Model Context Protocol (MCP) server for freee API integration
Draw Schedule: multifamily construction financing is installed from its publisher's own source and answers where it runs, so this marketplace is not in the path of a single call. There is no address here to send one to, and a panel that pretended otherwise would be showing you an answer we made up. Install it and call it from your own client — the Installation tab has the entry for each one.
What it does
Apartment construction loans: HUD vs bank vs fund rules, sizing, Census starts and build times.
Quickstart
# 1 — add it to Claude Code
claude mcp add --scope user --transport http draw-schedule-multifamily-construction-financ-mcp https://multifamilyconstruction.loan/mcp
# 2 — ask your agent for something these tools do
# compare_construction_options, size_construction_loan, get_construction_market and 1 more
Draw Schedule: multifamily construction financing costs nothing on mcprush: there is no plan to choose here, no cap to set and nothing mcprush can bill you for.
Collected from a public index. Nobody has claimed this account, so nothing here was written by its author — claim it if it is yours.
Where are you running it?
Every route below installs the same thing and ends at the same approval screen. Nothing here runs on your machine and nothing runs on ours: this server answers at its publisher’s own address, and what you install is the connection straight to it.
This is a public server: it answers at its publisher’s own address and this marketplace is not in the path. Claude Code registers it in one command; --scope user makes it available in every project. The transport below is http, as the publisher's own manifest declares it.
claude mcp add --scope user --transport http draw-schedule-multifamily-construction-financ-mcp https://multifamilyconstruction.loan/mcpReconnect, or start a new session, and the tools appear in the model’s tool list.
One config entry pointing straight at the publisher’s own address — this marketplace is not in the path, and nothing from this listing executes on your machine.
4 tools, with what each one reads, writes and reaches shown before you agree — the same list on every route above. Read the tool surface.
Tool surface
What the model actually sees. Descriptions are diffed on every release — see version history.
Side-by-side rules for financing apartment construction four ways: HUD 221(d)(4), a bank construction loan, a debt fund and 4% tax credits with bonds. For each: maximum loan size and the rule behind it, rate type, term, coverage test, extra costs and process, with the regulation or HUD letter cited.
| Parameter | Type | Required | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| programs | array | no | Which to include; omit for all four. |
Runs the site's construction loan sizer on your project: the HUD 221(d)(4) loan (lower of 87%/90% of cost and the 1.15/1.11 coverage test, with HUD's construction-interest estimate and upfront MIP), the bank regulatory ceiling (80% of value and 15%-of-value HVCRE equity, plus your bank's loan-to-cost if given) and, if you give its loan-to-cost, a debt fund. Returns loan, binding limit, equity need
| Parameter | Type | Required | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| total_development_cost | number | yes | Total development cost including land, in dollars, e.g. 48000000. |
| as_completed_value | number | yes | Appraised value as completed, in dollars. |
| stabilized_noi | number | yes | Projected stabilized net operating income, dollars per year. |
| construction_months | integer | no | Construction period in months; default is the Census national average for 20+ unit buildings. |
| rents | string | no | market = 87% / 1.15; affordable (or 90%+ assisted) = 90% / 1.11. |
| hud_rate_pct | number | no | HUD note rate in percent; default 5.54 (median note rate on FHA apartment loans endorsed in the year to 2026-09-30). |
| bank_ltc_pct | number | no | Your bank's own loan-to-cost policy, percent. Omit to see only the regulatory ceiling. |
| bank_spread_pct | number | no | Quoted bank spread over SOFR, percent. Needed for the bank interest estimate. |
| fund_ltc_pct | number | no | Quoted debt fund loan-to-cost, percent. Omit to leave the fund out. |
| fund_spread_pct | number | no | Quoted debt fund spread over SOFR, percent. |
Latest U.S. apartment construction numbers for 5+ unit buildings from the Census Bureau (starts, permits, units under construction, completions; seasonally adjusted annual rate, with year-ago and the pipeline peak) and the Federal Reserve's loan officer survey on construction and multifamily lending standards and demand, plus 30-day SOFR. Optional monthly history.
| Parameter | Type | Required | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| history_months | integer | no | Months of history to include for each Census series (0 to 60). The Fed survey history covers the same span by quarter. |
Census Survey of Construction averages for apartment buildings: months from permit to start and from start to completion, by U.S. region and building size (5-9, 10-19 or 20+ units), for one completion year with the ten-year trend, plus what the build length means for HUD upfront MIP and construction interest.
| Parameter | Type | Required | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| region | string | no | Census region; omit for all five rows. |
| building_size | string | no | Units in the building. |
| year | integer | no | Year of completion; default is the latest Census year. |
- Every tool — any call limit is its publisher’s, not ours
- No card, and mcprush charges nothing for it
- Runs at its publisher’s own address — this marketplace is not in the path
- Nothing to cap, because mcprush bills nothing
What counts against your monthly calls
| Tool | Unit | Calls used | Out of the allowance |
|---|
Nothing here is billable: mcprush charges nothing to install Draw Schedule: multifamily construction financing or to call it, at any volume.
Two independent axes, because powerful and malicious are different questions. The grade is threat only. The capability level is blast radius, and it is never a penalty on the grade — it is priced as one subtract-only term in the score, where you can see it.
| Term | Level | What it prices | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
| capability-exposure | minimal | capability blast radius (minimal) — client exposure if the model is manipulated | −0 |
| coverage-honesty | manifest | inspection depth (manifest) — how much of the target the scan could see | −4 |
What the scan could actually read
A grade is only as meaningful as its coverage, so the scanner publishes its own depth before it publishes its result.
The scan read each tool’s name, description, input schema and annotations exactly as the server listed them the last time it answered us; no code was reviewed. We ask the server again about once a month, and a list that changed is graded again.
The implementation source was not read — this reflects the declared tool metadata only.
Capability — what it could do if the model were manipulated
Tags derived from each tool’s schema and the implementation, not from what the tool calls itself. minimal is the level these add up to.
| Tool | Capability tags | Why the tag was assigned |
|---|---|---|
| compare_construction_options | no tags | |
| size_construction_loan | no tags | |
| get_construction_market | no tags | |
| get_build_timeline | no tags |
Toxic-flow graph
The lethal trifecta, checked as a graph rather than as a checklist: untrusted input, a sensitive source and an external sink have to meet before there is a path worth worrying about.
The public result for this release does not print the flow graph, so there is nothing to show here. That is not the same as "no paths were found": what the scan did read is above, under coverage.
Supply chain and provenance
This is the first scan of this surface here, so there is nothing yet to compare it against.
Every result on this tab comes from one deterministic pass over the published package — offline, rule by rule, and auditable line by line above. Same methodology version, same bytes, same score.
Release history
This is an address its publisher runs: which release it serves is theirs to choose, so there is nothing here to pin. The history below is for reading; the current release on file is 1.2026.1101.0.
No release note was published with this version.
One review per account, from a signed-in account that does not publish this listing. Nothing else is asked — you can say what you think before you install it. Publishers can reply once per review, and a review can be edited or deleted by whoever wrote it.
Any signed-in account that does not publish Draw Schedule: multifamily construction financing can review it, once — before installing it or after. A review from an account that has installed it is marked as one.
Nobody has reviewed this listing. The rating on the card is the mean of the reviews written here and nothing else, so there is no rating until somebody writes the first — which takes a signed-in account that does not publish it, and nothing else.