Hotel booking MCP server — 300K+ properties, real confirmation numbers, loyalty programs. Builders monetize every booking via Stripe
Free
Nothing to run from here
Pediatric Asthma Score is installed from its publisher's own source and answers where it runs, so this marketplace is not in the path of a single call. There is no address here to send one to, and a panel that pretended otherwise would be showing you an answer we made up. Install it and call it from your own client — the Installation tab has the entry for each one.
Open Installation—
p95 latency
—
call success
local
runs on your machine
—
calls last 7d
What it does
儿童哮喘评分（PAS）计算器 - 用于评估2-18岁儿童哮喘严重程度的医疗工具
Quickstart
# 1 — run it from where its publisher ships it
npx -y @medical-mcp/pediatric-asthma-score-mcp-server
# 2 — ask your agent something
> 儿童哮喘评分（PAS）计算器 - 用于评估2-18岁儿童哮喘严重程度的医疗工具
Pediatric Asthma Score is free: there is no plan to choose, no cap to set and nothing that can bill you.
Publishernot claimed
MEAll 4 servers
@medical-mcp4 servers
1 category
Collected from a public index. Nobody has claimed this account, so nothing here was written by its author — claim it if it is yours.
Installation
Where are you running it?
Every route below installs the same thing and ends at the same approval screen. This one runs on your machine: your client starts Pediatric Asthma Score as a process under your own user, with your files and your network, so the tool surface below is what it can do to your computer rather than to a server somewhere else. It is scanned, signed and pinned to the version you choose — read the surface before you approve it.
Claude Codedeclared by this listing
This is a public server: you run it yourself and this marketplace is not in the path. Claude Code registers it in one command.
claude mcp add pediatric-asthma-score-mcp -- npx -y @medical-mcp/pediatric-asthma-score-mcp-serverReconnect, or start a new session, and the tools appear in the model’s tool list.
Free to install, and it runs from its publisher’s own package: no account, no key, no card.
What it writes
One config entry your client uses to start the process locally. A local server runs with your file system and your network, which is why it is priced without metering.
What you approve
15 tools, with what each one reads, writes and reaches shown before you agree — the same list on every route above. Read the tool surface.
Tool surface
What the model actually sees. Descriptions are diffed on every release — see version history.
肾功能计算器MCP Server的路由与解释层，面向中国临床与科研用户
Takes no parameters.
Example callreturns →
临床情境描述（可选）
Takes no parameters.
Example callreturns →
患者基本信息（年龄、性别等）
Takes no parameters.
Example callreturns →
实验室检查值（肌酐、胱抑素C等）
Takes no parameters.
Example callreturns →
计算目的（如给药剂量调整、CKD分期等）
Takes no parameters.
Example callreturns →
计算肾小球滤过率eGFR - 推荐用于中国成人患者的MDRD方程。适用于18岁以上中国人群，使用IDMS标化肌酐值。当需要评估中国成人肾功能时优先选择此工具
Takes no parameters.
Example callreturns →
计算肾小球滤过率eGFR - 湘雅2019方程，最新中国人群验证公式。基于中国多中心研究开发，对中国成人患者准确性最高。推荐作为中国人群的首选eGFR计算方法
Takes no parameters.
Example callreturns →
计算肾小球滤过率eGFR - 国际CKD-EPI 2021方程，去除种族因素的新版本。适用于国际对比研究，但在中国人群可能存在系统性偏高，建议结合中国验证方程使用
Takes no parameters.
Example callreturns →
计算高精度肾小球滤过率eGFR - 肌酐+胱抑素C联合方程。当需要最高精度的肾功能评估时使用，如关键医疗决策、肾移植评估、临床试验等场景。需要同时提供血肌酐和胱抑素C检测值
Takes no parameters.
Example callreturns →
计算药物剂量调整用肌酐清除率 - Cockcroft-Gault公式。专门用于药物剂量调整和药品说明书要求的肌酐清除率计算。当医生需要根据肾功能调整药物剂量时使用此工具
Takes no parameters.
Example callreturns →
计算24小时尿液实测肌酐清除率 - 金标准肾功能测定方法。基于24小时尿液收集和血肌酐测定，提供最准确的肌酐清除率。用于精确评估肾功能、验证估算公式准确性
Takes no parameters.
Example callreturns →
慢性肾脏病CKD分期诊断和风险评估 - 根据eGFR值和蛋白尿水平进行G分期(G1-G5)和A分期(A1-A3)。提供详细的风险分层和临床管理建议。用于CKD诊断、分期和随访管理
Takes no parameters.
Example callreturns →
急性肾损伤AKI诊断和分期 - 基于KDIGO国际标准，通过肌酐变化和尿量监测判断。提供AKI Stage 1-3分期诊断。用于住院患者急性肾损伤的早期识别和严重程度评估
Takes no parameters.
Example callreturns →
计算人体体表面积BSA - 使用Mosteller公式，医学标准方法。基于身高和体重计算体表面积，用于药物剂量计算、eGFR标准化等医学用途。化疗药物剂量计算时必需
Takes no parameters.
Example callreturns →
血清肌酐单位换算工具 - 在μmol/L和mg/dL之间转换。用于处理不同实验室单位的肌酐值，确保计算结果准确性。国际交流和文献对比时必需的单位标准化工具
Takes no parameters.
Example callreturns →
Freeyour plan
$0 forever
- Every tool, no call limit
- No card, no account needed
- Source published under a licence you can read
- Runs on your machine — nothing of it reaches our gateway
- Nothing to cap, because nothing bills
What counts against your monthly calls
| Tool | Unit | Calls used | Out of the allowance |
|---|
Nothing here is billable. Pediatric Asthma Score costs nothing to install and nothing to call, at any volume.
Call allowance · this installenforced at the gateway
Monthly allowance, in calls
—
—
Alert at 80% · then the tool returns a normal MCP error
Used this month: $8.42
$16.58 left
ATrust score 99 / 100
Release 1.0.0 · scanned 25 Aug 2026
Two independent axes, because powerful and malicious are different questions. The grade is threat only. The capability level is blast radius, and it is never a penalty on the grade — it is priced as one subtract-only term in the score, where you can see it.
Threat score100
Client score99
Findings0 threat · 1 capability
Capabilityminimal
Coveragesource
Verificationrepo
Surface digest4661f694c11063962bf13fedaae8824e67b41c0aaeb9f187c9f45207d38f4290
Score vectorthreat 100 → client 99
| Term | Level | What it prices | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
| capability-exposure | minimal | capability blast radius (minimal) — client exposure if the model is manipulated | −0 |
| verification-discount | repo | publisher verification (public source) — no provenance, but the source is public and inspectable | −1 |
| coverage-honesty | source | inspection depth (source) — how much of the target the scan could see | −0 |
score = clamp(round(threatScore − E_cap − E_ver − E_cov), 0, 100). No model, no opinion, no network call at scoring time: the same methodology version against the same bytes always produces this number, and every line above is a field of the report rather than a summary of it.
What the scan could actually read
A grade is only as meaningful as its coverage, so the scanner publishes its own depth before it publishes its result.
Tool surfaceread
Implementation sourceread
Package metadataread
Live transportnot available
Tools were statically extracted from the published source (1 recovered), not enumerated from a running server. Tool-poisoning, Unicode-smuggling, capability and toxic-flow analysis ran on this inferred surface, but a mis-parsed registration could be missed or mis-attributed, so tool-derived findings are capped below “confirmed”. To grade the real runtime surface, scan the running server: --command "npx -y <package>".
Capability — what it could do if the model were manipulated
Tags derived from each tool’s schema and the implementation, not from what the tool calls itself. minimal is the level these add up to.
| Tool | Capability tags | Why the tag was assigned |
|---|---|---|
| calculate_pediatric_asthma_score | no tags |
Toxic-flow graph
The lethal trifecta, checked as a graph rather than as a checklist: untrusted input, a sensitive source and an external sink have to meet before there is a path worth worrying about.
The public result for this release does not print the flow graph, so there is nothing to show here. That is not the same as "no paths were found": what the scan did read is above, under coverage.
Supply chain and provenance
Integrityfirst-seen
Surface digest4661f694c1106396
Scanned2026-08-25
This is the first scan of this surface here, so there is nothing yet to compare it against.
Every result on this tab comes from one deterministic pass over the published package — offline, rule by rule, and auditable line by line above. Same methodology version, same bytes, same score.
Release history
Pinned to 1.0.0 — the install command below asks for that release. A pin is part of an install, so it is kept for this visit and written down when you install.
1.0.0
undated
installedNo release note was published with this version.
—
no reviews yet
Reviews are earned
Only accounts with at least 50 real tool calls against this server in the last 90 days can post. Ratings are weighted by how much the reviewer actually uses it, and publishers can reply once per review.
Reviews are earned
Writing one takes an account with at least 50 real tool calls against Pediatric Asthma Score in the last 90 days. That is the whole gate — there is no other way to post, which is why the counts beside each review are worth reading.
No reviews yet
Nobody has reviewed this listing. The rating on the card is the mean of the reviews written here and nothing else, so there is no rating until somebody writes the first — which takes an account with 50 real tool calls against it.