Resolve documentation ownership, edit roots, checks, and human handoffs before an agent edits code.
Genko Prior Auth public docs is installed from its publisher's own source and answers where it runs, so this marketplace is not in the path of a single call. There is no address here to send one to, and a panel that pretended otherwise would be showing you an answer we made up. Install it and call it from your own client — the Installation tab has the entry for each one.
What it does
Read-only Genko Prior Auth docs, guides, specialty checklists, facts, pricing and fit checks.
Quickstart
# 1 — add it to Claude Code
claude mcp add --scope user --transport http genko-prior-auth-public-docs-mcp https://priorauth.getgenko.com/mcp
# 2 — ask your agent for something these tools do
# search_docs, get_page, get_packet_checklist and 3 more
Genko Prior Auth public docs costs nothing on mcprush: there is no plan to choose here, no cap to set and nothing mcprush can bill you for.
Collected from a public index. Nobody has claimed this account, so nothing here was written by its author — claim it if it is yours.
Where are you running it?
Every route below installs the same thing and ends at the same approval screen. Nothing here runs on your machine and nothing runs on ours: this server answers at its publisher’s own address, and what you install is the connection straight to it.
This is a public server: it answers at its publisher’s own address and this marketplace is not in the path. Claude Code registers it in one command; --scope user makes it available in every project. The transport below is http, as the publisher's own manifest declares it.
claude mcp add --scope user --transport http genko-prior-auth-public-docs-mcp https://priorauth.getgenko.com/mcpReconnect, or start a new session, and the tools appear in the model’s tool list.
One config entry pointing straight at the publisher’s own address — this marketplace is not in the path, and nothing from this listing executes on your machine.
6 tools, with what each one reads, writes and reaches shown before you agree — the same list on every route above. Read the tool surface.
Tool surface
What the model actually sees. Descriptions are diffed on every release — see version history.
Search Genko Prior Auth's public site: docs, prior authorization guides, specialty pages (dental, aesthetics, physiotherapy), pricing, facts and agent information. Returns up to 10 ranked pages with URL and snippet; read one in full with get_page. Public content only, no practice or patient data.
| Parameter | Type | Required | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| query | string | yes | What to look for, in plain words, e.g. 'appeal a denied physiotherapy request', 'dental crown', 'how much does it cost'. |
| limit | integer | no | Most results to return (1-10, default 5). |
Read one public Genko Prior Auth page as Markdown (the same text as its .md version), by path or URL, e.g. '/pricing', '/facts', '/docs/faq'. Public pages only; the signed-in app is never available.
| Parameter | Type | Required | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| path | string | yes | Public page path, e.g. '/', '/docs/faq', '/guides/what-is-prior-authorization', '/specialties/dental', '/pricing'. A '.md' suffix or a full URL on this site also works. |
What Genko Prior Auth collects for a prior authorization request in a specialty (dental, aesthetics, physiotherapy, or the generic form): request details, structured-findings fields and choices, and code systems. Useful for 'what goes in a packet'. No patient data, no code descriptors.
| Parameter | Type | Required | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| specialty | string | yes | Practice type. 'generic' is the form every other practice type uses. |
Checked facts about Genko Prior Auth: what it is and isn't, who it's for, stage, specialties, how payers are handled, security, limits, pricing and what exists for agents. Same source as /facts and /facts.json. Quote these instead of guessing.
No parameter schema on file.
Current Genko Prior Auth plans in US dollars per practice per month, with each plan's monthly draft and AI-token limits and the free trial's terms. Use this to answer 'how much does it cost'; never estimate prices.
No parameter schema on file.
Say whether Genko Prior Auth supports a practice's specialty (own form, general form, or not supported) and what it offers there, from what the product implements. A payer can be given, but the product does not evaluate payers or payer rules, and the answer says so.
| Parameter | Type | Required | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| specialty | string | yes | The practice's specialty in plain words, e.g. 'dental', 'physical therapy', 'aesthetics', 'optometry'. |
| payer | string | no | Optional payer name. The product does not evaluate payers; the answer says so. |
- Every tool — any call limit is its publisher’s, not ours
- No card, and mcprush charges nothing for it
- Runs at its publisher’s own address — this marketplace is not in the path
- Nothing to cap, because mcprush bills nothing
What counts against your monthly calls
| Tool | Unit | Calls used | Out of the allowance |
|---|
Nothing here is billable: mcprush charges nothing to install Genko Prior Auth public docs or to call it, at any volume.
Two independent axes, because powerful and malicious are different questions. The grade is threat only. The capability level is blast radius, and it is never a penalty on the grade — it is priced as one subtract-only term in the score, where you can see it.
| Term | Level | What it prices | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
| capability-exposure | minimal | capability blast radius (minimal) — client exposure if the model is manipulated | −0 |
| coverage-honesty | manifest | inspection depth (manifest) — how much of the target the scan could see | −4 |
What the scan could actually read
A grade is only as meaningful as its coverage, so the scanner publishes its own depth before it publishes its result.
The scan read each tool’s name, description, input schema and annotations exactly as the server listed them the last time it answered us; no code was reviewed. We ask the server again about once a month, and a list that changed is graded again.
The implementation source was not read — this reflects the declared tool metadata only.
Capability — what it could do if the model were manipulated
Tags derived from each tool’s schema and the implementation, not from what the tool calls itself. minimal is the level these add up to.
| Tool | Capability tags | Why the tag was assigned |
|---|---|---|
| search_docs | no tags | |
| get_page | untrusted-input | untrusted-input: keyword "get_page" |
| get_packet_checklist | no tags | |
| get_product_facts | no tags | |
| get_pricing | no tags | |
| check_fit | no tags |
Toxic-flow graph
The lethal trifecta, checked as a graph rather than as a checklist: untrusted input, a sensitive source and an external sink have to meet before there is a path worth worrying about.
The public result for this release does not print the flow graph, so there is nothing to show here. That is not the same as "no paths were found": what the scan did read is above, under coverage.
Supply chain and provenance
This is the first scan of this surface here, so there is nothing yet to compare it against.
Every result on this tab comes from one deterministic pass over the published package — offline, rule by rule, and auditable line by line above. Same methodology version, same bytes, same score.
Release history
This is an address its publisher runs: which release it serves is theirs to choose, so there is nothing here to pin. The history below is for reading; the current release on file is 1.1.0.
No release note was published with this version.
One review per account, from a signed-in account that does not publish this listing. Nothing else is asked — you can say what you think before you install it. Publishers can reply once per review, and a review can be edited or deleted by whoever wrote it.
Any signed-in account that does not publish Genko Prior Auth public docs can review it, once — before installing it or after. A review from an account that has installed it is marked as one.
Nobody has reviewed this listing. The rating on the card is the mean of the reviews written here and nothing else, so there is no rating until somebody writes the first — which takes a signed-in account that does not publish it, and nothing else.