplace is not in the path. Claude Code registers it in one command; --scope user makes it available in every project. The transport below is http, as the publisher's own manifest declares it.
claude mcp add --scope user --transport http etfiq-mcp https://mcp.etfiq.comReconnect, or start a new session, and the tools appear in the model’s tool list.
Free on mcprush, and it answers at its publisher’s own address: this marketplace is not in the path, so there is no key of ours to hold and no card to add.
What it writes
One config entry pointing straight at the publisher’s own address — this marketplace is not in the path, and nothing from this listing executes on your machine.
What you approve
13 tools, with what each one reads, writes and reaches shown before you agree — the same list on every route above. Read the tool surface.
Tool surface
What the model actually sees. Descriptions are diffed on every release — see version history.
Find US listed ETFs by ticker, fund name, or a word from the name. Use this FIRST when the user names a fund loosely, then etf_profile with the ticker it returns. Refuses rather than returning a near match.
No parameter schema on file.
Everything ETFIQ publishes about one fund: issuer, desk, and each figure with its source and as-of date, plus a one sentence verdict on how it did against what its own label promises.
No parameter schema on file.
What a fund holds, by weight, and how old that is. ALWAYS read lag_days before presenting it: an issuer file read today and a filing from two months ago both come back here and are not the same answer.
No parameter schema on file.
Every US listed fund in a theme, largest first, with what each charges and how much of it is already in the S&P 500. USE THIS for any "what X ETFs are there" or "top X ETFs" question: it returns the whole published set rather than a sample.
No parameter schema on file.
Every theme ETFIQ publishes and how many funds each holds. Call when unsure what a theme is called, then etf_theme.
No parameter schema on file.
Read ANY published ETFIQ page as text: a theme hub, a ranking, a comparison of two funds, an issuer, a methodology note, a dated study. Takes a path like /themes/cyber or a full etfiq.com URL. This reaches all 40,000 pages, including everything the typed tools above do not cover, and returns the page content rather than its navigation.
No parameter schema on file.
What ETFIQ publishes, section by section, with a page count for each. Start here when the question is not about one fund: it names every section and what is in it.
No parameter schema on file.
The pages inside one section, optionally filtered to those whose address contains a word. Use after etfiq_sections to find a page, then etfiq_page to read it. The count returned is the whole matching set even when the list is capped.
No parameter schema on file.
Every fund matching some filters, largest first, each with its net assets and the source and date that figure came from. Use for "find me all X" questions rather than repeated searches. Fees are percentages, not basis points. Funds with no published size are set aside from a size filter and counted in no_size_figure rather than treated as small.
No parameter schema on file.
How much of their weight two funds hold in common, as ETFIQ published it on the comparison page for that pair. Use when asked whether two ETFs are the same thing, or whether owning both adds anything. Refuses rather than estimating when the pair is not compared or either holdings book is incomplete.
No parameter schema on file.
What ETFIQ published on a given date, from its frozen dated archive. Use when a question is about a past date, or when a figure needs to stay true after it is quoted: every other tool here answers about today and today moves overnight. Takes YYYY-MM-DD. Covers the pieces written that night, not an arbitrary per-fund figure on an arbitrary day.
No parameter schema on file.
Which US listed ETFs hold a given company, ranked by how much of each fund it is. USE THIS for any "which ETFs hold X", "which fund holds the most X", or "how do I get exposure to X" question, where X is a company rather than a fund. Takes a company name or its ticker. Returns every holder with the weight its issuer published and the date that book was filed. Covers 31,019 companies.
No parameter schema on file.
The ranked lists ETFIQ publishes, or one of them. Each ranks ONE published figure inside a stated set: the cheapest funds in a theme, the leveraged funds furthest from their stated multiple, the buffer funds closest to their cap. Call with no argument for the list.
No parameter schema on file.
Free
$0 forever
- Every tool — any call limit is its publisher’s, not ours
- No card, and mcprush charges nothing for it
- Runs at its publisher’s own address — this marketplace is not in the path
- Nothing to cap, because mcprush bills nothing
What counts against your monthly calls
| Tool | Unit | Calls used | Out of the allowance |
|---|
Nothing here is billable: mcprush charges nothing to install ETFIQ or to call it, at any volume.
Call allowance · this installenforced at the gateway
Monthly allowance, in calls
—
—
Alert at 80% · then the tool returns a normal MCP error
Used this month: —
—Grade not published
No rule-by-rule report on file for this release
Two independent axes, because powerful and malicious are different questions. The grade is threat only. The capability level is blast radius, and it is never a penalty on the grade — it is priced as one subtract-only term in the score, where you can see it.
This listing is an address its publisher runs, and you connect to it directly — this marketplace is not in the path. The scanner reads packages and public source, and an address is neither. So there is no grade — not a withheld one, an unmeasured one.
Release history
This is an address its publisher runs: which release it serves is theirs to choose, so there is nothing here to pin. The history below is for reading; the current release on file is 0.1.0.
0.1.0
undated
latestNo release note was published with this version.
—
no reviews yet
Who can review
One review per account, from a signed-in account that does not publish this listing. Nothing else is asked — you can say what you think before you install it. Publishers can reply once per review, and a review can be edited or deleted by whoever wrote it.
Sign in to write one
Any signed-in account that does not publish ETFIQ can review it, once — before installing it or after. A review from an account that has installed it is marked as one.
No reviews yet
Nobody has reviewed this listing. The rating on the card is the mean of the reviews written here and nothing else, so there is no rating until somebody writes the first — which takes a signed-in account that does not publish it, and nothing else.