Model Context Protocol (MCP) server for Apollo.io API integration
Nothing to run from here
Pyxmark is installed from its publisher's own source and answers where it runs, so this marketplace is not in the path of a single call. There is no address here to send one to, and a panel that pretended otherwise would be showing you an answer we made up. Install it and call it from your own client — the Installation tab has the entry for each one.
96/100
tool-list score
6
tools declared
remote
at its publisher
—
calls last 7d
What it does
Vendor checks: sanctions lists, SEC filings, domain age and a due-diligence report with sources.
Quickstart
# 1 — add it to Claude Code
claude mcp add --scope user --transport http pyxmark-mcp https://mcp.pyxmark.com/mcp
# 2 — ask your agent for something these tools do
# search_company, company_profile, screen_sanctions and 3 more
Pyxmark costs nothing on mcprush: there is no plan to choose here, no cap to set and nothing mcprush can bill you for.
Publisher
Installation
Where are you running it?
Every route below installs the same thing and ends at the same approval screen. Nothing here runs on your machine and nothing runs on ours: this server answers at its publisher’s own address, and what you install is the connection straight to it.
Claude Codedeclared by this listing
This is a public server: it answers at its publisher’s own address and this marketplace is not in the path. Claude Code registers it in one command; --scope user makes it available in every project. The transport below is http, as the publisher's own manifest declares it.
claude mcp add --scope user --transport http pyxmark-mcp https://mcp.pyxmark.com/mcpReconnect, or start a new session, and the tools appear in the model’s tool list.
Free on mcprush, and it answers at its publisher’s own address: this marketplace is not in the path, so there is no key of ours to hold and no card to add.
What it writes
One config entry pointing straight at the publisher’s own address — this marketplace is not in the path, and nothing from this listing executes on your machine.
What you approve
6 tools, with what each one reads, writes and reaches shown before you agree — the same list on every route above. Read the tool surface.
Tool surface
What the model actually sees. Descriptions are diffed on every release — see version history.
Look up which SEC-registered company a name, ticker or CIK refers to. Returns up to 10 candidates, each with its CIK, tickers and a match score, and nothing else. Use it to pick the right CIK when a name is ambiguous, then call company_profile with that CIK for the details.
| Parameter | Type | Required | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| query | string | yes | Company name, ticker, or CIK |
Full SEC EDGAR record for one company, given its CIK, ticker or name (best match): legal name, industry (SIC), state of incorporation, business address, 3 fiscal years of revenue, net income, total assets and cash, and its recent 10-K, 10-Q and 8-K filings with links. Use search_company first if you only have a partial or ambiguous name.
| Parameter | Type | Required | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| cik | string | no | SEC CIK number |
| ticker | string | no | Stock ticker |
| name | string | no | Company name (fuzzy) |
Fuzzy-screen a person or organisation name against OFAC SDN + Consolidated, UN, EU, and UK sanctions lists. Returns up to 15 scored matches with source links; if more match, the summary says so and suggests a more specific query. Optional dob/birth_year, nationality and country set aside same-name matches whose listed details differ (rules at https://mcp.pyxmark.com/#details). Optional address, em
| Parameter | Type | Required | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| name | string | yes | Person or organisation name |
| threshold | number | no | Minimum match score 0-1 (default 0.88) |
| dob | string | no | Optional: date of birth (YYYY-MM-DD) of the person, to tell them apart from others with the same name |
| birth_year | number | no | Optional: birth year, if the full date isn't known |
| nationality | string | no | Optional: the person's nationality (country name or ISO code) |
| country | string | no | Optional: country where the person lives or the organisation is based |
| address | string | no | Optional: street address or city (free text). Flags addresses in comprehensively sanctioned regions: Crimea, the so-called DNR/LNR, Iran, North Korea, Cuba (Syria is flagged for review) |
| string | no | Optional: contact email, matched against emails and domains the lists give | |
| phone | string | no | Optional: phone number, matched on its last 9 digits against phones the lists give |
| website | string | no | Optional: website or domain, matched against websites the lists give |
| ids | array | no | Optional: identifiers to match against the lists: company registration or tax numbers, passport or national ID numbers, vessel IMO numbers, SWIFT/BIC codes, crypto addresses |
| owners | array | no | Optional: owners and their share (percent). Each is screened; listed owners holding 50% or more in total make the company blocked under the OFAC 50 percent rule |
| subject_type | string | no | Optional: whether the name is a company or a person. Defaults to company when the name has a legal suffix such as Inc or LLC (or, in a report, when it is an SEC-registered company); then person, vesse |
Domain registration date, age, registrar (RDAP) and email-auth records (MX, SPF, DMARC), which are common fraud signals, plus first_archived: the date of the Wayback Machine's earliest snapshot (null if none; archive.status says unavailable if archive.org didn't answer). notes holds factual remarks, such as a first snapshot under 90 days old or a registration years older than the first snapshot; t
| Parameter | Type | Required | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| domain | string | yes | Domain, URL, or email address |
Official Secretary of State business-search link for a US state, to verify a private company's status, formation date, and registered agent.
| Parameter | Type | Required | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| state | string | yes | Two-letter code or state name |
| company | string | no | Company name (optional) |
One-call due-diligence report: SEC profile (if public), sanctions screen, federal exclusions, domain signals (registration age, email records, Wayback Machine first-seen date), and state registry link, with a red-flag summary, a verdict (clear / review / hold; rules at https://mcp.pyxmark.com/#verdict) and source links. An agent should not pay or onboard on 'hold', and should ask a person on 'revi
| Parameter | Type | Required | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| name | string | no | Company or person name |
| domain | string | no | Company website or email domain |
| cik | string | no | SEC CIK |
| ticker | string | no | Ticker |
| state | string | no | US state of incorporation/registration |
| dob | string | no | Optional: date of birth (YYYY-MM-DD) of the person, to tell them apart from others with the same name |
| birth_year | number | no | Optional: birth year, if the full date isn't known |
| nationality | string | no | Optional: the person's nationality (country name or ISO code) |
| country | string | no | Optional: country where the person lives or the organisation is based |
| address | string | no | Optional: street address or city (free text). Flags addresses in comprehensively sanctioned regions: Crimea, the so-called DNR/LNR, Iran, North Korea, Cuba (Syria is flagged for review) |
| string | no | Optional: contact email, matched against emails and domains the lists give | |
| phone | string | no | Optional: phone number, matched on its last 9 digits against phones the lists give |
| website | string | no | Optional: website or domain, matched against websites the lists give |
| ids | array | no | Optional: identifiers to match against the lists: company registration or tax numbers, passport or national ID numbers, vessel IMO numbers, SWIFT/BIC codes, crypto addresses |
| owners | array | no | Optional: owners and their share (percent). Each is screened; listed owners holding 50% or more in total make the company blocked under the OFAC 50 percent rule |
| subject_type | string | no | Optional: whether the name is a company or a person. Defaults to company when the name has a legal suffix such as Inc or LLC (or, in a report, when it is an SEC-registered company); then person, vesse |
Free
$0 forever
- Every tool — any call limit is its publisher’s, not ours
- No card, and mcprush charges nothing for it
- Runs at its publisher’s own address — this marketplace is not in the path
- Nothing to cap, because mcprush bills nothing
What counts against your monthly calls
| Tool | Unit | Calls used | Out of the allowance |
|---|
Nothing here is billable: mcprush charges nothing to install Pyxmark or to call it, at any volume.
Call allowance · this installenforced at the gateway
Monthly allowance, in calls
—
—
Alert at 80% · then the tool returns a normal MCP error
Used this month: —
ATool-list grade · score 96 / 100
Release 0.1.0 · scanned 20 Oct 2026
Graded from the tools this server lists, not from its source code.
Two independent axes, because powerful and malicious are different questions. The grade is threat only. The capability level is blast radius, and it is never a penalty on the grade — it is priced as one subtract-only term in the score, where you can see it.
Threat score100
Client score96
Findings0 threat · 0 capability
Capabilityminimal
Coveragemanifest
Verificationnot in this report
Surface digest5c0a3a593d0dd12b2d9f9f83b517545a4f484fbf4d65e05b2d710ccc91ded97f
Score vectorthreat 100 → client 96
| Term | Level | What it prices | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
| capability-exposure | minimal | capability blast radius (minimal) — client exposure if the model is manipulated | −0 |
| coverage-honesty | manifest | inspection depth (manifest) — how much of the target the scan could see | −4 |
score = clamp(round(threatScore − E_cap − E_ver − E_cov), 0, 100). No model, no opinion, no network call at scoring time: the same methodology version against the same bytes always produces this number, and every line above is a field of the report rather than a summary of it.
What the scan could actually read
A grade is only as meaningful as its coverage, so the scanner publishes its own depth before it publishes its result.
The scan read each tool’s name, description, input schema and annotations exactly as the server listed them the last time it answered us; no code was reviewed. We ask the server again about once a month, and a list that changed is graded again.
Tool surfaceread
Implementation sourcenot available
Package metadatanot available
Live transportnot available
The implementation source was not read — this reflects the declared tool metadata only.
Capability — what it could do if the model were manipulated
Tags derived from each tool’s schema and the implementation, not from what the tool calls itself. minimal is the level these add up to.
| Tool | Capability tags | Why the tag was assigned |
|---|---|---|
| search_company | no tags | |
| company_profile | untrusted-input | untrusted-input: declares openWorldHint: true (interacts with entities outside the server) |
| screen_sanctions | no tags | |
| domain_age | untrusted-input | untrusted-input: declares openWorldHint: true (interacts with entities outside the server) |
| state_registry_link | no tags | |
| due_diligence_report | untrusted-input | untrusted-input: declares openWorldHint: true (interacts with entities outside the server) |
Toxic-flow graph
The lethal trifecta, checked as a graph rather than as a checklist: untrusted input, a sensitive source and an external sink have to meet before there is a path worth worrying about.
The public result for this release does not print the flow graph, so there is nothing to show here. That is not the same as "no paths were found": what the scan did read is above, under coverage.
Supply chain and provenance
Integrityfirst-seen
Surface digest5c0a3a593d0dd12b
Scanned2026-10-20
This is the first scan of this surface here, so there is nothing yet to compare it against.
Every result on this tab comes from one deterministic pass over the published package — offline, rule by rule, and auditable line by line above. Same methodology version, same bytes, same score.
Release history
This is an address its publisher runs: which release it serves is theirs to choose, so there is nothing here to pin. The history below is for reading; the current release on file is 0.1.0.
0.1.0
undated
latestNo release note was published with this version.
—
no reviews yet
Who can review
One review per account, from a signed-in account that does not publish this listing. Nothing else is asked — you can say what you think before you install it. Publishers can reply once per review, and a review can be edited or deleted by whoever wrote it.
Sign in to write one
Any signed-in account that does not publish Pyxmark can review it, once — before installing it or after. A review from an account that has installed it is marked as one.
No reviews yet
Nobody has reviewed this listing. The rating on the card is the mean of the reviews written here and nothing else, so there is no rating until somebody writes the first — which takes a signed-in account that does not publish it, and nothing else.