Comprehensive Model Context Protocol server for managing Home Assistant through AI assistants.
Nothing to run from here
EU AI Act Explorer is installed from its publisher's own source and answers where it runs, so this marketplace is not in the path of a single call. There is no address here to send one to, and a panel that pretended otherwise would be showing you an answer we made up. Install it and call it from your own client — the Installation tab has the entry for each one.
93/100
tool-list score
9
tools declared
remote
at its publisher
—
calls last 7d
What it does
Read-only EU AI Act (Reg. 2024/1689 as amended) answers, citing official sources
Quickstart
# 1 — add it to Claude Code
claude mcp add --scope user --transport http eu-ai-act-explorer-mcp https://mcp.euaiactlaw.com/mcp
# 2 — ask your agent for something these tools do
# get_article, get_recital, get_annex and 6 more
EU AI Act Explorer costs nothing on mcprush: there is no plan to choose here, no cap to set and nothing mcprush can bill you for.
Publishernot claimed
EUAll 1 server
euaiactlaw1 server
1 category
Collected from a public index. Nobody has claimed this account, so nothing here was written by its author — claim it if it is yours.
Installation
Where are you running it?
Every route below installs the same thing and ends at the same approval screen. Nothing here runs on your machine and nothing runs on ours: this server answers at its publisher’s own address, and what you install is the connection straight to it.
Claude Codedeclared by this listing
This is a public server: it answers at its publisher’s own address and this marketplace is not in the path. Claude Code registers it in one command; --scope user makes it available in every project. The transport below is http, as the publisher's own manifest declares it.
claude mcp add --scope user --transport http eu-ai-act-explorer-mcp https://mcp.euaiactlaw.com/mcpReconnect, or start a new session, and the tools appear in the model’s tool list.
Free on mcprush, and it answers at its publisher’s own address: this marketplace is not in the path, so there is no key of ours to hold and no card to add.
What it writes
One config entry pointing straight at the publisher’s own address — this marketplace is not in the path, and nothing from this listing executes on your machine.
What you approve
9 tools, with what each one reads, writes and reaches shown before you agree — the same list on every route above. Read the tool surface.
Tool surface
What the model actually sees. Descriptions are diffed on every release — see version history.
Get the full amended text of one article of the EU AI Act, including lettered numbers such as "60a".
| Parameter | Type | Required | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| number | string | yes | Article number, e.g. "6", "25", "60a" |
Get the full text of one recital of the EU AI Act.
| Parameter | Type | Required | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| number | integer | yes | Recital number |
Get the full text of one annex of the EU AI Act (roman numeral).
| Parameter | Type | Required | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| number | string | yes | Annex number as roman numeral, e.g. "III", "XIV" |
Get the Article 3 definition of a term used in the EU AI Act.
| Parameter | Type | Required | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| term | string | yes | The defined term, e.g. "provider", "high-risk AI system" |
Full-text search over articles, recitals and annexes of the EU AI Act. Returns ranked matches with snippets.
| Parameter | Type | Required | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| query | string | yes | — |
| scope | string | no | Defaults to all |
| limit | integer | no | Max results to return (default 5, hard cap 25) |
List the obligations for a role under the EU AI Act, optionally filtered by risk tier.
| Parameter | Type | Required | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| role | string | yes | — |
| risk_tier | string | no | Filter by risk tier; "all" = no filter. Synonyms accepted. |
| limit | integer | no | Max obligations to return (default all, hard cap 25 per call) |
| offset | integer | no | Skip this many obligations (for paging) |
| fields | string | no | compact omits provision_text |
Show which EU AI Act obligations and phases are in force or pending as of a given date.
| Parameter | Type | Required | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| date | string | no | ISO date, e.g. "2027-06-01". Defaults to today. |
Report a problem or a gap in this server's data (a wrong text, a missing amendment, a broken answer). One-way: no reply is sent.
| Parameter | Type | Required | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| category | string | yes | error = something factually wrong; content_gap = correct request for missing material; other |
| message | string | yes | What is wrong or missing. Max 1,000 characters. |
| tool | string | no | Optional: which tool the feedback is about |
| client | string | no | Optional: self-declared client name |
Run the EU AI Act compliance assessment: given the entity's answers (same decision tree as the interactive checker on euaiactlaw.com), returns the applicable roles, risk classification, full obligation list with legal basis and deadlines, and notes (e.g. Annex I Section B reduced regime, open-source GPAI exception, Art 27(3) NCA notification, distributor obligations under Art 24). Pass answers key
| Parameter | Type | Required | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| E1 | array | yes | What is your role in relation to the AI system? Options: provider = Provider; deployer = Deployer; distributor = Distributor; importer = Importer; product_manufacturer = Product Manufacturer; auth_rep |
| E2 | array | no | Do you or any downstream entity make any of these modifications? Options: rename = Putting a different name or trademark on the system; repurpose = Modifying the intended purpose of a system already i |
| E3 | array | no | Does your product integrate an AI system and meet either criterion? Options: ai_with_product = AI system placed on the market together with the product under manufacturer name/trademark; ai_after_prod |
| HR1 | array | no | Does your AI system fall within any Annex I, Section B categories? Options: aviation_security = Civil aviation security; motor_type_approval = Motor vehicles type approval; machinery = Machinery; vehi |
| HR2 | array | no | Does your AI system fall within any Annex I, Section A categories? Options: toys = Toys; recreational = Recreational craft & personal watercraft; lifts = Lifts and safety components of lifts; atex = E |
| HR3 | string | no | Is your product required to undergo third-party conformity assessment under the applicable EU laws? Options: yes = Yes — third-party conformity assessment is required; no = No — manufacturer self-decl |
| HR4 | array | no | Does your AI system fall within any Annex III high-risk categories? Options: biometrics = Biometrics; critical_infra = Critical infrastructure; education = Educational and vocational training; employm |
| HR5 | string | no | Does your AI system pose a significant risk of harm to health, safety, or fundamental rights? Options: yes = Yes — poses significant risk (or system performs profiling of natural persons); no = No — m |
| HR6 | array | no | Does your product include an AI system as a "safety component" AND fall within Annex I, Section A categories? Options: toys = Toys; recreational = Recreational craft & personal watercraft; lifts = Lif |
| S1 | array | no | Do you meet any of the following criteria for EU AI Act applicability? Options: placing_eu = I am placing on the market or putting into service AI systems in the EU; gpai_eu = I am placing on the mark |
| R1 | array | no | Does your AI model meet any systemic risk criteria? (GPAI only) Options: high_flops = High impact capabilities (trained with cumulative compute >10²⁵ FLOPs); commission_decision = Commission has decid |
| R2 | array | no | Does your system or use-case fall within any exclusion category? Options: military = AI systems developed and used exclusively for military purposes; third_country_law = Public authorities / internati |
| R3 | array | no | Does your system perform any prohibited AI practices? Options: subliminal = Subliminal techniques, manipulation, or deception; vulnerable_exploit = Exploiting vulnerabilities of specific groups; biome |
| R4 | array | no | Does your system perform any transparency-triggering functions? Options: deepfake = Generating or manipulating image/audio/video constituting a deep fake; public_interest_text = Generating or manipula |
| R5 | string | no | Are you a body governed by public law, or a private entity providing public services, or operating in insurance/banking? Options: yes = Yes — public law body, public service provider, or insurance/ban |
Free
$0 forever
- Every tool — any call limit is its publisher’s, not ours
- No card, and mcprush charges nothing for it
- Runs at its publisher’s own address — this marketplace is not in the path
- Nothing to cap, because mcprush bills nothing
What counts against your monthly calls
| Tool | Unit | Calls used | Out of the allowance |
|---|
Nothing here is billable: mcprush charges nothing to install EU AI Act Explorer or to call it, at any volume.
Call allowance · this installenforced at the gateway
Monthly allowance, in calls
—
—
Alert at 80% · then the tool returns a normal MCP error
Used this month: —
ATool-list grade · score 93 / 100
Release 1.0.0 · scanned 23 Oct 2026
Graded from the tools this server lists, not from its source code.
Two independent axes, because powerful and malicious are different questions. The grade is threat only. The capability level is blast radius, and it is never a penalty on the grade — it is priced as one subtract-only term in the score, where you can see it.
Threat score100
Client score93
Findings0 threat · 0 capability
Capabilitymoderate
Coveragemanifest
Verificationnot in this report
Surface digestcb110b0f4d46763c2848e98e3f76b516f7148e263d01643e4f1d3a6a0409fb1e
Score vectorthreat 100 → client 93
| Term | Level | What it prices | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
| capability-exposure | moderate | capability blast radius (moderate) — client exposure if the model is manipulated | −3 |
| coverage-honesty | manifest | inspection depth (manifest) — how much of the target the scan could see | −4 |
score = clamp(round(threatScore − E_cap − E_ver − E_cov), 0, 100). No model, no opinion, no network call at scoring time: the same methodology version against the same bytes always produces this number, and every line above is a field of the report rather than a summary of it.
What the scan could actually read
A grade is only as meaningful as its coverage, so the scanner publishes its own depth before it publishes its result.
The scan read each tool’s name, description, input schema and annotations exactly as the server listed them the last time it answered us; no code was reviewed. We ask the server again about once a month, and a list that changed is graded again.
Tool surfaceread
Implementation sourcenot available
Package metadatanot available
Live transportnot available
The implementation source was not read — this reflects the declared tool metadata only.
Capability — what it could do if the model were manipulated
Tags derived from each tool’s schema and the implementation, not from what the tool calls itself. moderate is the level these add up to.
| Tool | Capability tags | Why the tag was assigned |
|---|---|---|
| get_article | no tags | |
| get_recital | no tags | |
| get_annex | no tags | |
| get_definition | no tags | |
| search_text | no tags | |
| get_obligations | no tags | |
| get_deadlines | no tags | |
| send_feedback | external-sink | external-sink: declares readOnlyHint: false, openWorldHint: true |
| assess_compliance | no tags |
Toxic-flow graph
The lethal trifecta, checked as a graph rather than as a checklist: untrusted input, a sensitive source and an external sink have to meet before there is a path worth worrying about.
The public result for this release does not print the flow graph, so there is nothing to show here. That is not the same as "no paths were found": what the scan did read is above, under coverage.
Supply chain and provenance
Integrityfirst-seen
Surface digestcb110b0f4d46763c
Scanned2026-10-23
This is the first scan of this surface here, so there is nothing yet to compare it against.
Every result on this tab comes from one deterministic pass over the published package — offline, rule by rule, and auditable line by line above. Same methodology version, same bytes, same score.
Release history
This is an address its publisher runs: which release it serves is theirs to choose, so there is nothing here to pin. The history below is for reading; the current release on file is 1.0.0.
1.0.0
undated
latestNo release note was published with this version.
—
no reviews yet
Who can review
One review per account, from a signed-in account that does not publish this listing. Nothing else is asked — you can say what you think before you install it. Publishers can reply once per review, and a review can be edited or deleted by whoever wrote it.
Sign in to write one
Any signed-in account that does not publish EU AI Act Explorer can review it, once — before installing it or after. A review from an account that has installed it is marked as one.
No reviews yet
Nobody has reviewed this listing. The rating on the card is the mean of the reviews written here and nothing else, so there is no rating until somebody writes the first — which takes a signed-in account that does not publish it, and nothing else.