MCP server for dossier automation standard - enables LLMs to discover, verify, and execute dossiers
Llmledger is installed from its publisher's own source and answers where it runs, so this marketplace is not in the path of a single call. There is no address here to send one to, and a panel that pretended otherwise would be showing you an answer we made up. Install it and call it from your own client — the Installation tab has the entry for each one.
What it does
Which AI model, and what it costs: LiteLLM prices, Arena ratings and price history.
Quickstart
# 1 — add it to Claude Code
claude mcp add --scope user llmledger-mcp '--' uvx llmledger-mcp
# 2 — ask your agent for something these tools do
# find_models, compare_models, estimate_cost and 2 more
Llmledger costs nothing on mcprush: there is no plan to choose here, no cap to set and nothing mcprush can bill you for.
Collected from a public index. Nobody has claimed this account, so nothing here was written by its author — claim it if it is yours.
Where are you running it?
Every route below installs the same thing and ends at the same approval screen. This one runs on your machine: your client starts Llmledger as a process under your own user, with your files and your network, so the tool surface below is what it can do to your computer rather than to a server somewhere else. Its scan result is on the Security tab — read the surface before you approve it.
This is a public server: you run it yourself and this marketplace is not in the path. You need uv (docs.astral.sh/uv): uvx comes with it. Claude Code registers it in one command; --scope user makes it available in every project. The '--' is in quotes so that PowerShell passes it on.
claude mcp add --scope user llmledger-mcp '--' uvx llmledger-mcpReconnect, or start a new session, and the tools appear in the model’s tool list.
One config entry your client uses to start the process locally. A local server runs with your file system and your network, which is why it is priced without metering.
5 tools, with what each one reads, writes and reaches shown before you agree — the same list on every route above. Read the tool surface.
Tool surface
What the model actually sees. Descriptions are diffed on every release — see version history.
The highest rated models for a kind of work that meet the limits, each at its cheapest listing, with prices per 1M tokens, Arena rating and prompt size. Unrated models follow, cheapest first.
| Parameter | Type | Required | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| task | no | The kind of work, as Arena rates it | |
| max_output_price | number | no | Highest answer price, dollars per 1M tokens |
| min_context | integer | no | Smallest prompt size the model must take, in tokens |
| needs | array | no | What the model must be able to do |
| maker | string | no | Only this maker, for example anthropic or openai |
| limit | integer | no | — |
Two to six models side by side for a kind of work: rating, prices, cost per task (or plan use), and which to pick, with the break-even share of answer tokens for each against the pick.
| Parameter | Type | Required | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| models | array | yes | 2 to 6 model names, for example claude-opus-5.5, gpt-6.1-sol |
| task | no | The kind of work, as Arena rates it | |
| input_tokens | integer | no | Prompt tokens per task |
| output_tokens | integer | no | Answer tokens per task, including hidden thinking |
| answer_tokens | object | no | Answer tokens per model when they differ, by the names given |
| pay | no | api: dollars; claude or chatgpt: how fast each uses that plan |
What a workload costs on each model at its cheapest listing: per call, per day and per 30 days.
| Parameter | Type | Required | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| models | array | yes | 1 to 10 model names |
| input_tokens | integer | yes | Prompt tokens per call |
| output_tokens | integer | yes | Answer tokens per call, including hidden thinking |
| cached_tokens | integer | no | How many of the prompt tokens are read from the cache |
| calls_per_day | number | no | Calls per day |
Every change to a model's listings since 2023 (prices, retirement dates), and for listings that have not changed yet, the chance of a price change, a retirement date or removal in the next 90 days and year.
| Parameter | Type | Required | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| model | string | yes | A model name, for example claude-opus-5.5, or one listing such as bedrock/anthropic.claude-opus-5-5 |
Reads a prompt, guesses its kind of work, and suggests a model and effort level: the best value (the cheapest whose rating the votes cannot tell apart from the top), the top rated and the cheapest rated.
| Parameter | Type | Required | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| prompt | string | yes | The project's starting prompt, or a description of the work |
| pay | no | api: dollars; claude or chatgpt: compare within that plan | |
| answer | string | no | Typical answer length |
- Every tool, no call limit
- No card, and mcprush charges nothing for it
- Source published under MIT
- Runs on your machine — nothing of it reaches our gateway
- Nothing to cap, because mcprush bills nothing
What counts against your monthly calls
| Tool | Unit | Calls used | Out of the allowance |
|---|
Nothing here is billable: mcprush charges nothing to install Llmledger or to call it, at any volume.
Two independent axes, because powerful and malicious are different questions. The grade is threat only. The capability level is blast radius, and it is never a penalty on the grade — it is priced as one subtract-only term in the score, where you can see it.
| Term | Level | What it prices | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
| capability-exposure | minimal | capability blast radius (minimal) — client exposure if the model is manipulated | −0 |
| verification-discount | source | publisher verification (provenance) — cryptographic build provenance ties the artifact to its source | −0 |
| coverage-honesty | source | inspection depth (source) — how much of the target the scan could see | −0 |
What the scan could actually read
A grade is only as meaningful as its coverage, so the scanner publishes its own depth before it publishes its result.
Tools were statically extracted from the published source (5 recovered), not enumerated from a running server. Tool-poisoning, Unicode-smuggling, capability and toxic-flow analysis ran on this inferred surface, but a mis-parsed registration could be missed or mis-attributed, so tool-derived findings are capped below “confirmed”. To grade the real runtime surface, scan the running server: --command "npx -y <package>".
Capability — what it could do if the model were manipulated
Tags derived from each tool’s schema and the implementation, not from what the tool calls itself. minimal is the level these add up to.
| Tool | Capability tags | Why the tag was assigned |
|---|---|---|
| find_models | no tags | |
| compare_models | no tags | |
| estimate_cost | no tags | |
| price_history | no tags | |
| suggest_for_project | no tags |
Toxic-flow graph
The lethal trifecta, checked as a graph rather than as a checklist: untrusted input, a sensitive source and an external sink have to meet before there is a path worth worrying about.
The public result for this release does not print the flow graph, so there is nothing to show here. That is not the same as "no paths were found": what the scan did read is above, under coverage.
Supply chain and provenance
This is the first scan of this surface here, so there is nothing yet to compare it against.
Every result on this tab comes from one deterministic pass over the published package — offline, rule by rule, and auditable line by line above. Same methodology version, same bytes, same score.
Release history
Always latest — the install command names no version, so it installs the newest release when it runs; the current release on file is 0.1.2. Pin a release below and the command asks for exactly that one.
No release note was published with this version.
- The version this listing was on when mcprush began following its releases. The registry was not asked when it shipped, so this row carries no date.
One review per account, from a signed-in account that does not publish this listing. Nothing else is asked — you can say what you think before you install it. Publishers can reply once per review, and a review can be edited or deleted by whoever wrote it.
Any signed-in account that does not publish Llmledger can review it, once — before installing it or after. A review from an account that has installed it is marked as one.
Nobody has reviewed this listing. The rating on the card is the mean of the reviews written here and nothing else, so there is no rating until somebody writes the first — which takes a signed-in account that does not publish it, and nothing else.