A2A Governance Bridge MCP server. Tools: verify agent compliance, authorize a2a transaction, get trust registry. Built by MEOK AI Labs.
List available AI models grouped by thinking level (low/medium/high). Shows default models, credit costs, capabilities for each tier. Use this before consult to understand model options.
ArgumentsA call is made on an account: it counts against an allowance and the publisher sees it, which is why this one asks who you are first.
What it does
Multi-model AI council that debates a question and synthesizes an answer (13 tools incl. review_code, debug_issue).
Quickstart
# 1 — install (mcprush login holds a key from your dashboard)
npx mcprush@latest add roundtable-mcp
# 2 — ask your agent something
> Multi-model AI council that debates a question and synthesizes an answer (13 tools incl. review_code, debug_issue).
Roundtable is free: there is no plan to choose, no cap to set and nothing that can bill you.
Collected from a public index. Nobody has claimed this account, so nothing here was written by its author — claim it if it is yours.
Where are you running it?
Every route below installs the same thing and ends at the same approval screen. Nothing here runs on your machine — this server runs on the publisher’s own infrastructure behind our gateway, and what you install is the connection to it.
This is a public server: you run it yourself and this marketplace is not in the path. Claude Code registers it in one command.
claude mcp add --transport http roundtable-mcp https://mcp.roundtable.now/mcpReconnect, or start a new session, and the tools appear in the model’s tool list.
One config entry pointing at the gateway. The server itself runs on the publisher’s own infrastructure, so nothing from this listing executes on your machine.
13 tools, with what each one reads, writes and reaches shown before you agree — the same list on every route above. Read the tool surface.
Tool surface
What the model actually sees. Descriptions are diffed on every release — see version history.
List available AI models grouped by thinking level (low/medium/high). Shows default models, credit costs, capabilities for each tier. Use this before consult to understand model options.
Takes no parameters.
List your previous MCP tool sessions. Returns session metadata including prompt, tool used, quality score, and credits consumed. Useful for reviewing past council discussions.
Takes no parameters.
Get full details of a previous MCP session by ID. Returns the complete result including participant responses and moderator synthesis. Use list-sessions first to find session IDs.
Takes no parameters.
Query structured logs from your MCP tool executions. Filter by session, severity level, event type, and time range. Useful for debugging and monitoring tool usage.
Takes no parameters.
Check your remaining credits, usage limits, and plan info
Takes no parameters.
Get the dashboard URL for a previous debate session. Returns the thread link and public URL if the thread is public.
Takes no parameters.
Set a thread as public or private. Public threads can be shared via URL. Use session_id from a previous debate session.
Takes no parameters.
Consult the AI coding council — multiple models discuss your engineering question sequentially (each sees prior responses), then a moderator synthesizes. Auto-mode by default — AI picks optimal models, roles, and conversation mode from your prompt. Provide explicit models to override (manual mode). Fully configurable: mode, format, roles, models, thinking level.
Takes no parameters.
Architecture design council. Systems Architect, Infrastructure Engineer, and DX Advocate evaluate your system design. Always uses high thinking for maximum depth. Output as ADR.
Takes no parameters.
Code review council. Senior Engineer, Security Reviewer, and Performance Analyst analyze your code and a moderator synthesizes their findings.
Takes no parameters.
Implementation planning council. Tech Lead, Senior Engineer, and QA Strategist break down a feature into actionable steps, identify risks, and define acceptance criteria. Output as ADR.
Takes no parameters.
Debugging council. Root Cause Analyst, Systems Engineer, and Edge Case Investigator collaboratively diagnose bugs, analyze errors, and propose fixes.
Takes no parameters.
Tradeoff assessment council. Pragmatist, Skeptic, and Futurist evaluate options from different angles — short-term vs long-term, risk vs reward, simplicity vs flexibility. Output as pros-cons.
Takes no parameters.
- Every tool, no call limit
- No card, no account needed
- Source published under a licence you can read
- Runs on your machine — nothing of it reaches our gateway
- Nothing to cap, because nothing bills
What counts against your monthly calls
| Tool | Unit | Calls used | Out of the allowance |
|---|
Nothing here is billable. Roundtable costs nothing to install and nothing to call, at any volume.
Two independent axes, because powerful and malicious are different questions. The grade is threat only. The capability level is blast radius, and it is never a penalty on the grade — it is priced as one subtract-only term in the score, where you can see it.
This listing is a hosted endpoint: the publisher runs it and we connect to it. The scanner reads packages and source, and neither exists to read here, so there is no grade — not a withheld one, an unmeasured one. What can be checked instead is on Installation: what it asks to reach and what it writes.
Release history
Pinned to 1.5.0 — the install command below asks for that release. A pin is part of an install, so it is kept for this visit and written down when you install.
No release note was published with this version.
Only accounts with at least 50 real tool calls against this server in the last 90 days can post. Ratings are weighted by how much the reviewer actually uses it, and publishers can reply once per review.
Writing one takes an account with at least 50 real tool calls against Roundtable in the last 90 days. That is the whole gate — there is no other way to post, which is why the counts beside each review are worth reading.
Nobody has reviewed this listing. The rating on the card is the mean of the reviews written here and nothing else, so there is no rating until somebody writes the first — which takes an account with 50 real tool calls against it.