3GPP MCP Server V3.0.0 - Direct access to TSpec-LLM dataset (arxiv.org/abs/2406.01768) and 3GPP specifications via external APIs
Health check: confirm the eDiscovery Decoder News/Calc MCP server is reachable before a demo or when troubleshooting a connection. Returns server name and version. No inputs.
ArgumentsA call is made on an account: it counts against an allowance and the publisher sees it, which is why this one asks who you are first.
What it does
Free educational MCP for read-only eDiscovery news and TAR/review calculators.
Quickstart
# 1 — install (mcprush login holds a key from your dashboard)
npx mcprush@latest add ediscovery-decoder-news-calc-mcp
# 2 — ask your agent something
> Free educational MCP for read-only eDiscovery news and TAR/review calculators.
eDiscovery Decoder News/Calc is free: there is no plan to choose, no cap to set and nothing that can bill you.
Collected from a public index. Nobody has claimed this account, so nothing here was written by its author — claim it if it is yours.
Where are you running it?
Every route below installs the same thing and ends at the same approval screen. Nothing here runs on your machine — this server runs on the publisher’s own infrastructure behind our gateway, and what you install is the connection to it.
This is a public server: you run it yourself and this marketplace is not in the path. Claude Code registers it in one command.
claude mcp add --transport http ediscovery-decoder-news-calc-mcp https://mcp.ediscoverydecoder.com/mcpReconnect, or start a new session, and the tools appear in the model’s tool list.
One config entry pointing at the gateway. The server itself runs on the publisher’s own infrastructure, so nothing from this listing executes on your machine.
15 tools, with what each one reads, writes and reaches shown before you agree — the same list on every route above. Read the tool surface.
Tool surface
What the model actually sees. Descriptions are diffed on every release — see version history.
Health check: confirm the eDiscovery Decoder News/Calc MCP server is reachable before a demo or when troubleshooting a connection. Returns server name and version. No inputs.
Takes no parameters.
List the full eDiscovery Decoder MCP surface — every tool, prompt, and resource, plus the suggested demo flow and safety boundaries — with an example prompt for each. Call this first when you are unsure which tool fits the user's question, or when tool-search shows only a partial list.
Takes no parameters.
Return a short, human-readable walkthrough for testing this server: the endpoint, the tool/prompt/resource names, and ready-to-paste sample prompts. Use to give someone a guided demo. For the full machine-readable capability catalog, use list_capabilities instead.
Takes no parameters.
Fetch the JSON behind a supported edd:// resource — the demo guide, TAR learning path, glossary, or news (latest / brief / by-date). Use when you want resource content but the client cannot read MCP resources directly, e.g. to pull glossary definitions or the news brief as a normal tool result.
Takes no parameters.
Return the rendered text of one of this server's guided prompts (mcp-demo-tour, tar-matter-kickoff, weekly-digest). Use when the client can call tools but cannot open MCP prompts directly, or when you want to inspect a prompt's wording before using it.
Takes no parameters.
Find recent eDiscovery / legal-AI / TAR news by topic, tag, or date range. Use when the user asks what's new or recent in eDiscovery, wants stories on a subject, or asks about a time window. For a ready-made top-stories roundup instead, use get_news_brief.
Takes no parameters.
Get the current eDiscovery Decoder news brief: top stories plus a Week in Review breakdown, returned both as structured data and as display-ready Markdown (formatted_brief) with a 'why it matters' line per story. Use when the user wants a roundup or summary of current eDiscovery AI news rather than a keyword search.
Takes no parameters.
Score a coded sample when you have a full confusion matrix (true/false positives and negatives) — e.g. comparing a TAR model's calls against a reviewer's. Returns recall, precision, F1, accuracy, and in-sample elusion. Use calculate_control_set_recall if you only have relevant-found vs relevant-missed; calculate_elusion for a discard/null-set sample. Aggregate counts only; not legal advice.
Takes no parameters.
Estimate how much responsive/relevant material may remain in a set you chose NOT to review (the discard, null, or 'elusion' set). Use when a random sample of that excluded set has been coded — e.g. 'we sampled 400 culled docs and found 2 relevant.' Returns the elusion rate and a Wilson confidence interval. For an overall recall % from the same sample, use calculate_tar_recall_estimate. Aggregate c
Takes no parameters.
Work out how many documents to randomly sample to estimate a proportion (e.g. richness or elusion) at a target confidence level and margin of error, with finite-population correction. Use when planning a sample before review — 'how big a sample do we need?' Aggregate inputs only; not legal advice.
Takes no parameters.
Estimate overall TAR recall and how many responsive docs were missed, by combining the responsive count already found with an elusion sample of the excluded set. Use when the user wants a recall % for the whole workflow, not just the elusion rate. For only the elusion rate and its interval, use calculate_elusion. Aggregate counts only; not legal advice.
Takes no parameters.
Estimate how rich or prevalent a population is — the share that is responsive/relevant/positive — from positive hits in a random sample, with a Wilson confidence interval. Use for 'what % of this set is relevant?' or to size review scope and cost expectations. Aggregate counts only; not legal advice.
Takes no parameters.
Calculate recall against a known control set: the share of documents already confirmed relevant that the workflow found, with a Wilson confidence interval. Use when you have relevant-found and relevant-missed counts from a fixed reference set. For recall from a confusion matrix use calculate_review_metrics; from a discard-set sample use calculate_tar_recall_estimate. Aggregate counts only; not leg
Takes no parameters.
Compare candidate TAR score or rank cutoffs side by side: for each cutoff, how many docs sit above it, its share of the scored set, and (if responsive counts are given) an estimated precision. Use when deciding where to draw the review/cull line. Aggregate counts only; not legal advice.
Takes no parameters.
QC a TAR validation sampling plan: check whether it has the documented elements needed for a defensibility discussion (population, sample size, confidence level, sampling frame/method, randomization, etc.) and flag what is missing or inconsistent. Use to sanity-check a sampling protocol before relying on it. Reviews metadata only — not a legal sufficiency opinion.
Takes no parameters.
- Every tool, no call limit
- No card, no account needed
- Source published under a licence you can read
- Runs on your machine — nothing of it reaches our gateway
- Nothing to cap, because nothing bills
What counts against your monthly calls
| Tool | Unit | Calls used | Out of the allowance |
|---|
Nothing here is billable. eDiscovery Decoder News/Calc costs nothing to install and nothing to call, at any volume.
Two independent axes, because powerful and malicious are different questions. The grade is threat only. The capability level is blast radius, and it is never a penalty on the grade — it is priced as one subtract-only term in the score, where you can see it.
This listing is a hosted endpoint: the publisher runs it and we connect to it. The scanner reads packages and source, and neither exists to read here, so there is no grade — not a withheld one, an unmeasured one. What can be checked instead is on Installation: what it asks to reach and what it writes.
Release history
Pinned to 0.1.0 — the install command below asks for that release. A pin is part of an install, so it is kept for this visit and written down when you install.
No release note was published with this version.
Only accounts with at least 50 real tool calls against this server in the last 90 days can post. Ratings are weighted by how much the reviewer actually uses it, and publishers can reply once per review.
Writing one takes an account with at least 50 real tool calls against eDiscovery Decoder News/Calc in the last 90 days. That is the whole gate — there is no other way to post, which is why the counts beside each review are worth reading.
Nobody has reviewed this listing. The rating on the card is the mean of the reviews written here and nothing else, so there is no rating until somebody writes the first — which takes an account with 50 real tool calls against it.