Google Search Console integration for Model Context Protocol (MCP)
Quién Patrocina is installed from its publisher's own source and answers where it runs, so this marketplace is not in the path of a single call. There is no address here to send one to, and a panel that pretended otherwise would be showing you an answer we made up. Install it and call it from your own client — the Installation tab has the entry for each one.
What it does
Which brands sponsor Spanish-language podcasts and YouTube channels in Spain and Latin America.
Quickstart
# 1 — add it to Claude Code
claude mcp add --scope user --transport http quien-patrocina-mcp https://quienpatrocina.com/mcp
# 2 — ask your agent for something these tools do
# search_podcast_sponsorships, get_brand_podcast_sponsorships, get_podcast_sponsors and 4 more
Quién Patrocina costs nothing on mcprush: there is no plan to choose here, no cap to set and nothing mcprush can bill you for.
Collected from a public index. Nobody has claimed this account, so nothing here was written by its author — claim it if it is yours.
Where are you running it?
Every route below installs the same thing and ends at the same approval screen. Nothing here runs on your machine and nothing runs on ours: this server answers at its publisher’s own address, and what you install is the connection straight to it.
This is a public server: it answers at its publisher’s own address and this marketplace is not in the path. Claude Code registers it in one command; --scope user makes it available in every project. The transport below is http, as the publisher's own manifest declares it.
claude mcp add --scope user --transport http quien-patrocina-mcp https://quienpatrocina.com/mcpReconnect, or start a new session, and the tools appear in the model’s tool list.
One config entry pointing straight at the publisher’s own address — this marketplace is not in the path, and nothing from this listing executes on your machine.
7 tools, with what each one reads, writes and reaches shown before you agree — the same list on every route above. Read the tool surface.
Tool surface
What the model actually sees. Descriptions are diffed on every release — see version history.
Search which brands sponsor Spanish-language podcasts or YouTube channels, filtered by brand, show, country or only ads with a promo code. Busca qué marcas patrocinan podcasts y canales en español, por marca, programa, país o con código de descuento. Returns placements from the last 30 days: brand, show, country, episode date, promo code, offer and links. Not for shows outside Spain and Latin Amer
| Parameter | Type | Required | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| brand | string | no | Brand name, partial is fine, e.g. 'Hostinger' |
| show | string | no | Podcast or YouTube channel name, partial is fine |
| country | string | no | Country of the show; accents optional / País del programa; tildes opcionales |
| with_promo_code | boolean | no | Only placements that include a promo code |
| limit | integer | no | — |
Where does a brand advertise in Spanish-language podcasts and YouTube channels? ¿En qué podcasts se anuncia una marca? Returns every show the brand sponsored in the last 30 days with episode counts, last date, promo codes and offers. If the name is ambiguous it returns candidate brand names instead. Data comes from written episode descriptions, not audio. / Los datos salen de descripciones escrita
| Parameter | Type | Required | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| brand | string | yes | Brand name, e.g. 'Trade Republic' |
Who sponsors a given Spanish-language podcast or YouTube channel, and which promo codes does it read? ¿Quién patrocina este podcast? Returns each sponsoring brand in the last 30 days with episode counts, last date, codes and offers. If the name is ambiguous it returns candidate show names instead. Data comes from written episode descriptions, not audio. / Los datos salen de descripciones escritas,
| Parameter | Type | Required | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| show | string | yes | Podcast or channel name, e.g. 'Tengo un Plan' |
Which brands sponsor the most Spanish-language podcasts and YouTube channels, overall or in one country? ¿Qué marcas patrocinan más podcasts? Returns brands ranked by number of different shows sponsored in the last 30 days. Data comes from written episode descriptions, not audio. / Los datos salen de descripciones escritas, no de audio.
| Parameter | Type | Required | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| country | string | no | Country of the show; accents optional / País del programa; tildes opcionales |
| limit | integer | no | — |
Which brands advertise in a podcast category (finance, technology, sports, news, comedy, education...), optionally within one country? ¿Qué marcas se anuncian en podcasts de una categoría? Category names follow Apple Podcasts in Spanish; accents optional. Returns brands ranked by number of shows sponsored in that category over the last 30 days, with example shows and codes. If the category is not
| Parameter | Type | Required | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| category | string | yes | Category, e.g. 'Negocios y finanzas', 'Tecnología', 'Deportes' |
| country | string | no | Country of the show; accents optional / País del programa; tildes opcionales |
| limit | integer | no | — |
Check whether a given brand has a written sponsorship mention on a given Spanish-language podcast or YouTube channel in the last 30 days. Comprueba si una marca tiene mención de patrocinio escrita en un programa. Returns status (mention_found, no_mention_found, brand_unknown, show_unknown), the matching episodes with date, promo code and link, and how many other shows the brand sponsors. no_mentio
| Parameter | Type | Required | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| brand | string | yes | Brand name, e.g. 'Hostinger' |
| show | string | yes | Podcast or channel name, e.g. 'Spicy4tuna' |
Which brands could a podcaster, network or agency pitch for sponsorship? ¿A qué marcas proponer un patrocinio? Takes a Spanish-language show and returns brands that sponsored similar shows in the last 30 days but did not sponsor this show. Similar means same category and country; if that finds nothing it widens to same category, then same country, and says which in basis. Data comes from written e
| Parameter | Type | Required | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| show | string | yes | — |
| limit | integer | no | — |
- Every tool — any call limit is its publisher’s, not ours
- No card, and mcprush charges nothing for it
- Runs at its publisher’s own address — this marketplace is not in the path
- Nothing to cap, because mcprush bills nothing
What counts against your monthly calls
| Tool | Unit | Calls used | Out of the allowance |
|---|
Nothing here is billable: mcprush charges nothing to install Quién Patrocina or to call it, at any volume.
Two independent axes, because powerful and malicious are different questions. The grade is threat only. The capability level is blast radius, and it is never a penalty on the grade — it is priced as one subtract-only term in the score, where you can see it.
| Term | Level | What it prices | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
| capability-exposure | minimal | capability blast radius (minimal) — client exposure if the model is manipulated | −0 |
| coverage-honesty | manifest | inspection depth (manifest) — how much of the target the scan could see | −4 |
What the scan could actually read
A grade is only as meaningful as its coverage, so the scanner publishes its own depth before it publishes its result.
The scan read each tool’s name, description, input schema and annotations exactly as the server listed them the last time it answered us; no code was reviewed. We ask the server again about once a month, and a list that changed is graded again.
The implementation source was not read — this reflects the declared tool metadata only.
Capability — what it could do if the model were manipulated
Tags derived from each tool’s schema and the implementation, not from what the tool calls itself. minimal is the level these add up to.
| Tool | Capability tags | Why the tag was assigned |
|---|---|---|
| search_podcast_sponsorships | no tags | |
| get_brand_podcast_sponsorships | no tags | |
| get_podcast_sponsors | no tags | |
| list_top_podcast_sponsors | no tags | |
| list_sponsors_by_category | no tags | |
| check_brand_on_show | no tags | |
| find_sponsor_leads_for_podcast | no tags |
Toxic-flow graph
The lethal trifecta, checked as a graph rather than as a checklist: untrusted input, a sensitive source and an external sink have to meet before there is a path worth worrying about.
The public result for this release does not print the flow graph, so there is nothing to show here. That is not the same as "no paths were found": what the scan did read is above, under coverage.
Supply chain and provenance
This is the first scan of this surface here, so there is nothing yet to compare it against.
Every result on this tab comes from one deterministic pass over the published package — offline, rule by rule, and auditable line by line above. Same methodology version, same bytes, same score.
Release history
This is an address its publisher runs: which release it serves is theirs to choose, so there is nothing here to pin. The history below is for reading; the current release on file is 1.1.0.
No release note was published with this version.
One review per account, from a signed-in account that does not publish this listing. Nothing else is asked — you can say what you think before you install it. Publishers can reply once per review, and a review can be edited or deleted by whoever wrote it.
Any signed-in account that does not publish Quién Patrocina can review it, once — before installing it or after. A review from an account that has installed it is marked as one.
Nobody has reviewed this listing. The rating on the card is the mean of the reviews written here and nothing else, so there is no rating until somebody writes the first — which takes a signed-in account that does not publish it, and nothing else.