Malawi law database -- legislation from malawilii.org with full-text search, definitions, and EU cross-references
from $10/mo
Tools
analyze_prosecution_history
Analyze the full prosecution history of a trademark — narrative timeline of office actions, responses, examiner decisions, and current status, with examiner-behavior patterns. For authenticated users this launches asynchronously (usually done in under a minute; longer for large file histories) and returns a processing handle — then call get_prosecution_history_status to fetch the completed result.
ArgumentsA call is made on an account: it counts against an allowance and the publisher sees it, which is why this one asks who you are first.
—
p95 latency
—
call success
—
uptime 90d
0
calls last 7d
What it does
Search 13.7M+ USPTO trademarks. Clearance, phonetic matching, TTAB stats, analytics.
Quickstart
# 1 — install (mcprush login holds a key from your dashboard)
npx mcprush@latest add gleanmark-trademark-search-mcp
# 2 — ask your agent something
> Search 13.7M+ USPTO trademarks. Clearance, phonetic matching, TTAB stats, analytics.
GleanMark Trademark Search is free: there is no plan to choose, no cap to set and nothing that can bill you.
Publishernot claimed
GLAll 1 server
gleanmark.com1 server
1 category
Collected from a public index. Nobody has claimed this account, so nothing here was written by its author — claim it if it is yours.
Installation
Where are you running it?
Every route below installs the same thing and ends at the same approval screen. Nothing here runs on your machine — this server runs on the publisher’s own infrastructure behind our gateway, and what you install is the connection to it.
Claude Codedeclared by this listing
This is a public server: you run it yourself and this marketplace is not in the path. Claude Code registers it in one command.
claude mcp add --transport http gleanmark-trademark-search-mcp https://gleanmark.com/mcpReconnect, or start a new session, and the tools appear in the model’s tool list.
Free to install, and it runs from its publisher’s own package: no account, no key, no card.
What it writes
One config entry pointing at the gateway. The server itself runs on the publisher’s own infrastructure, so nothing from this listing executes on your machine.
What you approve
61 tools, with what each one reads, writes and reaches shown before you agree — the same list on every route above. Read the tool surface.
Tool surface
What the model actually sees. Descriptions are diffed on every release — see version history.
Analyze the full prosecution history of a trademark — narrative timeline of office actions, responses, examiner decisions, and current status, with examiner-behavior patterns. For authenticated users this launches asynchronously (usually done in under a minute; longer for large file histories) and returns a processing handle — then call get_prosecution_history_status to fetch the completed result.
Takes no parameters.
Example callreturns →
Analyze a TTAB (Trademark Trial and Appeal Board) proceeding in depth — fetches and analyzes proceeding documents, identifies key arguments, and returns a structured summary with timeline, party positions, and strategic assessment. For authenticated full-mode runs this launches asynchronously (typically 1-2 minutes) and returns a processing handle — then call get_ttab_proceeding_analysis_status to
Takes no parameters.
Example callreturns →
Quick brand availability check — combines domain availability with a trademark conflict signal. Returns a recommendation tier (avoid, probably avoid, promising, or no conflicts found). Good first step before a full clearance search.
Takes no parameters.
Example callreturns →
Check domain availability for a brand name. Returns status (available, parked, commercially used, or taken) for each TLD, plus .com variations (e.g., getbrand.com, brandhq.com).
Takes no parameters.
Example callreturns →
Compare two trademarks for likelihood of confusion using DuPont-style analysis. Returns similarity scores and risk assessment.
Takes no parameters.
Example callreturns →
Count and preview USPTO marks by record attributes rather than owner identity, with mark-type, standard-character, and Nice-class breakdowns plus metadata coverage. Use this for drawing type, standard-character, Nice-class, status, and cross-attribute counts. It can intersect claimed-color criteria with those attributes; color-only counts, rankings, lists, and vocabulary are outside its scope.
Takes no parameters.
Example callreturns →
Look up coordinated Nice classes or related Nice classes for a given class number.
Takes no parameters.
Example callreturns →
Aggregate event-to-event pendency across a COHORT of marks — e.g. "average days from office action to publication for marks published in Q2 2026". Pick the cohort by an anchor event (preset: publication, notice_of_publication, registration, notice_of_allowance, abandonment, first_office_action — or raw event codes, trailing * = prefix) within a date window (max 366 days), and an interval start/end
Takes no parameters.
Example callreturns →
Get all trademarks handled by a specific attorney/correspondent, with prosecution event counts and office action flags. Returns marks sorted by prosecution history length. Use this for attorney-specific mark queries.
Takes no parameters.
Example callreturns →
Summarize what a named correspondent specializes in, including top clients, top Nice classes, and prosecution-versus-TTAB profile. Use this when the user asks what a specific correspondent or attorney specializes in.
Takes no parameters.
Example callreturns →
Check what role a USPTO event code plays for a deadline type (satisfies it, triggers it, abandons it, suspends it) per the deadline vocabulary table deadline_event_roles — office action response, opposition period, Statement of Use, Section 8/9/15, post-registration office action, ITU notice.
Takes no parameters.
Example callreturns →
Look up USPTO event codes used in trademark prosecution. Search by exact code, code prefix, or keyword in the event description. Returns the code, human-readable description, and category.
Takes no parameters.
Example callreturns →
Look up which USPTO status code and status definition most commonly follow a specific prosecution event code.
Takes no parameters.
Example callreturns →
Get the full fame profile for a brand (by mark wording or brand stem): fame tier (broad/dilution-tier vs market-specific), the fame "path" it cleared (concentrated dominant family vs large multi-class portfolio), its famous class footprint, corporate-family portfolio size and class breadth, brand-stem crowding, and TTAB enforcement history. Use to explain WHY a mark is (or is not) famous, or to pr
Takes no parameters.
Example callreturns →
Resolve a trademark law firm and return what its lawyers should focus on: overdue/next-window action-required deadlines plus recent Office Actions from both case-file events and prosecution documents, including ROA-filed and §2(d) indicators. Use this for questions like "what correspondent tasks should this firm focus on over the next 30 days?" or "what recent OAs does this law firm have?".
Takes no parameters.
Example callreturns →
Get public, system-generated trademark deadlines across marks handled by a specific law firm. Uses public firm resolution and prosecution mappings only. Does not expose any workspace, client, reminder, or user-created deadline data.
Takes no parameters.
Example callreturns →
Resolve a trademark law firm and compute mark-level Office Action outcome rates: how many firm-handled marks registered after receiving an OA, raw and excluding pending matters. Use this for questions like "what percentage registered after an OA?" or "OA success rate for this firm".
Takes no parameters.
Example callreturns →
Get the leading correspondents or attorneys inside one named law firm, ranked by filing volume with prosecution and TTAB activity counts. Use this when the user asks for top correspondents at a specific firm, such as "Who are the top correspondents at Fross Zelnick?"
Takes no parameters.
Example callreturns →
Get the latest office action for a trademark serial number, plus the latest recorded response if one exists, and the VERIFIED refusal grounds (with cited registration numbers) parsed from the OA text. Use refusal_grounds as the authoritative answer to "what is this OA about / what ground is the refusal" — never infer the basis from the document title or general knowledge.
Takes no parameters.
Example callreturns →
Get an AI-generated deep-dive summary of a specific trademark. Covers mark details, goods/services, status, owner, prosecution context, and any active legal proceedings.
Takes no parameters.
Example callreturns →
Get public, system-generated trademark deadlines for a specific mark. Accepts a serial number directly or resolves a mark name to a specific serial first. Does not expose any workspace, client, reminder, or user-created deadline data.
Takes no parameters.
Example callreturns →
Get the international / foreign footprint of a U.S. trademark by serial number: its Madrid Protocol international registration (IR number, date, status, renewal), whether it was filed as a 66(a) Madrid extension, Madrid maintenance (§8/§15, renewal), and the foreign applications/registrations it claims as priority or basis (country, registration number, dates). Use this for ANY question about a ma
Takes no parameters.
Example callreturns →
Show which owners hold marks matching a shared trademark term and summarize what else those owners have in their broader portfolios. Use this for crowded owner-landscape questions like "Which companies own a trademark for COMET?" or "Who owns trademarks for GLEAN?" Returns the matching owners ranked by footprint, with each owner's wider portfolio context.
Takes no parameters.
Example callreturns →
Get a compact prosecution summary for a trademark serial number. Returns current status, document counts, latest office action/response dates, milestones, and the latest key event.
Takes no parameters.
Example callreturns →
Get information about Nice Classification classes used for trademark registration. Lookup specific class numbers or search for classes by keyword.
Takes no parameters.
Example callreturns →
Get an AI-generated strategic analysis of a trademark owner. Covers brand protection philosophy, litigation posture, portfolio evolution, class distribution, and likely future behavior. Results are cached for 30 days.
Takes no parameters.
Example callreturns →
Get public, system-generated trademark deadlines across a specific owner’s marks. Uses public USPTO owner resolution only. Does not expose any workspace, client, reminder, or user-created deadline data.
Takes no parameters.
Example callreturns →
Get a trademark owner's filing trends over time — yearly filing counts broken down by Nice class. Shows how the owner's trademark portfolio has evolved.
Takes no parameters.
Example callreturns →
Get the most frequent goods/services keywords for a trademark owner. Shows what products and services the owner focuses on, useful for understanding their brand strategy and identifying class patterns.
Takes no parameters.
Example callreturns →
Find entities likely related to a trademark owner (predecessors, subsidiaries, sister companies) from USPTO evidence: shared ownership history on the same marks, shared filing addresses (agent addresses excluded), and shared distinctive name tokens. Returns evidence and a high/possible confidence tier per hit — treat 'possible' as tentative. Use when analyzing an owner's full corporate family, por
Takes no parameters.
Example callreturns →
Analyze one trademark owner's TTAB enforcement in a single call. Filters and counts only target marks that actually satisfy the requested class, mark-type, and claimed-color criteria; separately reports all targets attached to qualifying proceedings. Supports exact class-only questions with target_class_match=only. Claimed-color metadata identifies candidate marks but does not prove color was alle
Takes no parameters.
Example callreturns →
Get a compact TTAB history for one owner with substantive inter partes, opposition, cancellation, extension, appeal, and role breakdowns. Do not equate total records with initiated oppositions. Use get_owner_ttab_enforcement for date ranges or challenged-mark/class analysis.
Takes no parameters.
Example callreturns →
Retrieve one specific USPTO prosecution document by the stable document_id returned from list_prosecution_documents, USPTO document id, code, or date. Returns the working USPTO document link, extraction/readability status, cached document text, and optional query-centered excerpts. Use text_query when the user asks what the document says about a particular issue.
Takes no parameters.
Example callreturns →
Get the prosecution timeline for a trademark — chronological list of office actions, responses, and key events (publication, registration, suspension, etc.). Raw data without AI analysis.
Takes no parameters.
Example callreturns →
Look up USPTO or TTAB reference codes and small lookup tables such as status codes, statement types, legal entity types, Nice classes, design codes, and TTAB proceeding/status/role codes.
Takes no parameters.
Example callreturns →
Find USPTO trademarks similar to a given mark name. Uses examiner-style knockout search with phonetic, trigram, and component matching to identify potential conflicts. Returns similarity_score (mark-only similarity) and confusion_score (blended mark + commercial overlap). Useful for trademark clearance searches.
Takes no parameters.
Example callreturns →
Get a ranked filer table for a date range, filer type, and optional Nice classes. Use this when the user asks for top filers, top owners, top law firms, or top correspondents by class or date, such as "Who are the top 10 filers in Class 9 in 2025?" Returns the ranked rows with per-filer live, registered, and pending counts plus corpus totals.
Takes no parameters.
Example callreturns →
Get aggregate statistics about USPTO trademark filings, registrations, and TTAB proceedings.
Takes no parameters.
Example callreturns →
Retrieve and read one specific TTABVUE filing by proceeding number and entry number. Returns filing metadata, a working USPTO TTABVUE viewer link, direct PDF link when available, extraction/readability status, document text, and optional query-centered excerpts. Use get_ttab_proceeding_details first when the entry number is unknown.
Takes no parameters.
Example callreturns →
Get raw details for a TTAB proceeding — parties, involved marks, counsel, and recent filings with entry numbers and working TTABVUE document links. Use get_ttab_document to read one selected filing. Use get_owner_ttab_enforcement for owner-wide distributions and analyze_ttab_proceeding for AI-powered merits analysis.
Takes no parameters.
Example callreturns →
Check whether a trademark is FAMOUS — and, critically, famous FOR A SPECIFIC MARKET (you pass the applicant's Nice class as a PROXY for that market; fame is market-determined, there is no per-class fame doctrine). Fame is market-specific (Joseph Phelps Vineyards v. Fairmont): a mark famous for electronics is not automatically famous for fresh fruit. Returns is_famous, famous_in_class, the fame tie
Takes no parameters.
Example callreturns →
List prosecution documents for a trademark serial number, including stable document identifiers, working USPTO links when available, extraction/readability status, office actions, responses, notices, and other dated filings. Use get_prosecution_document to read one selected document.
Takes no parameters.
Example callreturns →
Get detailed information about a specific USPTO trademark by its serial number. Returns owner, status, filing dates, goods/services, correspondent (attorney/law firm of record — use this for "which firm represents/is correspondent for" questions), and more.
Takes no parameters.
Example callreturns →
Find trademarks whose WHOLE mark sounds similar to the given mark (Metaphone + trigram, whole-mark similarity threshold). LIMITS: it compares entire marks, so multi-word marks that merely CONTAIN a sound-alike word are invisible to it — "KWIK REWARDS" will NOT surface for a QUICK query even though KWIK sounds like QUICK. Thin or empty results are NEVER evidence that no sound-alike marks exist and
Takes no parameters.
Example callreturns →
Recommend Nice trademark classes based on a business description. Returns the most relevant classes with confidence scores and explanations.
Takes no parameters.
Example callreturns →
Research the Office Action for a trademark — returns structured refusal categories, latest OA/response context, cited marks, and third-party registrations that support coexistence arguments. For authenticated users this launches asynchronously (typically 1-2 minutes) and returns a processing handle — then call get_office_action_research_status to fetch the completed result. Tell the user it is run
Takes no parameters.
Example callreturns →
Resolve an owner, law firm, correspondent, mark, TTAB proceeding, client, or portfolio to the best trademark entity match. Resolving clients and portfolios requires authentication.
Takes no parameters.
Example callreturns →
Run a full 13-factor DuPont likelihood of confusion analysis between two trademarks. Includes web research on the companies, market overlap analysis, and detailed factor-by-factor scoring. This is the most thorough confusion analysis available — use compare_marks for a quick check first.
Takes no parameters.
Example callreturns →
Run an examiner-style knockout search with scoring via the unified knockout engine — the same engine the GleanMark product uses. This is a PURE USPTO conflict search over 14M trademark records (exact, phonetic, trigram, component words, coordinated class expansion, doctrine of foreign equivalents, design codes) with mark-similarity and commercial-overlap scoring. Returns 4-tier risk-grouped result
Takes no parameters.
Example callreturns →
Run a constrained business-level analytics query without exposing schema details. This is the default fallback for bespoke rankings, counts, snapshots, and timelines across owners, firms, and correspondents. Prefer this before chaining search, summary, or web research tools for aggregate business questions.
Takes no parameters.
Example callreturns →
Search for trademark attorneys or law firms. Returns prosecution statistics, TTAB proceeding counts (as plaintiff/defendant), and contact information.
Takes no parameters.
Example callreturns →
Search for trademark owners by name. Use this to resolve or list candidate owners, not for owner counts, rankings, prosecution snapshots, or recent activity checks. Returns matching companies/individuals with their trademark portfolio statistics (total marks, live/dead counts, registered/pending).
Takes no parameters.
Example callreturns →
Search or count US trademarks by the colours they claim, parsed from USPTO colour-claim statements. Neither TESS nor its successor offers this. TWO levels: level="family" (16 families; searching "red" also finds dark red, maroon, burgundy) and level="shade" (the exact term as claimed, e.g. "dark red"). Use match="all" for "claims at least these colours", match="only" for "claims exactly these and
Takes no parameters.
Example callreturns →
Find US trademarks by USPTO design code — the codes examiners assign to the visual elements of a logo (26.17.01 = straight bands, 24.11 = crowns). Accepts dotted (26.17.01) or packed (261701) form. USPTO design vocabulary is literal and narrow: it records "Bands, straight" where a person says "stripe", and has no entry for words like "swoosh", so a plain shape word resolves to a code through mode=
Takes no parameters.
Example callreturns →
Full-text search over the goods/services recitations of 14M USPTO marks — answers "who else claims X in their goods?" (competitive landscape, descriptiveness/crowded-field evidence, ID-drafting precedent). Keyword-based: the text is tokenized and matched against each mark's indexed goods keywords (match_mode all = every keyword must appear, any = at least one). Rows return a short excerpt around t
Takes no parameters.
Example callreturns →
Search the statements USPTO records on a trademark: disclaimer ("no claim is made to PIZZA apart from the mark"), description (the examiner's written description of the drawing — "the mark consists of a red and white striped awning"), translation (foreign wording), prior_marks (claimed ownership of earlier registrations). Answers "which marks disclaim PIZZA" and "which marks are described as strip
Takes no parameters.
Example callreturns →
Search the USPTO trademark database by name — a RANKED similarity/prefix search that returns the closest whole-mark matches (14M records). It is NOT an exhaustive contains-scan: multi-word marks that merely contain the queried word rank low and are usually cut (a KWIK query will miss KWIK REWARDS / KWIK KOPY). To enumerate ALL live marks containing a word — including compounds and respelled forms
Takes no parameters.
Example callreturns →
Search TTAB proceedings using the same discovery index as the GleanMark TTAB workspace. Use for broad proceeding discovery by party name, exact 8-digit proceeding number, 8-digit trademark serial number, or 7-digit registration number. Supports status, proceeding type, matched party role, and owner-name filters. For one known case after discovery, use get_ttab_proceeding_details; for owner enforce
Takes no parameters.
Example callreturns →
Search the USPTO Trademark ID Manual (pre-approved, surcharge-free goods & services identifications) by plain words. Call once per distinct product/service line (e.g. construction services and lighting products are two separate calls), not once per whole business. Returns selectable Term IDs; entries with {curly-brace} placeholders are fill-in templates.
Takes no parameters.
Example callreturns →
Check a draft goods & services description against the USPTO ID Manual, clause by clause (clauses split on ";"). Each clause comes back verbatim (selectable pre-approved entry), close (with up to 3 pre-approved substitutes), or freeform (subject to the USPTO $200/class free-form surcharge). Deterministic — no AI rewriting.
Takes no parameters.
Example callreturns →
Research a company, trademark, or legal topic on the internet. Returns grounded results with source citations. Use for company background, recent news, common law trademark use, or case law research.
Takes no parameters.
Example callreturns →
Freeyour plan
$0 forever
- Every tool, no call limit
- No card, no account needed
- Source published under a licence you can read
- Runs on your machine — nothing of it reaches our gateway
- Nothing to cap, because nothing bills
What counts against your monthly calls
| Tool | Unit | Calls used | Out of the allowance |
|---|
Nothing here is billable. GleanMark Trademark Search costs nothing to install and nothing to call, at any volume.
Call allowance · this installenforced at the gateway
Monthly allowance, in calls
—
—
Alert at 80% · then the tool returns a normal MCP error
Used this month: $8.42
$16.58 left
—Grade not published
No rule-by-rule report on file for this release
Two independent axes, because powerful and malicious are different questions. The grade is threat only. The capability level is blast radius, and it is never a penalty on the grade — it is priced as one subtract-only term in the score, where you can see it.
This listing is a hosted endpoint: the publisher runs it and we connect to it. The scanner reads packages and source, and neither exists to read here, so there is no grade — not a withheld one, an unmeasured one. What can be checked instead is on Installation: what it asks to reach and what it writes.
Release history
Pinned to 1.2.0 — the install command below asks for that release. A pin is part of an install, so it is kept for this visit and written down when you install.
1.2.0
undated
installedNo release note was published with this version.
—
no reviews yet
Reviews are earned
Only accounts with at least 50 real tool calls against this server in the last 90 days can post. Ratings are weighted by how much the reviewer actually uses it, and publishers can reply once per review.
Reviews are earned
Writing one takes an account with at least 50 real tool calls against GleanMark Trademark Search in the last 90 days. That is the whole gate — there is no other way to post, which is why the counts beside each review are worth reading.
No reviews yet
Nobody has reviewed this listing. The rating on the card is the mean of the reviews written here and nothing else, so there is no rating until somebody writes the first — which takes an account with 50 real tool calls against it.