Comprehensive Model Context Protocol server for managing Home Assistant through AI assistants.
One1 Trademark Risk Check is installed from its publisher's own source and answers where it runs, so this marketplace is not in the path of a single call. There is no address here to send one to, and a panel that pretended otherwise would be showing you an answer we made up. Install it and call it from your own client — the Installation tab has the entry for each one.
What it does
Trademark conflict, logo look-alike and TRO enforcer checks for cross-border sellers.
Quickstart
# 1 — add it to Claude Code
claude mcp add --scope user --transport http one1-trademark-risk-check-mcp https://one1.cn/mcp
# 2 — ask your agent for something these tools do
# trademark_text_search, listing_scan, trademark_lookup_by_serial and 4 more
One1 Trademark Risk Check costs nothing on mcprush: there is no plan to choose here, no cap to set and nothing mcprush can bill you for.
Collected from a public index. Nobody has claimed this account, so nothing here was written by its author — claim it if it is yours.
Where are you running it?
Every route below installs the same thing and ends at the same approval screen. Nothing here runs on your machine and nothing runs on ours: this server answers at its publisher’s own address, and what you install is the connection straight to it.
This is a public server: it answers at its publisher’s own address and this marketplace is not in the path. Claude Code registers it in one command; --scope user makes it available in every project. The transport below is http, as the publisher's own manifest declares it.
claude mcp add --scope user --transport http one1-trademark-risk-check-mcp https://one1.cn/mcpReconnect, or start a new session, and the tools appear in the model’s tool list.
One config entry pointing straight at the publisher’s own address — this marketplace is not in the path, and nothing from this listing executes on your machine.
7 tools, with what each one reads, writes and reaches shown before you agree — the same list on every route above. Read the tool surface.
Tool surface
What the model actually sees. Descriptions are diffed on every release — see version history.
搜索与某个品牌名/商标词在美国注册商标库中冲突的商标(音/形/义近似检测)。 用于卖家给产品起品牌名前,查是否与已注册商标冲突。 query: 要核查的品牌名或商标词,例如 "Nike"。 nice_class: 尼斯商品类别号(如 "025"=服装鞋帽),可选;提供则按同类目重排风险等级。 live_only: 仅返回有效(Live)注册,默认 False。 limit: 返回条数,默认 10。 ⚠️ 判读规则(重要):count 是返回的最近邻条数,恒等于 limit,不是冲突数—— 即使该词完全无人注册,count 仍为 10。判断有无冲突请看 has_conflicts / conflict_count(= 风险等级为「高」的条数)。 ⚠️ `coverage.clearance_
No parameter schema on file.
扫描一段商品 listing 标题/文案,找出其中撞美国注册商标的词/词组并按风险分组。 用于卖家发品前一键自查整条 listing 标题是否含侵权商标词。 text: listing 标题或文案(可整段)。 nice_class: 尼斯商品类别号,可选。 返回: {summary:{高,中,低}, tro_count, hits:[{mark, risk_level, applicant, tro_alert?}]}。
No parameter schema on file.
按美国商标号(serial number)精确查该商标的详情与风险。 用于已知商标号(如收到侵权通知里的号)时直接查该标。走 idx_serial 索引,亚毫秒。 serial: USPTO 商标序列号,如 "78414956"。 返回: {serial, found, result:{mark, legal_status, applicant, risk_level, ...}}。
No parameter schema on file.
按权利人/申请人(applicant)查其名下的美国商标。 用于做竞品权利人画像、查某公司商标布局、识别高频维权方。 owner: 权利人/公司名,如 "Nike, Inc."。 live_only: 仅 Live,默认 False。limit: 默认 20。 返回: {owner, count, results:[{mark, nice_class, legal_status, risk_level, tro_alert?}]}。
No parameter schema on file.
以图搜图:上传 Logo / 图形商标 / 产品主图的公网 URL,找视觉相似的美国图形商标。 用于卖家查自家 Logo/图案是否撞已注册图形商标(CLIP 视觉相似 + 名录加权)。 image_url: 公网可访问的图片 URL(PNG/JPG)。 nice_class: 尼斯类别,可选。limit: 默认 10。 返回: {count, results:[{mark, visual_similarity, risk_level, applicant, legal_status}]}。
No parameter schema on file.
权利人/品牌的「维权方画像」:聚合其在美国的商标组合 + 是否为 TRO/Schedule A 高频维权方。 用于卖家评估某品牌是否激进维权(批量起诉 Schedule A + 临时禁令 TRO 常冻结账户)、是否应高度规避。 owner: 权利人或品牌名,如 "Nike" 或 "YETI"。 返回: {owner, is_enforcer, enforcement{level,note,src}, total_marks, live_marks, top_classes[{nice,count}], tro_marks[], sample_marks[], risk_hint}。 is_enforcer=true 表示命中维权种子库,强烈建议规避;结果仅供参考,不构成法律意见。
No parameter schema on file.
查 One1 各辖区的数据覆盖度:文本行数、数据截止日期、覆盖档(full/partial/thin/very-thin)、是否可作核名结论、图形库是否可搜、套餐门槛。 调其它工具前先看目标辖区能不能作结论:scope≠full 或 data_as_of 过旧(如 UK 2018-02、EU 2019-12、US 2025-02)的辖区,「无匹配」不代表可注册。 country: ISO 2 位国码(US/CN/KR/BR/…);留空返回全部辖区摘要。
No parameter schema on file.
- Every tool — any call limit is its publisher’s, not ours
- No card, and mcprush charges nothing for it
- Runs at its publisher’s own address — this marketplace is not in the path
- Nothing to cap, because mcprush bills nothing
What counts against your monthly calls
| Tool | Unit | Calls used | Out of the allowance |
|---|
Nothing here is billable: mcprush charges nothing to install One1 Trademark Risk Check or to call it, at any volume.
Two independent axes, because powerful and malicious are different questions. The grade is threat only. The capability level is blast radius, and it is never a penalty on the grade — it is priced as one subtract-only term in the score, where you can see it.
This listing is an address its publisher runs, and you connect to it directly — this marketplace is not in the path. The scanner reads packages and public source, and an address is neither: the repository linked on this page is where this record was collected from, not a copy of what the address serves, so it is not graded in its place. So there is no grade — not a withheld one, an unmeasured one.
Release history
This is an address its publisher runs: which release it serves is theirs to choose, so there is nothing here to pin. The history below is for reading; the current release on file is 1.0.1.
No release note was published with this version.
One review per account, from a signed-in account that does not publish this listing. Nothing else is asked — you can say what you think before you install it. Publishers can reply once per review, and a review can be edited or deleted by whoever wrote it.
Any signed-in account that does not publish One1 Trademark Risk Check can review it, once — before installing it or after. A review from an account that has installed it is marked as one.
Nobody has reviewed this listing. The rating on the card is the mean of the reviews written here and nothing else, so there is no rating until somebody writes the first — which takes a signed-in account that does not publish it, and nothing else.