Chroma’s official MCP server: vector search and collection management for RAG workflows.
Arquestra Audit is installed from its publisher's own source and answers where it runs, so this marketplace is not in the path of a single call. There is no address here to send one to, and a panel that pretended otherwise would be showing you an answer we made up. Install it and call it from your own client — the Installation tab has the entry for each one.
What it does
Audit a data file before publishing: one light per figure. Your data never reaches the server.
Quickstart
# 1 — add it to Claude Code
claude mcp add --scope user --transport http arquestra-audit-mcp https://arquestra.dev/api/mcp/audit
# 2 — ask your agent for something these tools do
# start_audit, measure_in_app, prepare_script and 2 more
Arquestra Audit costs nothing on mcprush: there is no plan to choose here, no cap to set and nothing mcprush can bill you for.
Collected from a public index. Nobody has claimed this account, so nothing here was written by its author — claim it if it is yours.
Where are you running it?
Every route below installs the same thing and ends at the same approval screen. Nothing here runs on your machine and nothing runs on ours: this server answers at its publisher’s own address, and what you install is the connection straight to it.
This is a public server: it answers at its publisher’s own address and this marketplace is not in the path. Claude Code registers it in one command; --scope user makes it available in every project. The transport below is http, as the publisher's own manifest declares it.
claude mcp add --scope user --transport http arquestra-audit-mcp https://arquestra.dev/api/mcp/auditReconnect, or start a new session, and the tools appear in the model’s tool list.
One config entry pointing straight at the publisher’s own address — this marketplace is not in the path, and nothing from this listing executes on your machine.
5 tools, with what each one reads, writes and reaches shown before you agree — the same list on every route above. Read the tool surface.
Tool surface
What the model actually sees. Descriptions are diffed on every release — see version history.
Proposes how to read a data file for an audit, from its column names (optionally a type and one example value each) and the results the person wants to publish. Returns a proposed spec (the role of each column, each result written as a claim), how claims are written, the catalog of checks and the points the person has to confirm. It receives no rows.
| Parameter | Type | Required | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| columns | array | yes | — |
| dataset_name | string | no | — |
| figures | array | no | The results the person wants to publish, in their words, e.g. 'share of projects per sector'. |
Opens the audit panel in the chat. Without a spec, the panel receives the person's file, reads it in their browser and returns a profile of it: per column its kind, empty cells, distinct values, the values of categories with their counts, the range of numbers and dates, and the first rows. With a confirmed spec, the panel measures that same file in the browser with measure.py and shows one light p
| Parameter | Type | Required | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| spec | object | no | The spec from start_audit, as confirmed by the person. Leave it out to open the panel first, to receive the file. |
| columns | array | no | Optional: the column names of the file, to check the spec refers to real columns. |
Returns measure.py with a confirmed spec written in: a fixed Python script (standard library, no network, fixed seeds) that counts what each check needs from a data file and prints those counts with its own fingerprint and no rows. Reads .csv or .json. If the spec has errors, returns the errors instead.
| Parameter | Type | Required | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| spec | object | yes | The spec from start_audit, as confirmed by the person. |
| columns | array | no | Optional: the column names of the file, to check the spec refers to real columns. |
Turns the output of measure.py into one light per result (red, amber or green, with its reasons), after checking that the output comes from the unchanged script and from the given spec. Shows the lights in the chat and returns them, with a link to the same view on arquestra.dev that carries only codes. Stores nothing.
| Parameter | Type | Required | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| spec | object | yes | The same spec sent to prepare_script. |
| output | string | yes | Everything measure.py printed: the fingerprint line and the measures line. |
Published example audits, such as the AI Project Radar, and how the audit works. With no arguments: the overview and the list of examples. With a name: one example, result by result (level filters by light). With a name and an id: one result with every reason and what to change. They are not the person's data.
| Parameter | Type | Required | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| name | string | no | Example name from the list, e.g. 'radar'. |
| id | string | no | Figure id inside that example. |
| level | string | no | Only figures with this light. |
| lang | string | no | Language of the texts. Default en. |
- Every tool — any call limit is its publisher’s, not ours
- No card, and mcprush charges nothing for it
- Runs at its publisher’s own address — this marketplace is not in the path
- Nothing to cap, because mcprush bills nothing
What counts against your monthly calls
| Tool | Unit | Calls used | Out of the allowance |
|---|
Nothing here is billable: mcprush charges nothing to install Arquestra Audit or to call it, at any volume.
Two independent axes, because powerful and malicious are different questions. The grade is threat only. The capability level is blast radius, and it is never a penalty on the grade — it is priced as one subtract-only term in the score, where you can see it.
| Term | Level | What it prices | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
| capability-exposure | minimal | capability blast radius (minimal) — client exposure if the model is manipulated | −0 |
| coverage-honesty | manifest | inspection depth (manifest) — how much of the target the scan could see | −4 |
What the scan could actually read
A grade is only as meaningful as its coverage, so the scanner publishes its own depth before it publishes its result.
The scan read each tool’s name, description, input schema and annotations exactly as the server listed them the last time it answered us; no code was reviewed. We ask the server again about once a month, and a list that changed is graded again.
The implementation source was not read — this reflects the declared tool metadata only.
Capability — what it could do if the model were manipulated
Tags derived from each tool’s schema and the implementation, not from what the tool calls itself. minimal is the level these add up to.
| Tool | Capability tags | Why the tag was assigned |
|---|---|---|
| start_audit | no tags | |
| measure_in_app | no tags | |
| prepare_script | no tags | |
| show_audit | no tags | |
| example_audits | no tags |
Toxic-flow graph
The lethal trifecta, checked as a graph rather than as a checklist: untrusted input, a sensitive source and an external sink have to meet before there is a path worth worrying about.
The public result for this release does not print the flow graph, so there is nothing to show here. That is not the same as "no paths were found": what the scan did read is above, under coverage.
Supply chain and provenance
This is the first scan of this surface here, so there is nothing yet to compare it against.
Every result on this tab comes from one deterministic pass over the published package — offline, rule by rule, and auditable line by line above. Same methodology version, same bytes, same score.
Release history
This is an address its publisher runs: which release it serves is theirs to choose, so there is nothing here to pin. The history below is for reading; the current release on file is 0.8.1.
No release note was published with this version.
One review per account, from a signed-in account that does not publish this listing. Nothing else is asked — you can say what you think before you install it. Publishers can reply once per review, and a review can be edited or deleted by whoever wrote it.
Any signed-in account that does not publish Arquestra Audit can review it, once — before installing it or after. A review from an account that has installed it is marked as one.
Nobody has reviewed this listing. The rating on the card is the mean of the reviews written here and nothing else, so there is no rating until somebody writes the first — which takes a signed-in account that does not publish it, and nothing else.