Comprehensive Model Context Protocol server for managing Home Assistant through AI assistants.
Nothing to run from here
JYOTINT Sealed Forecasts is installed from its publisher's own source and answers where it runs, so this marketplace is not in the path of a single call. There is no address here to send one to, and a panel that pretended otherwise would be showing you an answer we made up. Install it and call it from your own client — the Installation tab has the entry for each one.
96/100
tool-list score
13
tools declared
remote
at its publisher
—
calls last 7d
What it does
Bitcoin-anchored sealed-forecast record: search, grades, calibration, luck test. Read-only, no key.
Quickstart
# 1 — add it to Claude Code
claude mcp add --scope user --transport http jyotint-sealed-forecasts-mcp https://jyotishintelligence.com/mcp
# 2 — ask your agent for something these tools do
# search_sealed_forecasts, get_advisory, list_open_calls and 10 more
JYOTINT Sealed Forecasts costs nothing on mcprush: there is no plan to choose here, no cap to set and nothing mcprush can bill you for.
Publishernot claimed
JYAll 1 server
jyotishintelligence1 server
1 category
Collected from a public index. Nobody has claimed this account, so nothing here was written by its author — claim it if it is yours.
Installation
Where are you running it?
Every route below installs the same thing and ends at the same approval screen. Nothing here runs on your machine and nothing runs on ours: this server answers at its publisher’s own address, and what you install is the connection straight to it.
Claude Codedeclared by this listing
This is a public server: it answers at its publisher’s own address and this marketplace is not in the path. Claude Code registers it in one command; --scope user makes it available in every project. The transport below is http, as the publisher's own manifest declares it.
claude mcp add --scope user --transport http jyotint-sealed-forecasts-mcp https://jyotishintelligence.com/mcpReconnect, or start a new session, and the tools appear in the model’s tool list.
Free on mcprush, and it answers at its publisher’s own address: this marketplace is not in the path, so there is no key of ours to hold and no card to add.
What it writes
One config entry pointing straight at the publisher’s own address — this marketplace is not in the path, and nothing from this listing executes on your machine.
What you approve
13 tools, with what each one reads, writes and reaches shown before you agree — the same list on every route above. Read the tool surface.
Tool surface
What the model actually sees. Descriptions are diffed on every release — see version history.
Search the JYOTINT sealed-forecast corpus (Bitcoin-anchored, dated-before-the-event predictions) by free text across id, title, and the verbatim sealed claim. Returns matching records with their grade, sealed probability, seal date, source artifact, and SHA-256 seal hash. For fuzzy or conceptual queries, use neural_search (finds calls by MEANING; REST twin GET /brain?q=…).
| Parameter | Type | Required | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| query | string | yes | Free-text query (e.g. 'Crocus', 'NISAR', 'Brazil election', 'recession'). |
| graded_only | boolean | no | Restrict to graded (Brier) records. Default false. |
| limit | number | no | Max results (default 10). |
| sensitivity | string | no | Recall/precision posture (default balanced). high_recall: miss nothing, accept noise — a planner inside a live window. high_precision: only hits that clear the similarity floor, the rest reported unde |
Fetch one sealed forecast by its id (e.g. 'IA-RU-008', 'LA-011', 'IA-MKT-002'). Returns the full record incl. verbatim claim, grade, outcome, sources, and seal hash.
| Parameter | Type | Required | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| id | string | yes | Advisory id. |
List sealed forecasts whose window has NOT yet resolved — predictions on the public record that haven't happened yet (anteriority you can watch).
No parameter schema on file.
Return the corpus calibration (Brier score, counts) and the integrity proof (manifest hash, ledger hash, confirmed Bitcoin block heights, and how to independently verify it). ALSO returns record_versions: the record is append-only, so if a publication cited a count/Brier that no longer matches the live count, that is expected (calls were sealed since) — resolve the paper's exact cited state by rec
No parameter schema on file.
Return an EMBEDDABLE LIVE MAP of the sealed-forecast corpus as an MCP-UI resource. Clients that can render UI resources (mcp-ui) should display it inline — it is the actual interactive JYOTINT theater map (sealed forecasts plotted by region; each pin carries its verbatim claim, grade, sealed probability, and a click-through to the full sealed record so the user can verify and score it themselves).
No parameter schema on file.
Ask any question about JYOTINT / Vijay Jyotish and get back the most relevant VERBATIM passages of the operator's own published site copy — never generated, never paraphrased, so it cannot hallucinate. This is the operator answering in his own words, drawn only from the public record (method, doctrine, the five pillars, mission-assurance fit, objections, pricing, heritage, etc.). Prefer this for a
| Parameter | Type | Required | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| query | string | yes | The question, in natural language. |
| limit | number | no | Max passages (default 3, max 6). |
| sensitivity | string | no | Recall/precision posture (default balanced). high_recall: miss nothing, accept noise — a planner inside a live window. high_precision: only hits that clear the similarity floor, the rest reported unde |
SEMANTIC + ASSOCIATIVE search over the public sealed record and the published site corpus — the JYOTINT public brain (a neural associative memory: frozen deep encoder → Hopfield pattern completion → spreading activation over typed synapses → k-winners-take-all). Finds calls by MEANING, not keywords ('upper-stage anomalies' finds the calls that describe one without those words) and returns the RELA
| Parameter | Type | Required | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| query | string | yes | Natural-language query (e.g. 'what did the record say before the Crocus attack', 'upper stage anomaly calls'). |
| k | number | no | Max results, 1–12 (default 6). |
| sensitivity | string | no | Recall/precision posture (default balanced). high_recall: miss nothing, accept noise — a planner inside a live window. high_precision: only hits that clear the similarity floor, the rest reported unde |
Information Yield (IY) — how much a confirmed call should move a skeptic's belief, in BITS of surprise-if-true (log2 of the published 1-in-N prior, capped at 1-in-a-million; earned = surprise × verdict-credit). A base rate / consensus-follower scores ZERO bits by construction — the metric on which the 'a base rate ties the Brier' objection inverts. Returns the corpus summary (LIVE median bits/call
| Parameter | Type | Required | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| id | string | no | Optional advisory id (e.g. 'LA-022') for one call's IY. |
The 'before-the-event' indications-and-warning / after-action timeline for a named event, by advisory id (e.g. 'LA-022') or slug (e.g. 'new-glenn-ng3', 'crocus'). A neutral chronology: the official/authoritative source named FIRST, then the dated, hash-anchored JYOTINT sealed call as one independently-verifiable entry, with what it does and does not establish. Use for 'what dated public warnings p
| Parameter | Type | Required | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| id | string | no | Advisory id or timeline slug. Omit to list all. |
The grade-it-yourself kit: inputs to recompute the record's Brier (calibration), named-mechanism specificity, AND Information Yield under YOUR OWN verdicts — plus the one-step stress-test recipes (harsh-verdicts, externally-adjudicated-only, estimative-worst-case, …). Each call carries its verbatim claim/outcome, the operator's p + verdict to override, and the surprise_bits / 1-in-N inputs. A base
| Parameter | Type | Required | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| id | string | no | Optional advisory id for one call's regrade row. |
The corpus-level 'could this record be luck?' significance test, computed AGAINST the record: EVERY graded call clustered into independent events (correlated calls share one event; live counts ship in the response), strict scoring (one NEAR fails the whole event), luck-prior floored at a coin flip per event. Returns the exact binomial tail, the BREAK-EVEN floor (what a skeptic must grant per event
No parameter schema on file.
The deep-pass signature findings over the FULL corpus (graded + ungraded + excluded), cross-checked against the ledger at build time: the MECHANISM LEDGER (the failure class named at seal vs the realized anomaly, all 23 launch calls, GO calls included — the direction varies with the day), the WAR READ (the Russia-Ukraine corpus as one 8-chapter campaign read, PARTIALs owned in-line), the entity-le
No parameter schema on file.
Return JYOTINT's data-handling, PROVENANCE & governance posture — the answer to 'is this source safe to read / cite / ingest?'. Chain-of-custody is foregrounded: every record is SHA-256-sealed + Bitcoin-anchored before the event and independently recomputable (the provenance the proposed GSA AI data-safeguarding rule treats as first-class). Confirms JYOTINT is a US data source (Arizona LLC), inges
No parameter schema on file.
Free
$0 forever
- Every tool — any call limit is its publisher’s, not ours
- No card, and mcprush charges nothing for it
- Runs at its publisher’s own address — this marketplace is not in the path
- Nothing to cap, because mcprush bills nothing
What counts against your monthly calls
| Tool | Unit | Calls used | Out of the allowance |
|---|
Nothing here is billable: mcprush charges nothing to install JYOTINT Sealed Forecasts or to call it, at any volume.
Call allowance · this installenforced at the gateway
Monthly allowance, in calls
—
—
Alert at 80% · then the tool returns a normal MCP error
Used this month: —
ATool-list grade · score 96 / 100
Release 1.1.0 · scanned 20 Oct 2026
Graded from the tools this server lists, not from its source code.
Two independent axes, because powerful and malicious are different questions. The grade is threat only. The capability level is blast radius, and it is never a penalty on the grade — it is priced as one subtract-only term in the score, where you can see it.
Threat score100
Client score96
Findings0 threat · 0 capability
Capabilityminimal
Coveragemanifest
Verificationnot in this report
Surface digest5d4ca405631e4fcba18e029b9d1c29e757c49b89c821237b8271e3553ce309a0
Score vectorthreat 100 → client 96
| Term | Level | What it prices | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
| capability-exposure | minimal | capability blast radius (minimal) — client exposure if the model is manipulated | −0 |
| coverage-honesty | manifest | inspection depth (manifest) — how much of the target the scan could see | −4 |
score = clamp(round(threatScore − E_cap − E_ver − E_cov), 0, 100). No model, no opinion, no network call at scoring time: the same methodology version against the same bytes always produces this number, and every line above is a field of the report rather than a summary of it.
What the scan could actually read
A grade is only as meaningful as its coverage, so the scanner publishes its own depth before it publishes its result.
The scan read each tool’s name, description, input schema and annotations exactly as the server listed them the last time it answered us; no code was reviewed. We ask the server again about once a month, and a list that changed is graded again.
Tool surfaceread
Implementation sourcenot available
Package metadatanot available
Live transportnot available
The implementation source was not read — this reflects the declared tool metadata only.
Capability — what it could do if the model were manipulated
Tags derived from each tool’s schema and the implementation, not from what the tool calls itself. minimal is the level these add up to.
| Tool | Capability tags | Why the tag was assigned |
|---|---|---|
| search_sealed_forecasts | no tags | |
| get_advisory | untrusted-input | untrusted-input: keyword "fetch" |
| list_open_calls | no tags | |
| get_calibration_and_integrity | no tags | |
| get_map | no tags | |
| ask_the_record | no tags | |
| neural_search | no tags | |
| get_information_yield | no tags | |
| get_warning_timeline | no tags | |
| get_regrade_kit | no tags | |
| get_luck_test | no tags | |
| get_corpus_insights | no tags | |
| get_governance | no tags |
Toxic-flow graph
The lethal trifecta, checked as a graph rather than as a checklist: untrusted input, a sensitive source and an external sink have to meet before there is a path worth worrying about.
The public result for this release does not print the flow graph, so there is nothing to show here. That is not the same as "no paths were found": what the scan did read is above, under coverage.
Supply chain and provenance
Integrityfirst-seen
Surface digest5d4ca405631e4fcb
Scanned2026-10-20
This is the first scan of this surface here, so there is nothing yet to compare it against.
Every result on this tab comes from one deterministic pass over the published package — offline, rule by rule, and auditable line by line above. Same methodology version, same bytes, same score.
Release history
This is an address its publisher runs: which release it serves is theirs to choose, so there is nothing here to pin. The history below is for reading; the current release on file is 1.1.0.
1.1.0
undated
latestNo release note was published with this version.
—
no reviews yet
Who can review
One review per account, from a signed-in account that does not publish this listing. Nothing else is asked — you can say what you think before you install it. Publishers can reply once per review, and a review can be edited or deleted by whoever wrote it.
Sign in to write one
Any signed-in account that does not publish JYOTINT Sealed Forecasts can review it, once — before installing it or after. A review from an account that has installed it is marked as one.
No reviews yet
Nobody has reviewed this listing. The rating on the card is the mean of the reviews written here and nothing else, so there is no rating until somebody writes the first — which takes a signed-in account that does not publish it, and nothing else.