Model Context Protocol (MCP) server for freee API integration
Nothing to run from here
Koalcheck is installed from its publisher's own source and answers where it runs, so this marketplace is not in the path of a single call. There is no address here to send one to, and a panel that pretended otherwise would be showing you an answer we made up. Install it and call it from your own client — the Installation tab has the entry for each one.
22
tools declared
—
trust score
remote
at its publisher
—
calls last 7d
What it does
TipRanks for X finfluencers — scores who's actually right vs SPY. Free & anonymous, no key.
Quickstart
# 1 — add it to Claude Code
claude mcp add --scope user --transport http koalcheck-mcp https://mcp.koalcheck.com/mcp
# 2 — ask your agent for something these tools do
# analyst_views, analyst_debate, search_x and 19 more
Koalcheck costs nothing on mcprush: there is no plan to choose here, no cap to set and nothing mcprush can bill you for.
Publishernot claimed
KOAll 1 server
koalcheck1 server
1 category
Collected from a public index. Nobody has claimed this account, so nothing here was written by its author — claim it if it is yours.
Installation
Where are you running it?
Every route below installs the same thing and ends at the same approval screen. Nothing here runs on your machine and nothing runs on ours: this server answers at its publisher’s own address, and what you install is the connection straight to it.
Claude Codedeclared by this listing
This is a public server: it answers at its publisher’s own address and this marketplace is not in the path. Claude Code registers it in one command; --scope user makes it available in every project. The transport below is http, as the publisher's own manifest declares it.
claude mcp add --scope user --transport http koalcheck-mcp https://mcp.koalcheck.com/mcpReconnect, or start a new session, and the tools appear in the model’s tool list.
Free on mcprush, and it answers at its publisher’s own address: this marketplace is not in the path, so there is no key of ours to hold and no card to add.
What it writes
One config entry pointing straight at the publisher’s own address — this marketplace is not in the path, and nothing from this listing executes on your machine.
What you approve
22 tools, with what each one reads, writes and reaches shown before you agree — the same list on every route above. Read the tool surface.
Tool surface
What the model actually sees. Descriptions are diffed on every release — see version history.
★ CORE. Fetch the recent views of specific X analysts/KOLs by handle. The user names the analysts they follow (e.g. ["DeItaone", "unusual_whales"]). Optionally focus on one ticker. Returns, per analyst: overall stance, which tickers they're talking about, and their recent points. Present this to the user as a SUMMARY in your own words ("最近 @X 看好…") — do NOT reproduce the original tweets verbat
| Parameter | Type | Required | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| handles | array | yes | — |
| ticker | no | — | |
| limit_per_analyst | integer | no | — |
★ CORE. Compare several analysts' takes on ONE ticker and surface the clash. Groups the named analysts into bull / bear / neutral camps and returns their points so you can construct each side's case (paraphrased), then judge whether BOTH opposing views are internally reasonable, what evidence would settle it, and where they talk past each other. Balanced analysis, not a recommendation.
| Parameter | Type | Required | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| handles | array | yes | — |
| ticker | string | yes | — |
| limit_per_analyst | integer | no | — |
Search X with full operators (e.g. '$AAPL lang:en -is:retweet', 'from:handle'). General-purpose X search with sentiment scoring; use analyst_views when the user cares about specific accounts. Summarize results; don't echo tweets verbatim.
| Parameter | Type | Required | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| query | string | yes | — |
| limit | integer | no | — |
| latest | boolean | no | — |
Blended retail sentiment for a ticker across X, StockTwits, and Reddit. Use this to corroborate (or challenge) an analyst's view with the broader crowd. sources defaults to all three.
| Parameter | Type | Required | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| ticker | string | yes | — |
| limit | integer | no | — |
| sources | no | — |
Recent StockTwits posts for a ticker with author-tagged bull/bear labels.
| Parameter | Type | Required | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| ticker | string | yes | — |
| limit | integer | no | — |
Tickers currently trending on StockTwits (a retail-attention radar).
| Parameter | Type | Required | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| limit | integer | no | — |
WSB retail-attention for a ticker: mention count, rank, and 24h momentum. Backed by ApeWisdom (reliable). A sharp jump in mentions/rank = a retail- attention spike — often a contrarian/risk flag, not a buy signal.
| Parameter | Type | Required | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| ticker | string | yes | — |
★ COMPOSITE (Pro). One signed score (−100 bearish … +100 bullish) that blends the analysts who called this ticker — each vote WEIGHTED BY THEIR TRACK RECORD (the moat) — with SEC insider buying/selling and free retail (StockTwits) sentiment. Shows a transparent per-component breakdown + coverage + confidence; absent components are renormalized away (not treated as neutral). FREE — reads stored an
| Parameter | Type | Required | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| ticker | string | yes | — |
| as_of | no | — | |
| audience | no | — |
★ SCREENER (Pro). Rank a universe of tickers by the composite score. source: 'analysts' (tickers your followed analysts have called — ranked by who's been RIGHT) | 'trending' (StockTwits + WSB retail-hot tickers) | or pass an explicit universe=[...]. mode: 'bullish' (highest composite first — multi-signal confluence) | 'divergence' (crowd hyped but smart money — insiders + accurate analysts — i
| Parameter | Type | Required | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| source | string | no | — |
| mode | string | no | — |
| universe | array | no | — |
| min_coverage | number | no | — |
| limit | integer | no | — |
| audience | no | — |
★ SEC 8-K — recent MATERIAL EVENTS (earnings, exec changes, M&A, restatements). Catalysts that should move or confirm an analyst's thesis, point-in-time by filing date. Item codes are mapped to plain language (2.02=earnings, 5.02=exec change, 4.02=restatement red flag, 7.01=guidance…). Free, keyless. Not advice.
| Parameter | Type | Required | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| ticker | string | yes | — |
| since_days | integer | no | — |
SEC/FINRA short-sale VOLUME % for a ticker (last few trading days). Heavy short volume = selling pressure or a squeeze setup (direction-ambiguous). This is daily short VOLUME (flow), NOT short INTEREST (outstanding). Free. Not advice.
| Parameter | Type | Required | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| ticker | string | yes | — |
| days | integer | no | — |
★ SEC fundamentals — is the company actually growing & profitable? Latest annual revenue + YoY growth, net income, net/gross margin from SEC XBRL (keyless, point-in-time by filing date). Use it to check whether an analyst's 'accelerating growth' narrative matches the reported numbers. FREE. Not advice.
| Parameter | Type | Required | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| ticker | string | yes | — |
| as_of | no | — |
★ SEC Form 4 — are company INSIDERS buying or selling this ticker? Open-market purchases/sales by officers, directors, and 10% owners (Section 16), point-in-time and KEYLESS from SEC EDGAR. Corroborates an analyst's view: "analyst bullish AND insiders buying" = high conviction; "analyst bullish BUT insiders dumping" = a contradiction worth flagging. Free. Analytics, not advice.
| Parameter | Type | Required | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| ticker | string | yes | — |
| since_days | integer | no | — |
Most-mentioned tickers on r/wallstreetbets right now (retail-attention radar, via ApeWisdom).
| Parameter | Type | Required | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| limit | integer | no | — |
★ ANTI-IMPOSTOR. Is this account the REAL, credible analyst — or a copycat? Returns the account's authenticity signals (verified, followers, account age, post count) and a credibility score (0-100) + label (high/medium/low-possible- impostor), plus its PERMANENT account id and any same-name accounts we've seen (so a user searching e.g. "Serenity" can tell the real @aleabitoreddit from a 1-tweet i
| Parameter | Type | Required | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| handle | string | yes | — |
★ MOAT (Pro). How ACCURATE has this analyst been? Scores their past calls against what the stock actually did vs the market (SPY). Resolves the @handle to the analyst's permanent account id (rename-proof), extracts scorable calls from stored tweets, evaluates each against historical prices at 1/5/21-day horizons (benchmark-adjusted abnormal return, point-in- time), and returns a scorecard: hit-ra
| Parameter | Type | Required | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| handle | string | yes | — |
| refresh | boolean | no | — |
What has this analyst called LATELY? Their most-recent STORED calls — ticker + direction (bullish/bearish) + date + a link to the original post (and a short snippet of it). PURE READ of already-stored data (no live fetch, no X cost): this is 'their recent views as we recorded them', distinct from analyst_track_record (how ACCURATE they've been) and from a live timeline pull. Resolve a fuzzy name/n
| Parameter | Type | Required | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| handle | string | yes | — |
| limit | integer | no | — |
Which analysts called this ticker, and were they right? Lists stored calls on the ticker with each call's benchmark-adjusted outcome at the given horizon. Analytics, not advice.
| Parameter | Type | Required | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| ticker | string | yes | — |
| horizon_days | integer | no | — |
Stats on the persisted tweet database (the durable, queryable record). Every analyst tweet fetched is stored with timestamp, tickers, sentiment, and media (image/video URLs). This is the backing data for provenance and for the analyst track-record features.
No parameter schema on file.
Live price + volume + turnover (换手率) + market cap + basic valuation for a ticker. Returns last price & % change, day open/high/low, volume + 10-day avg volume, turnover_pct (换手率 = volume ÷ shares outstanding), market cap, 52-week range, and best-effort trailing/forward P/E + P/S + sector. Intraday values are delayed ~15m. FREE (yfinance) — does NOT consume the daily live-fetch quota. Pair with sc
| Parameter | Type | Required | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| ticker | string | yes | — |
The honest track-record leaderboard — who has ACTUALLY been right (priced vs SPY). Reads the daily honest board (21d hit-rate, Wilson 95% CI, bull/bear split, cross-regime flag, point-in-time vs SPY). view: • 'proven' — PROVEN tier (Wilson-CI lower bound > 0.5 + cross-regime); the trust core • 'fade' (反指) — reliably WRONG (Wilson-CI upper bound < 0.5) — a CONTRARIAN signal, not a buy
| Parameter | Type | Required | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| view | string | no | — |
| horizon | string | no | — |
| limit | integer | no | — |
YOUR membership tier + today's live-fetch quota for THIS connection. Tells you the plan you're authenticated as (free / pro), how many of today's shared live-fetch pulls you've used (real-time search / view refresh / debate / x-sentiment all draw from one daily pool), and that DB-read tools are uncapped. Reflects ONLY your own account — never any global / operator data. Sign in via OAuth browser-
No parameter schema on file.
Free
$0 forever
- Every tool — any call limit is its publisher’s, not ours
- No card, and mcprush charges nothing for it
- Runs at its publisher’s own address — this marketplace is not in the path
- Nothing to cap, because mcprush bills nothing
What counts against your monthly calls
| Tool | Unit | Calls used | Out of the allowance |
|---|
Nothing here is billable: mcprush charges nothing to install Koalcheck or to call it, at any volume.
Call allowance · this installenforced at the gateway
Monthly allowance, in calls
—
—
Alert at 80% · then the tool returns a normal MCP error
Used this month: —
—Grade not published
No rule-by-rule report on file for this release
Two independent axes, because powerful and malicious are different questions. The grade is threat only. The capability level is blast radius, and it is never a penalty on the grade — it is priced as one subtract-only term in the score, where you can see it.
This listing is an address its publisher runs, and you connect to it directly — this marketplace is not in the path. The scanner reads packages and public source, and an address is neither. So there is no grade — not a withheld one, an unmeasured one.
Release history
This is an address its publisher runs: which release it serves is theirs to choose, so there is nothing here to pin. The history below is for reading; the current release on file is 1.0.0.
1.0.0
undated
latestNo release note was published with this version.
—
no reviews yet
Who can review
One review per account, from a signed-in account that does not publish this listing. Nothing else is asked — you can say what you think before you install it. Publishers can reply once per review, and a review can be edited or deleted by whoever wrote it.
Sign in to write one
Any signed-in account that does not publish Koalcheck can review it, once — before installing it or after. A review from an account that has installed it is marked as one.
No reviews yet
Nobody has reviewed this listing. The rating on the card is the mean of the reviews written here and nothing else, so there is no rating until somebody writes the first — which takes a signed-in account that does not publish it, and nothing else.