Comprehensive Model Context Protocol server for managing Home Assistant through AI assistants.
Taiwan Law is installed from its publisher's own source and answers where it runs, so this marketplace is not in the path of a single call. There is no address here to send one to, and a panel that pretended otherwise would be showing you an answer we made up. Install it and call it from your own client — the Installation tab has the entry for each one.
What it does
Taiwan legal research MCP: judgments, national statutes, constitutional interpretations/rulings and legislative history; 12 tools, each repl
Quickstart
# 1 — add it to Claude Code
claude mcp add --scope user --transport http taiwan-law-mcp https://legaltech.org.tw/mcp
# 2 — ask your agent for something these tools do
# analyze_legal_intent, search_taiwan_laws, search_taiwan_judgments and 11 more
Taiwan Law costs nothing on mcprush: there is no plan to choose here, no cap to set and nothing mcprush can bill you for.
Collected from a public index. Nobody has claimed this account, so nothing here was written by its author — claim it if it is yours.
Where are you running it?
Every route below installs the same thing and ends at the same approval screen. Nothing here runs on your machine and nothing runs on ours: this server answers at its publisher’s own address, and what you install is the connection straight to it.
This is a public server: it answers at its publisher’s own address and this marketplace is not in the path. Claude Code registers it in one command; --scope user makes it available in every project. The transport below is http, as the publisher's own manifest declares it.
claude mcp add --scope user --transport http taiwan-law-mcp https://legaltech.org.tw/mcpReconnect, or start a new session, and the tools appear in the model’s tool list.
One config entry pointing straight at the publisher’s own address — this marketplace is not in the path, and nothing from this listing executes on your machine.
14 tools, with what each one reads, writes and reaches shown before you agree — the same list on every route above. Read the tool surface.
Tool surface
What the model actually sees. Descriptions are diffed on every release — see version history.
將使用者輸入初步分為案例事實、法律問題或引註研究,並標示領域、隱私風險與建議檢索詞。不做法律結論。
| Parameter | Type | Required | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| text | string | yes | 使用者的案例事實或法律問題 |
即時查詢法務部全國法規資料庫,回傳官方網址與相關條文。可附修法沿革。回答時必須附上 source_url,並提醒使用者核對最新版本。與其他法規檢索途徑併用時,請以 pcode/法律編號合併去重;無官方識別碼的候選結果不得作為引用依據。
| Parameter | Type | Required | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| query | string | yes | 法規名稱或法律爭點,例如:個人資料保護法 蒐集。支援常見簡稱(勞基法、個資法…) |
| article_number | string | no | 可選條號,例如 19 或 247-1 |
| limit | integer | no | — |
| include_history | boolean | no | 附上修法沿革(歷次公布/修正紀錄,來自本地官方資料快照) |
| fresh | boolean | no | 略過邊緣快取,強制向官方資料庫取得最新內容(例如剛公布的修正條文) |
即時使用司法院裁判書系統搜尋公開裁判,不保存裁判內容。結果按法院層級排序(最高→高等→地方),每筆含法院、案件類型、日期、案由。查特定案號請用 case_word + case_number(例:114年度上易字第503號 → case_word=上易, case_number=503, year_from=114),不要放進 query。main_text 以裁判主文措辭篩選輸贏方(例:「被告應給付」= 被告敗訴、「原告之訴駁回」= 原告敗訴、「上訴駁回」= 維持原審),可與 query 併用。若同時使用語意/概念式檢索工具,建議兩軌並行後以司法院 JID 合併去重,JID 皆命中者優先;沒有 JID 的候選結果僅供瀏覽,不得直接引為法院見解。
| Parameter | Type | Required | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| query | string | no | 全文檢索關鍵字,例如:預售屋 遲延交屋 |
| court | string | no | 法院名稱,例如:最高法院、臺灣臺北地方法院 |
| case_type | string | no | — |
| year_from | integer | no | 起始年度(民國年) |
| year_to | integer | no | 截止年度(民國年) |
| case_word | string | no | 字別,例如:台上、上易、重訴 |
| case_number | string | no | 案號數字 |
| main_text | string | no | 裁判主文關鍵字(輸贏方篩選) |
| limit | integer | no | — |
依司法院 JID 取得裁判全文與官方網址。回應得經至多 6 小時邊緣快取(cached/retrieved_at 標示);需最新狀態或裁判疑似已下架時,設 fresh=true 強制向官方重抓。
| Parameter | Type | Required | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| jid | string | yes | 司法院裁判書 JID |
| fresh | boolean | no | 略過邊緣快取,強制向司法院取得最新內容 |
在 11,700+ 部法規(法律+命令)名稱中做關鍵字搜尋,回傳法規名稱、pcode 與現行/已廢止狀態。離線資料快照,即時回應。
| Parameter | Type | Required | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| keyword | string | yes | 搜尋關鍵字,例如:勞動、消費、智慧財產 |
| offset | integer | no | 分頁偏移,每頁 50 筆 |
| exclude_abolished | boolean | no | 排除已廢止法規 |
將法規名稱(含常見簡稱如勞基法、個資法)轉換為全國法規資料庫 pcode 代碼,支援模糊比對與建議。
| Parameter | Type | Required | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| law_name | string | yes | 法規名稱,例如:民法、勞基法、消保法 |
取得釋字(第 1-813 號)或憲判字(111 年起)內容,來自官方公告文書的本地快照,即時回應。預設回傳字號/日期/爭點/解釋文等精簡層;理由書與意見書需 opt-in:優先用 reasoning_keyword / opinions_keyword 取關鍵字片段(省 token),確有需要才用 include_* 取全文(超過 15000 字會截斷並警告)。
| Parameter | Type | Required | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| case_id | string | yes | 字號,例如:釋字第748號、釋字748、111年憲判字第1號、111憲判1 |
| include_reasoning | boolean | no | 回傳理由書全文 |
| reasoning_keyword | string | no | 在理由書中搜尋關鍵字並回片段(優先於 include_reasoning) |
| include_opinions | boolean | no | 回傳意見書全文 |
| opinions_keyword | string | no | 在意見書中搜尋關鍵字並回片段 |
列舉或全文搜尋釋字與憲判字(搜標題、爭點/案由與理由書全文)。每筆結果帶 case_id,可直接傳給 get_taiwan_interpretation。
| Parameter | Type | Required | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| keyword | string | no | 關鍵字(標題/字號/爭點/理由書全文匹配),例如:集會自由 |
| year | integer | no | 篩選民國年度(僅憲判字),0=不篩選 |
| number_from | integer | no | 起始號次(含),0=不篩選 |
| number_to | integer | no | 截止號次(含),0=不篩選 |
| include_old | boolean | no | 包含舊制釋字 |
| include_new | boolean | no | 包含新制憲判字 |
| deep | boolean | no | 同時全文搜尋理由書(較慢);預設僅搜字號/標題/爭點索引 |
| max_results | integer | no | — |
從釋字/憲判字理由書中抽取引用的其他釋字與憲判字字號(往前追溯),可附引用處前後 80 字片段。
| Parameter | Type | Required | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| case_id | string | yes | 字號,格式同 get_taiwan_interpretation |
| include_context | boolean | no | 每個引用附上原文片段 |
查立法院開放資料平台(data.ly.gov.tw 官方直連)取得法律的立法歷程:該法所有修法提案的提案人、連署人、議案狀態與官方關係文書(PDF/DOC)連結。補「修法沿革」上游的立法過程(誰提案、審到哪裡)。資料授權:政府資料開放授權條款第 1 版(與 CC-BY-4.0 相容)。
| Parameter | Type | Required | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| law | string | yes | 法律名稱(如:勞動基準法) |
| max_bills | integer | no | 回傳提案數上限(依最近會議日期排序) |
查立法院開放資料平台(官方直連)取得法律的三讀通過紀錄與附帶決議:三讀屆會次、三讀通過條文 PDF、附帶決議內容。涵蓋近年(2023 起)三讀紀錄;完整修正沿革請併用 search_taiwan_laws 查全國法規資料庫。資料授權:政府資料開放授權條款第 1 版。
| Parameter | Type | Required | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| law | string | yes | 法律名稱(如:道路交通管理處罰條例) |
| limit | integer | no | — |
搜尋立法院議案提案(官方直連 data.ly.gov.tw):以提案名稱關鍵字、提案人、屆期、議案狀態查詢。回傳議案編號、名稱、提案單位、提案人與連署人、議案狀態與官方關係文書 PDF/DOC 連結。資料授權:政府資料開放授權條款第 1 版。
| Parameter | Type | Required | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| keyword | string | no | 關鍵字(例:勞動基準法、最低工資) |
| proposer | string | no | 提案人姓名 |
| term | integer | no | 屆期(例:11) |
| bill_status | string | no | 議案狀態(例:交付審查、三讀) |
| limit | integer | no | — |
在法務部主管法規查詢系統(mojlaw.moj.gov.tw)以關鍵字搜尋行政函釋、法規諮詢意見、法律問題座談等文書,回傳發文字號、日期、要旨與官方網址。涵蓋範圍限法務部主管文書;即時查詢、不保存副本。
| Parameter | Type | Required | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| keyword | string | yes | 關鍵字(例:消滅時效、借名登記) |
| doc_types | array | no | 文書類型(可多選) |
| limit | integer | no | — |
取得法務部主管法規系統的法規草案預告清單(含官方網址);可一併回傳近期法規訊息(修正條文、行政規則發布等)。涵蓋範圍限法務部。
| Parameter | Type | Required | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| include_all_news | boolean | no | 一併回傳近期所有法規訊息 |
| limit | integer | no | — |
- Every tool — any call limit is its publisher’s, not ours
- No card, and mcprush charges nothing for it
- Runs at its publisher’s own address — this marketplace is not in the path
- Nothing to cap, because mcprush bills nothing
What counts against your monthly calls
| Tool | Unit | Calls used | Out of the allowance |
|---|
Nothing here is billable: mcprush charges nothing to install Taiwan Law or to call it, at any volume.
Two independent axes, because powerful and malicious are different questions. The grade is threat only. The capability level is blast radius, and it is never a penalty on the grade — it is priced as one subtract-only term in the score, where you can see it.
| Term | Level | What it prices | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
| capability-exposure | minimal | capability blast radius (minimal) — client exposure if the model is manipulated | −0 |
| coverage-honesty | manifest | inspection depth (manifest) — how much of the target the scan could see | −4 |
What the scan could actually read
A grade is only as meaningful as its coverage, so the scanner publishes its own depth before it publishes its result.
The scan read each tool’s name, description, input schema and annotations exactly as the server listed them the last time it answered us; no code was reviewed. We ask the server again about once a month, and a list that changed is graded again.
The implementation source was not read — this reflects the declared tool metadata only.
Capability — what it could do if the model were manipulated
Tags derived from each tool’s schema and the implementation, not from what the tool calls itself. minimal is the level these add up to.
| Tool | Capability tags | Why the tag was assigned |
|---|---|---|
| analyze_legal_intent | no tags | |
| search_taiwan_laws | no tags | |
| search_taiwan_judgments | no tags | |
| get_taiwan_judgment | no tags | |
| search_taiwan_regulations | no tags | |
| get_taiwan_pcode | no tags | |
| get_taiwan_interpretation | no tags | |
| search_taiwan_interpretations | no tags | |
| get_taiwan_interpretation_citations | no tags | |
| get_taiwan_law_progress | no tags | |
| get_taiwan_law_versions | no tags | |
| search_taiwan_bills | no tags | |
| search_moj_interpretations | no tags | |
| get_moj_draft_announcements | no tags |
Toxic-flow graph
The lethal trifecta, checked as a graph rather than as a checklist: untrusted input, a sensitive source and an external sink have to meet before there is a path worth worrying about.
The public result for this release does not print the flow graph, so there is nothing to show here. That is not the same as "no paths were found": what the scan did read is above, under coverage.
Supply chain and provenance
This is the first scan of this surface here, so there is nothing yet to compare it against.
Every result on this tab comes from one deterministic pass over the published package — offline, rule by rule, and auditable line by line above. Same methodology version, same bytes, same score.
Release history
This is an address its publisher runs: which release it serves is theirs to choose, so there is nothing here to pin. The history below is for reading; the current release on file is 0.3.0.
No release note was published with this version.
One review per account, from a signed-in account that does not publish this listing. Nothing else is asked — you can say what you think before you install it. Publishers can reply once per review, and a review can be edited or deleted by whoever wrote it.
Any signed-in account that does not publish Taiwan Law can review it, once — before installing it or after. A review from an account that has installed it is marked as one.
Nobody has reviewed this listing. The rating on the card is the mean of the reviews written here and nothing else, so there is no rating until somebody writes the first — which takes a signed-in account that does not publish it, and nothing else.