Build abstracts on Amorphous. An abstract can be anything.
nophi.sh is installed from its publisher's own source and answers where it runs, so this marketplace is not in the path of a single call. There is no address here to send one to, and a panel that pretended otherwise would be showing you an answer we made up. Install it and call it from your own client — the Installation tab has the entry for each one.
What it does
Public facts on nophi.sh, phishing-awareness training for French SMBs: catalogue, prices, security.
Quickstart
# 1 — add it to Claude Code
claude mcp add --scope user --transport http nophi-sh-mcp https://app.nophi.sh/mcp
# 2 — ask your agent for something these tools do
# get_overview, list_simulation_templates, get_template_categories and 6 more
nophi.sh costs nothing on mcprush: there is no plan to choose here, no cap to set and nothing mcprush can bill you for.
Collected from a public index. Nobody has claimed this account, so nothing here was written by its author — claim it if it is yours.
Where are you running it?
Every route below installs the same thing and ends at the same approval screen. Nothing here runs on your machine and nothing runs on ours: this server answers at its publisher’s own address, and what you install is the connection straight to it.
This is a public server: it answers at its publisher’s own address and this marketplace is not in the path. Claude Code registers it in one command; --scope user makes it available in every project. The transport below is http, as the publisher's own manifest declares it.
claude mcp add --scope user --transport http nophi-sh-mcp https://app.nophi.sh/mcpReconnect, or start a new session, and the tools appear in the model’s tool list.
One config entry pointing straight at the publisher’s own address — this marketplace is not in the path, and nothing from this listing executes on your machine.
9 tools, with what each one reads, writes and reaches shown before you agree — the same list on every route above. Read the tool surface.
Tool surface
What the model actually sees. Descriptions are diffed on every release — see version history.
Summary of nophi.sh, a phishing-awareness training service for French SMBs: target audience, capabilities, the 5-step workflow, catalogue sizes (simulation templates per language, QR-code templates, courses, course themes), features not included, free trial terms and the free team quiz. Public facts; no account needed.
| Parameter | Type | Required | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| language | string | no | Answer language: 'fr' (French) or 'en' (English). |
E-mail phishing simulation templates in one language: name, category, difficulty, QR-code flag, titles of the red flags employees learn to spot, and the course assigned to repeat clickers. Metadata only (no e-mail bodies, no links). Optional filters: category, difficulty. Paginated: limit (1-100, default 20) and offset; the result includes total and next_offset.
| Parameter | Type | Required | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| language | string | no | Catalogue AND answer language: 'fr' lists the French templates (what French-speaking employees receive), 'en' the English ones. |
| category | no | Category key (as listed by get_template_categories); omitted: all categories. | |
| difficulty | no | Difficulty level; omitted: all levels. | |
| limit | integer | no | Page size (1-100). |
| offset | integer | no | Number of results to skip (next_offset of the previous page). |
Categories of phishing simulation templates: key, label, template counts per language and per difficulty, and the course assigned to repeat clickers; also the total and QR-code template counts. The category keys are the values accepted by the category filter of list_simulation_templates.
| Parameter | Type | Required | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| language | string | no | Answer language: 'fr' (French) or 'en' (English). |
Security-awareness course catalogue grouped by theme (essentials, fraud and money, attack channels, everyday habits, industry): per course the title, description, number of lessons, duration in minutes, quiz questions and passing score; also how courses are assigned after a click, and the practice exercise. Optional filter: theme.
| Parameter | Type | Required | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| language | string | no | Answer language: 'fr' (French) or 'en' (English). |
| theme | no | Course theme; omitted: all themes. |
Plans with their user limits and prices in EUR excluding VAT (monthly, and billed annually), the Enterprise tier (on quote, above the largest plan), and the free trial terms (14 days, no card) with the signup link.
| Parameter | Type | Required | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| language | string | no | Answer language: 'fr' (French) or 'en' (English). |
Security questionnaire answers with their date: hosting (France), backups, subprocessors (name, country, purpose), encryption in transit and at rest, passwords on simulated login pages (not collected), employee data processed, retention periods, exports. Topics outside this list are not covered by this server; the answer includes the contact address for them.
| Parameter | Type | Required | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| language | string | no | Answer language: 'fr' (French) or 'en' (English). |
Mail-system configuration needed for simulation e-mails to reach inboxes, per provider: Microsoft 365 (Advanced Delivery, with the sending IPs and domains), Google Workspace and OVH (guidance on request); plus the option of sending from the company's own domain or mailbox. Optional filter: mail_provider.
| Parameter | Type | Required | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| language | string | no | Answer language: 'fr' (French) or 'en' (English). |
| mail_provider | no | The company's mail system; omitted: all providers. |
Fit check for one company. Inputs, all optional: company size, mail provider, up to 20 needs. Returns the plan for the size (Enterprise on quote above the largest plan), the mail prerequisites for the provider, and a status per need: covered, not_covered (SMS, phone/vishing, attachment and ransomware-encryption simulations, with the related training), see_facts, or unknown
| Parameter | Type | Required | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| language | string | no | Answer language: 'fr' (French) or 'en' (English). |
| company_size | no | Number of users (employees) to train. | |
| mail_provider | no | The company's mail system. | |
| needs | no | Up to 20 needs, as keys (sms_phishing_simulation, phone_vishing_simulation, attachment_simulation, ransomware_simulation, public_api, qr_code_phishing_simulation, data_protection, hosting_in_france, r |
Signup URL of the 14-day free trial (no card) and the steps a person completes: sign up and verify their e-mail address; simulations can only target their own company's e-mail domain. Returns a link only: creates no account and sends no e-mail.
| Parameter | Type | Required | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| language | string | no | Answer language: 'fr' (French) or 'en' (English). |
- Every tool — any call limit is its publisher’s, not ours
- No card, and mcprush charges nothing for it
- Runs at its publisher’s own address — this marketplace is not in the path
- Nothing to cap, because mcprush bills nothing
What counts against your monthly calls
| Tool | Unit | Calls used | Out of the allowance |
|---|
Nothing here is billable: mcprush charges nothing to install nophi.sh or to call it, at any volume.
Two independent axes, because powerful and malicious are different questions. The grade is threat only. The capability level is blast radius, and it is never a penalty on the grade — it is priced as one subtract-only term in the score, where you can see it.
| Term | Level | What it prices | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
| capability-exposure | minimal | capability blast radius (minimal) — client exposure if the model is manipulated | −0 |
| coverage-honesty | manifest | inspection depth (manifest) — how much of the target the scan could see | −4 |
What the scan could actually read
A grade is only as meaningful as its coverage, so the scanner publishes its own depth before it publishes its result.
The scan read each tool’s name, description, input schema and annotations exactly as the server listed them the last time it answered us; no code was reviewed. We ask the server again about once a month, and a list that changed is graded again.
The implementation source was not read — this reflects the declared tool metadata only.
Capability — what it could do if the model were manipulated
Tags derived from each tool’s schema and the implementation, not from what the tool calls itself. minimal is the level these add up to.
| Tool | Capability tags | Why the tag was assigned |
|---|---|---|
| get_overview | no tags | |
| list_simulation_templates | no tags | |
| get_template_categories | no tags | |
| list_courses | no tags | |
| get_pricing | no tags | |
| get_security_and_data | no tags | |
| get_deliverability_prerequisites | no tags | |
| compare_fit | no tags | |
| start_trial_link | no tags |
Toxic-flow graph
The lethal trifecta, checked as a graph rather than as a checklist: untrusted input, a sensitive source and an external sink have to meet before there is a path worth worrying about.
The public result for this release does not print the flow graph, so there is nothing to show here. That is not the same as "no paths were found": what the scan did read is above, under coverage.
Supply chain and provenance
This is the first scan of this surface here, so there is nothing yet to compare it against.
Every result on this tab comes from one deterministic pass over the published package — offline, rule by rule, and auditable line by line above. Same methodology version, same bytes, same score.
Release history
This is an address its publisher runs: which release it serves is theirs to choose, so there is nothing here to pin. The history below is for reading; the current release on file is 1.0.1.
No release note was published with this version.
One review per account, from a signed-in account that does not publish this listing. Nothing else is asked — you can say what you think before you install it. Publishers can reply once per review, and a review can be edited or deleted by whoever wrote it.
Any signed-in account that does not publish nophi.sh can review it, once — before installing it or after. A review from an account that has installed it is marked as one.
Nobody has reviewed this listing. The rating on the card is the mean of the reviews written here and nothing else, so there is no rating until somebody writes the first — which takes a signed-in account that does not publish it, and nothing else.