Model Context Protocol (MCP) server for Apollo.io API integration
ListPlus is installed from its publisher's own source and answers where it runs, so this marketplace is not in the path of a single call. There is no address here to send one to, and a panel that pretended otherwise would be showing you an answer we made up. Install it and call it from your own client — the Installation tab has the entry for each one.
What it does
Check contact data with 100+ quality checks, find B2B contacts, fill work e-mail and mobile.
Quickstart
# 1 — add it to Claude Code
claude mcp add --scope user --transport http listplus-mcp https://listplus.ai/mcp
# 2 — ask your agent for something these tools do
# what_can_you_do, find_person, check_records and 3 more
ListPlus costs nothing on mcprush: there is no plan to choose here, no cap to set and nothing mcprush can bill you for.
Collected from a public index. Nobody has claimed this account, so nothing here was written by its author — claim it if it is yours.
Where are you running it?
Every route below installs the same thing and ends at the same approval screen. Nothing here runs on your machine and nothing runs on ours: this server answers at its publisher’s own address, and what you install is the connection straight to it.
This is a public server: it answers at its publisher’s own address and this marketplace is not in the path. Claude Code registers it in one command; --scope user makes it available in every project. The transport below is http, as the publisher's own manifest declares it.
claude mcp add --scope user --transport http listplus-mcp https://listplus.ai/mcpReconnect, or start a new session, and the tools appear in the model’s tool list.
Nothing is required, but it can take Authorization header (Optional: your ListPlus agent key (listplus.ai/app/agents). Clients that support OAuth sign in instead. Without either, the checks and the person search work; enriching needs one.) if you want to set it.
One config entry pointing straight at the publisher’s own address — this marketplace is not in the path, and nothing from this listing executes on your machine.
6 tools, with what each one reads, writes and reaches shown before you agree — the same list on every route above. Read the tool surface.
Tool surface
What the model actually sees. Descriptions are diffed on every release — see version history.
FREE — what ListPlus can do for you: every action, the fields we can fill with their price per record, the free limits, and (with a key) your balance and day budget. Call this first if unsure.
| Parameter | Type | Required | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| language | string | no | Language of tell_your_user (default en) |
FREE (rate-limited) — find a person: name, job title, company, location, LinkedIn profile, how sure. Give first_name + last_name + company (or domain), a LinkedIn URL, a work e-mail, or a question in query ("CFO of Tink in Berlin"). No e-mail or phone in the answer — those are enrich_records.
| Parameter | Type | Required | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| first_name | string | no | — |
| last_name | string | no | — |
| name | string | no | Full name, when there is no split |
| company | string | no | — |
| domain | string | no | — |
| linkedin_url | string | no | — |
| string | no | A WORK e-mail (not Gmail etc.) | |
| query | string | no | — |
| eu_only | boolean | no | Only services in the EU (skips one US web index) |
| language | string | no | Language of tell_your_user (default en) |
FREE (up to 25 records without a key, 1000 with one) — check contact records for errors with 100+ checks: typos in e-mail domains, role mailboxes (office@), duplicates and near-duplicates, phone codes that do not fit the country, LinkedIn status text in names, placeholders … Returns findings per record with proposed fixes. Nothing is stored or changed.
| Parameter | Type | Required | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| records | array | yes | Records as JSON objects. Any key names (e.g. first_name, last_name, email, company_name, domain, linkedin_profile_url, job_title, phone, country, city — or Vorname, Firma, Mail …); the answer says how |
| categories | array | no | Only these areas: name, email, company, linkedin, job_title, phone, address, gender, duplicates, completeness, cross_field, compliance, campaign |
| ai | boolean | no | Also run the AI checks (fake names, a person's name as company, department instead of job title, city vs country) — PAID, needs a key; the price range is in options |
| language | string | no | Language of tell_your_user (default en) |
PAID (needs a key) — per record from a name + company: work e-mail ≈2.39, at most 9 credits; mobile ≈3.84, at most 12; job title ≈1.41, at most 13.5. Charged per hit for e-mail and phone. Use estimate:true first for the exact price of YOUR records (free, no key). Fills fields of contact records (work e-mail, mobile, job title, LinkedIn profile, company, domain, industry, size, place). The records
| Parameter | Type | Required | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| records | array | yes | Records as JSON objects. Any key names (e.g. first_name, last_name, email, company_name, domain, linkedin_profile_url, job_title, phone, country, city — or Vorname, Firma, Mail …); the answer says how |
| fields | array | yes | Fields to fill: email, phone, job_title, linkedin_profile_url, company_name, domain, industry, city, country |
| max_credits | number | no | The most this call may cost (default: the key's day budget left) |
| estimate | boolean | no | true = only the price for these records, nothing runs (free, no key needed) |
| request_id | string | no | Your id for this call — a repeat with it gets the same job |
| language | string | no | Language of tell_your_user (default en) |
FREE (key) — the state of an enrich_records job; when it ended, the records with the fields we found (in the order you sent them).
| Parameter | Type | Required | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| job_id | string | yes | — |
| language | string | no | Language of tell_your_user (default en) |
PAID (needs a key) — 0.3 credits per address (an address checked in the last 7 days costs nothing): is the e-mail address deliverable (valid, invalid, catch_all, unknown)? Up to 25 addresses per call, answered at once.
| Parameter | Type | Required | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| emails | array | yes | — |
| language | string | no | Language of tell_your_user (default en) |
- Every tool — any call limit is its publisher’s, not ours
- No card, and mcprush charges nothing for it
- Runs at its publisher’s own address — this marketplace is not in the path
- Nothing to cap, because mcprush bills nothing
What counts against your monthly calls
| Tool | Unit | Calls used | Out of the allowance |
|---|
Nothing here is billable: mcprush charges nothing to install ListPlus or to call it, at any volume.
Two independent axes, because powerful and malicious are different questions. The grade is threat only. The capability level is blast radius, and it is never a penalty on the grade — it is priced as one subtract-only term in the score, where you can see it.
| Term | Level | What it prices | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
| capability-exposure | moderate | capability blast radius (moderate) — client exposure if the model is manipulated | −3 |
| coverage-honesty | manifest | inspection depth (manifest) — how much of the target the scan could see | −4 |
What the scan could actually read
A grade is only as meaningful as its coverage, so the scanner publishes its own depth before it publishes its result.
The scan read each tool’s name, description, input schema and annotations exactly as the server listed them the last time it answered us; no code was reviewed. We ask the server again about once a month, and a list that changed is graded again.
The implementation source was not read — this reflects the declared tool metadata only.
Capability — what it could do if the model were manipulated
Tags derived from each tool’s schema and the implementation, not from what the tool calls itself. moderate is the level these add up to.
| Tool | Capability tags | Why the tag was assigned |
|---|---|---|
| what_can_you_do | untrusted-input | untrusted-input: declares openWorldHint: true (interacts with entities outside the server) |
| find_person | untrusted-input | untrusted-input: declares openWorldHint: true (interacts with entities outside the server) |
| check_records | untrusted-input | untrusted-input: declares openWorldHint: true (interacts with entities outside the server) |
| enrich_records | external-sink | external-sink: declares readOnlyHint: false, openWorldHint: true |
| get_job | untrusted-input | untrusted-input: declares openWorldHint: true (interacts with entities outside the server) |
| verify_email | external-sink | external-sink: declares readOnlyHint: false, openWorldHint: true |
Toxic-flow graph
The lethal trifecta, checked as a graph rather than as a checklist: untrusted input, a sensitive source and an external sink have to meet before there is a path worth worrying about.
Supply chain and provenance
This is the first scan of this surface here, so there is nothing yet to compare it against.
Every result on this tab comes from one deterministic pass over the published package — offline, rule by rule, and auditable line by line above. Same methodology version, same bytes, same score.
Release history
This is an address its publisher runs: which release it serves is theirs to choose, so there is nothing here to pin. The history below is for reading; the current release on file is 1.0.0.
No release note was published with this version.
One review per account, from a signed-in account that does not publish this listing. Nothing else is asked — you can say what you think before you install it. Publishers can reply once per review, and a review can be edited or deleted by whoever wrote it.
Any signed-in account that does not publish ListPlus can review it, once — before installing it or after. A review from an account that has installed it is marked as one.
Nobody has reviewed this listing. The rating on the card is the mean of the reviews written here and nothing else, so there is no rating until somebody writes the first — which takes a signed-in account that does not publish it, and nothing else.