Model Context Protocol (MCP) server for freee API integration
Nothing to run from here
Points or Cash is installed from its publisher's own source and answers where it runs, so this marketplace is not in the path of a single call. There is no address here to send one to, and a panel that pretended otherwise would be showing you an answer we made up. Install it and call it from your own client — the Installation tab has the entry for each one.
96/100
tool-list score
5
tools declared
remote
at its publisher
—
calls last 7d
What it does
Use points or pay cash? Cents-per-point verdicts, transfer partners, award prices, lounges.
Quickstart
# 1 — add it to Claude Code
claude mcp add --scope user --transport http points-or-cash-mcp https://pointsorcash.app/mcp
# 2 — ask your agent for something these tools do
# transfer_options, award_chart, points_value and 2 more
Points or Cash costs nothing on mcprush: there is no plan to choose here, no cap to set and nothing mcprush can bill you for.
Publishernot claimed
POAll 1 server
pointsorcash1 server
1 category
Collected from a public index. Nobody has claimed this account, so nothing here was written by its author — claim it if it is yours.
Installation
Where are you running it?
Every route below installs the same thing and ends at the same approval screen. Nothing here runs on your machine and nothing runs on ours: this server answers at its publisher’s own address, and what you install is the connection straight to it.
Claude Codedeclared by this listing
This is a public server: it answers at its publisher’s own address and this marketplace is not in the path. Claude Code registers it in one command; --scope user makes it available in every project. The transport below is http, as the publisher's own manifest declares it.
claude mcp add --scope user --transport http points-or-cash-mcp https://pointsorcash.app/mcpReconnect, or start a new session, and the tools appear in the model’s tool list.
Free on mcprush, and it answers at its publisher’s own address: this marketplace is not in the path, so there is no key of ours to hold and no card to add.
What it writes
One config entry pointing straight at the publisher’s own address — this marketplace is not in the path, and nothing from this listing executes on your machine.
What you approve
5 tools, with what each one reads, writes and reaches shown before you agree — the same list on every route above. Read the tool surface.
Tool surface
What the model actually sees. Descriptions are diffed on every release — see version history.
Which of the traveler's bank points can become miles/points in a target loyalty program, at what ratio, and how many they would end up with. Based on a researched transfer-partner table (has an as_of date; ratios change and transfer bonuses are not included). Pass the traveler's balances.
| Parameter | Type | Required | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| target_programs | array | yes | Program slugs, e.g. ["aeroplan","flyingblue","virginatlantic","ana","hyatt"]. Empty array = list every partner reachable from the balances. |
| balances | array | yes | The traveler's bank point balances, e.g. [{"bank":"amex_mr","points":250000}]. amex_mr means a US-issued Amex; for an Amex issued elsewhere use the country key (amex_mr_be/_nl/_uk/_fr/_de/_es/_it/_se/ |
| miles_needed | yes | Miles the award costs, to check whether the balances cover it; null if unknown |
Typical saver award prices (one-way) by program, market and cabin from a researched table, plus known sweet spots. Use when live award search is unavailable, to shortlist programs, or to judge whether a live price is good. Prices are estimates with an as_of date; dynamic programs vary.
| Parameter | Type | Required | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| market | string | yes | us_ = from the US, eu_ = from Europe. *_north_asia = Japan/Korea/China/HK/Taiwan; eu_middle_east includes North and Central Africa; eu_africa = southern Africa |
| cabin | string | yes | — |
| programs | array | yes | Program slugs to look up; empty array = all programs with a price for this market |
Exact cents-per-point for an award vs the cash fare, in the trip currency: (cash − award fees − what paying cash would earn) ÷ points × 100. When the award is paid by transferring bank points, pass bank + program: it applies the traveler's transfer ratio (e.g. Belgian Amex to Flying Blue is 2:1) and any active bonus, and judges the value per bank point spent. Call it for every award you compare, r
| Parameter | Type | Required | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| currency | string | yes | Currency of all prices, e.g. "EUR", "USD", "GBP". Cash fare and award fees must be in the same currency; convert first if they differ. |
| options | array | yes | — |
| cash_back_pct | yes | Cash/crypto back % the traveler would earn paying cash (e.g. 4 for a 4% card). Null if unknown. | |
| points_per_unit_paying_cash | yes | Card points earned per dollar/euro on the cash fare (e.g. 5 for Amex Platinum on flights). Null if unknown. |
Earn rates for crypto-cashback and flat-cashback cards (Coinbase One Card, Gemini, Crypto.com, Fold, Robinhood Gold, Citi Double Cash, Wells Fargo Active Cash and more): rate on airfare, hotels, travel portals and everything else, fees, caps and how rewards pay out. Use when the traveler pays cash with one of these cards, to value the cash option (cash back earned) and to pass cash_back_pct to poi
| Parameter | Type | Required | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| cards | array | yes | Card slugs or names, e.g. ["coinbase_one_card"]; empty array = all cards |
Airport lounges for a journey: the lounges at each airport (origin, connections, destination) and which ones the traveler can use with their cards, plus access rules by ticket and status (business class, oneworld/Star Alliance/SkyTeam elite). Covers 214 airports, including Brussels and the main European and Asian hubs, with access by ticket, status, Priority Pass and cards by issuing country. Use
| Parameter | Type | Required | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| airports | array | yes | IATA codes in travel order, e.g. ["SFO","SEA","HND"] |
| cards | array | yes | Lounge-relevant cards the traveler holds, as slugs. US-issued: amex_platinum, amex_business_platinum, amex_centurion_card, chase_sapphire_reserve, capital_one_venture_x, citi_strata_elite, citi_aadvan |
Free
$0 forever
- Every tool — any call limit is its publisher’s, not ours
- No card, and mcprush charges nothing for it
- Runs at its publisher’s own address — this marketplace is not in the path
- Nothing to cap, because mcprush bills nothing
What counts against your monthly calls
| Tool | Unit | Calls used | Out of the allowance |
|---|
Nothing here is billable: mcprush charges nothing to install Points or Cash or to call it, at any volume.
Call allowance · this installenforced at the gateway
Monthly allowance, in calls
—
—
Alert at 80% · then the tool returns a normal MCP error
Used this month: —
ATool-list grade · score 96 / 100
Release 1.1.0 · scanned 4 Nov 2026
Graded from the tools this server lists, not from its source code.
Two independent axes, because powerful and malicious are different questions. The grade is threat only. The capability level is blast radius, and it is never a penalty on the grade — it is priced as one subtract-only term in the score, where you can see it.
Threat score100
Client score96
Findings0 threat · 0 capability
Capabilityminimal
Coveragemanifest
Verificationnot in this report
Surface digest2806080d5a5da8950e7cc3e5bece93fcf97f6bed9713bf1d20ad3d9965460add
Score vectorthreat 100 → client 96
| Term | Level | What it prices | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
| capability-exposure | minimal | capability blast radius (minimal) — client exposure if the model is manipulated | −0 |
| coverage-honesty | manifest | inspection depth (manifest) — how much of the target the scan could see | −4 |
score = clamp(round(threatScore − E_cap − E_ver − E_cov), 0, 100). No model, no opinion, no network call at scoring time: the same methodology version against the same bytes always produces this number, and every line above is a field of the report rather than a summary of it.
What the scan could actually read
A grade is only as meaningful as its coverage, so the scanner publishes its own depth before it publishes its result.
The scan read each tool’s name, description, input schema and annotations exactly as the server listed them the last time it answered us; no code was reviewed. We ask the server again about once a month, and a list that changed is graded again.
Tool surfaceread
Implementation sourcenot available
Package metadatanot available
Live transportnot available
The implementation source was not read — this reflects the declared tool metadata only.
Capability — what it could do if the model were manipulated
Tags derived from each tool’s schema and the implementation, not from what the tool calls itself. minimal is the level these add up to.
| Tool | Capability tags | Why the tag was assigned |
|---|---|---|
| transfer_options | no tags | |
| award_chart | no tags | |
| points_value | no tags | |
| cashback_cards | no tags | |
| lounges | no tags |
Toxic-flow graph
The lethal trifecta, checked as a graph rather than as a checklist: untrusted input, a sensitive source and an external sink have to meet before there is a path worth worrying about.
The public result for this release does not print the flow graph, so there is nothing to show here. That is not the same as "no paths were found": what the scan did read is above, under coverage.
Supply chain and provenance
Integrityfirst-seen
Surface digest2806080d5a5da895
Scanned2026-11-04
This is the first scan of this surface here, so there is nothing yet to compare it against.
Every result on this tab comes from one deterministic pass over the published package — offline, rule by rule, and auditable line by line above. Same methodology version, same bytes, same score.
Release history
This is an address its publisher runs: which release it serves is theirs to choose, so there is nothing here to pin. The history below is for reading; the current release on file is 1.1.0.
1.1.0
undated
latestNo release note was published with this version.
—
no reviews yet
Who can review
One review per account, from a signed-in account that does not publish this listing. Nothing else is asked — you can say what you think before you install it. Publishers can reply once per review, and a review can be edited or deleted by whoever wrote it.
Sign in to write one
Any signed-in account that does not publish Points or Cash can review it, once — before installing it or after. A review from an account that has installed it is marked as one.
No reviews yet
Nobody has reviewed this listing. The rating on the card is the mean of the reviews written here and nothing else, so there is no rating until somebody writes the first — which takes a signed-in account that does not publish it, and nothing else.