Local MCP capabilities provider for Expo
Nothing to run from here
MacTech CMMC / NIST 800-171 is installed from its publisher's own source and answers where it runs, so this marketplace is not in the path of a single call. There is no address here to send one to, and a panel that pretended otherwise would be showing you an answer we made up. Install it and call it from your own client — the Installation tab has the entry for each one.
13
tools declared
—
trust score
remote
at its publisher
—
calls last 7d
What it does
NIST 800-171 controls and 800-171A objectives, crosswalks, exact SPRS scoring, POA&M generation.
Quickstart
# 1 — add it to Claude Code
claude mcp add --scope user --transport http mactech-cmmc-nist-800-171-mcp https://www.mactechsolutionsllc.com/api/mcp
# 2 — ask your agent for something these tools do
# lookup_control, list_controls, calculate_sprs_score and 10 more
MacTech CMMC / NIST 800-171 costs nothing on mcprush: there is no plan to choose here, no cap to set and nothing mcprush can bill you for.
Publishernot claimed
MAAll 3 servers
mactechsolutionsllc3 servers
2 categories
Collected from a public index. Nobody has claimed this account, so nothing here was written by its author — claim it if it is yours.
Installation
Where are you running it?
Every route below installs the same thing and ends at the same approval screen. Nothing here runs on your machine and nothing runs on ours: this server answers at its publisher’s own address, and what you install is the connection straight to it.
Claude Codedeclared by this listing
This is a public server: it answers at its publisher’s own address and this marketplace is not in the path. Claude Code registers it in one command; --scope user makes it available in every project. The transport below is http, as the publisher's own manifest declares it.
claude mcp add --scope user --transport http mactech-cmmc-nist-800-171-mcp https://www.mactechsolutionsllc.com/api/mcpReconnect, or start a new session, and the tools appear in the model’s tool list.
Free on mcprush, and it answers at its publisher’s own address: this marketplace is not in the path, so there is no key of ours to hold and no card to add.
What it writes
One config entry pointing straight at the publisher’s own address — this marketplace is not in the path, and nothing from this listing executes on your machine.
What you approve
13 tools, with what each one reads, writes and reaches shown before you agree — the same list on every route above. Read the tool surface.
Tool surface
What the model actually sees. Descriptions are diffed on every release — see version history.
Get one NIST SP 800-171 Rev 2 security requirement by number (e.g. "3.5.3"): the full requirement text, its control family, and its exact DoD Assessment Methodology (SPRS) point weight, including the sliding-scale rules for 3.5.3 (MFA) and 3.13.11 (FIPS cryptography). Call this when the user asks what a specific 800-171 or CMMC Level 2 control requires or how many SPRS points it is worth. Pass sec
| Parameter | Type | Required | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| control | string | yes | Control number, e.g. "3.1.1" or "3.13.11" |
| sections | array | no | Extra views to include: "objectives" for the 800-171A assessment objectives (how an assessor tests it), "crosswalk" for the 800-53 / CSF 2.0 / SOC 2 mappings. Omit for the requirement and its weight a |
List NIST SP 800-171 Rev 2 requirements with their DoD Assessment Methodology (SPRS) weights, optionally filtered by control family name or by point weight (5, 3, or 1). Call this to enumerate the 110 CMMC Level 2 controls, to find all 5-point (highest-impact) requirements, or to see everything in one family such as Access Control. Returns identifiers and weights only - use lookup_control for one
| Parameter | Type | Required | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| family | string | no | Filter by control family |
| weight | no | Filter by DoD assessment point weight | |
| verbose | boolean | no | Include the full requirement text for every result. Off by default: an unfiltered verbose listing is ~25× larger and is rarely what the question needs. |
Compute an exact SPRS score per the DoD Assessment Methodology: start at 110 and subtract each unimplemented requirement's Annex A weight (floor −203). Pass the control numbers that are NOT implemented; optionally pass 3.5.3 and/or 3.13.11 as partially implemented for their sliding-scale values (MFA for privileged/remote only = −3; encryption present but not FIPS-validated = −3). Also reports whet
| Parameter | Type | Required | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| not_implemented | array | yes | Rev 2 control numbers not implemented, e.g. ["3.5.3", "3.11.2"]. An empty array means all 110 implemented (score 110). Rev 3 identifiers are rejected - there is no DoD scoring methodology for Rev 3. |
| partially_implemented | array | no | Sliding-scale controls at their partial value: 3.5.3 (MFA for privileged and remote users only) and/or 3.13.11 (encryption employed but not FIPS-validated). Deducts 3 instead of 5. |
Get the official NIST SP 800-171A assessment objectives for one NIST SP 800-171 Rev 2 requirement - the exact "Determine if..." objectives a CMMC Level 2 assessor scores, plus the potential assessment methods (what an assessor examines, who they interview, what they test). Call this when the user asks how a control is assessed, what evidence an assessor will look for, or how to prepare a specific
| Parameter | Type | Required | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| control | string | yes | Control number, e.g. "3.5.3" |
Map a security control across frameworks: NIST SP 800-171 Rev 2 ↔ NIST SP 800-53 (FedRAMP Moderate) ↔ NIST CSF 2.0 ↔ SOC 2 Trust Services Criteria. Accepts an 800-171 number ("3.5.3"), an 800-53 id ("AC-2"), a CSF category ("PR.AA" style / "GV.RM"), or a SOC 2 criterion ("CC6"). Call this when the user asks what a control corresponds to in another framework, or how existing FedRAMP/SOC 2/CSF work
| Parameter | Type | Required | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| control | string | yes | A control id from any supported framework, e.g. "3.1.1", "AC-2", "GV.RM", or "CC6" |
Determine which CMMC level (1, 2, or 3) applies to a defense contractor based on the data they handle and the clauses in their contracts, and - separately - which assessment type may actually be designated today. Those are not the same question: CMMC Phase II was suspended on 13 July 2026, so C3PAO and DIBCAC assessments cannot currently be designated even where the level calls for one. Call this
| Parameter | Type | Required | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| handles_cui | string | yes | Does the organization store, process, or transmit Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI) - e.g. technical data, drawings, specs above general descriptive material? |
| contract_clauses | array | no | FAR/DFARS clauses present in their contracts, if known |
List all 17 CMMC Level 1 basic safeguarding practices with their FAR 52.204-21 clause citations - the complete requirement set for contractors handling Federal Contract Information (FCI) only. Call this when the user asks what CMMC Level 1 requires.
No parameter schema on file.
Turn a list of unimplemented NIST SP 800-171 controls into structured Plan of Action & Milestones (POA&M) entries, and - the part that decides whether the plan is usable - sort them by eligibility under 32 CFR 170.21. Most gaps CANNOT go on a CMMC Level 2 POA&M: the rule bars every requirement worth more than 1 point (excepting 3.13.11 when encryption is employed but not FIPS-validated), bars six
| Parameter | Type | Required | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| gaps | array | yes | The unimplemented or partially implemented controls |
| conditionalStatusDate | string | no | Conditional CMMC Status Date (YYYY-MM-DD), if one exists. The 180-day closeout window runs from this date - NOT from the day the plan is written - so without it no deadline can be computed. |
Determine whether a contractor can legally be awarded a given contract type, based on the business systems that type requires. A cost-reimbursement contract may be awarded only if the accounting system is adequate for determining costs (FAR 16.301-3), and T&M billing cannot be substantiated without compliant timekeeping - so this is an eligibility gate, not a preference. Call this before a bid/no-
| Parameter | Type | Required | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| contract_type | string | no | The contract type named in the solicitation. Omit to compare all types. |
| include_sf1408 | boolean | no | Include the SF1408 pre-award accounting system survey criteria. |
Explain what a FAR or DFARS cybersecurity clause obliges a contractor to do: what triggers it, the concrete duties, the reporting deadlines, what it flows down to subcontractors, and which other clauses come with it. Covers 52.204-21, 252.204-7008, 252.204-7012, 252.204-7019, 252.204-7020, 252.204-7021, 252.239-7010. Call this when someone asks "my contract has 7012 in it, what do I have to do", w
| Parameter | Type | Required | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| clause | string | no | Clause number - "7012", "252.204-7012", or "DFARS 252.204-7012" all work. Omit to list every clause covered. |
Work out which assets fall inside a CMMC assessment boundary, and what each category obliges. Returns the DoD asset categories (CUI Asset, Security Protection Asset, Contractor Risk Managed Asset, Specialized Asset, Out-of-Scope) with how each is treated at assessment, plus the CUI categories that most often pull a defense contractor into scope unexpectedly. Call this when someone asks what is in
| Parameter | Type | Required | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| level | yes | CMMC level being scoped. Level 1 has no asset taxonomy - everything touching FCI is in scope. | |
| include_cui_categories | boolean | no | Include the common CUI categories and the traps that hide them. Useful when the contractor is unsure whether they hold CUI at all. |
Get one NIST SP 800-171 REVISION 3 requirement by its zero-padded number (e.g. "03.01.01"): the requirement statement, its organization-defined parameters, the 800-171A Rev 3 assessment objectives, and whether it was withdrawn. Rev 3 has 97 active requirements of 130 numbered across 17 families, with 88 ODPs and 422 objectives. IMPORTANT: Rev 3 is NOT currently binding for DoD contracts - DFARS 25
| Parameter | Type | Required | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| requirement | string | yes | Rev 3 requirement number, e.g. "03.01.01" or "3.1.1" (zero-padded automatically). This is a Rev 3 identifier - it is NOT the same requirement as the Rev 2 control with the similar number. |
Explain how NIST SP 800-171 Rev 2 and Rev 3 differ, and what happened to a specific requirement between them. Call this when someone is implementing Rev 3 early, holds a Rev 3 citation and needs the Rev 2 obligation, or asks which revision applies to them. Answers the question DoD guidance forces on early adopters: assessments still run against Rev 2, so Rev 2 gaps must be closed regardless of wha
| Parameter | Type | Required | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| requirement | string | no | Optional: a specific requirement in either scheme, e.g. "3.5.3" (Rev 2) or "03.05.03" (Rev 3). Omit for the structural summary alone. |
Free
$0 forever
- Every tool — any call limit is its publisher’s, not ours
- No card, and mcprush charges nothing for it
- Runs at its publisher’s own address — this marketplace is not in the path
- Nothing to cap, because mcprush bills nothing
What counts against your monthly calls
| Tool | Unit | Calls used | Out of the allowance |
|---|
Nothing here is billable: mcprush charges nothing to install MacTech CMMC / NIST 800-171 or to call it, at any volume.
Call allowance · this installenforced at the gateway
Monthly allowance, in calls
—
—
Alert at 80% · then the tool returns a normal MCP error
Used this month: —
—Grade not published
No rule-by-rule report on file for this release
Two independent axes, because powerful and malicious are different questions. The grade is threat only. The capability level is blast radius, and it is never a penalty on the grade — it is priced as one subtract-only term in the score, where you can see it.
This listing is an address its publisher runs, and you connect to it directly — this marketplace is not in the path. The scanner reads packages and public source, and an address is neither. So there is no grade — not a withheld one, an unmeasured one.
Release history
This is an address its publisher runs: which release it serves is theirs to choose, so there is nothing here to pin. The history below is for reading; the current release on file is 1.2.0.
1.2.0
undated
latestNo release note was published with this version.
—
no reviews yet
Who can review
One review per account, from a signed-in account that does not publish this listing. Nothing else is asked — you can say what you think before you install it. Publishers can reply once per review, and a review can be edited or deleted by whoever wrote it.
Sign in to write one
Any signed-in account that does not publish MacTech CMMC / NIST 800-171 can review it, once — before installing it or after. A review from an account that has installed it is marked as one.
No reviews yet
Nobody has reviewed this listing. The rating on the card is the mean of the reviews written here and nothing else, so there is no rating until somebody writes the first — which takes a signed-in account that does not publish it, and nothing else.