MCP server that wraps the Dagster GraphQL API — manage runs, assets, schedules, sensors, and backfills from any MCP client
ReliaSim is installed from its publisher's own source and answers where it runs, so this marketplace is not in the path of a single call. There is no address here to send one to, and a panel that pretended otherwise would be showing you an answer we made up. Install it and call it from your own client — the Installation tab has the entry for each one.
What it does
Reliability and bottleneck simulation for manufacturing lines; run experiments, sweep buffers.
Quickstart
# 1 — add it to Claude Code
claude mcp add --scope user --transport http reliasim-mcp https://reliasim.com/mcp
# 2 — ask your agent for something these tools do
# find_bottleneck, get_chapter_facts, get_chapter_narrative and 4 more
ReliaSim costs nothing on mcprush: there is no plan to choose here, no cap to set and nothing mcprush can bill you for.
Collected from a public index. Nobody has claimed this account, so nothing here was written by its author — claim it if it is yours.
Where are you running it?
Every route below installs the same thing and ends at the same approval screen. Nothing here runs on your machine and nothing runs on ours: this server answers at its publisher’s own address, and what you install is the connection straight to it.
This is a public server: it answers at its publisher’s own address and this marketplace is not in the path. Claude Code registers it in one command; --scope user makes it available in every project. The transport below is http, as the publisher's own manifest declares it.
claude mcp add --scope user --transport http reliasim-mcp https://reliasim.com/mcpReconnect, or start a new session, and the tools appear in the model’s tool list.
One config entry pointing straight at the publisher’s own address — this marketplace is not in the path, and nothing from this listing executes on your machine.
7 tools, with what each one reads, writes and reaches shown before you agree — the same list on every route above. Read the tool surface.
Tool surface
What the model actually sees. Descriptions are diffed on every release — see version history.
Single Run bottleneck analysis for the selected chapter — which node has the worst availability, per-interrupt downtime split, throughput, OEE. All eight chapters return verified dys-cli sales-prototype numbers. ANTI-FABRICATION: numbers in the response are canonical reference values from real dys-cli engine runs. Quote them VERBATIM. Do not round, estimate, or recall from training data. For follo
| Parameter | Type | Required | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| chapter | string | no | Which curriculum chapter the tool should answer about. Format: bs<1-5>-<ct|leds>. Both tracks run on the same real plant data — ct = Constraint-Level (interrupts rolled up to one Weibull per machi |
Structural facts of the selected chapter — topology, rate limits, interrupt distributions, expected efficiency. Use when the user asks about the line's configuration. ANTI-FABRICATION: rates and distributions are verified .aidos-file values. Quote VERBATIM; do not estimate or substitute training-data recall.
| Parameter | Type | Required | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| chapter | string | no | Which curriculum chapter the tool should answer about. Format: bs<1-5>-<ct|leds>. Both tracks run on the same real plant data — ct = Constraint-Level (interrupts rolled up to one Weibull per machi |
Long-form narrative for the selected chapter — what the chapter adds to the complexity ladder and the key teaching point. Use when the user asks 'walk me through this' or wants the conceptual primer. Pure prose, no numerical claims; safe to summarize.
| Parameter | Type | Required | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| chapter | string | no | Which curriculum chapter the tool should answer about. Format: bs<1-5>-<ct|leds>. Both tracks run on the same real plant data — ct = Constraint-Level (interrupts rolled up to one Weibull per machi |
Gain/Loss experiment — disable each interrupt one at a time, measure production recovered. Reveals the ACTUAL impact of each failure mode (Gain ≠ Loss: removing one lets others fire more often). Available on bs1-leds, bs3-leds, bs4-ct, bs4-leds. Use when the user asks 'what if we fixed X?' / 'which interrupt matters most if we actually fixed it?' / 'show me the Pareto'. ANTI-FABRICATION: p
| Parameter | Type | Required | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| chapter | string | no | Which curriculum chapter the tool should answer about. Format: bs<1-5>-<ct|leds>. Both tracks run on the same real plant data — ct = Constraint-Level (interrupts rolled up to one Weibull per machi |
Buffer Tradeoff experiment — sweep a buffer's capacity from 50 → 10,000 units, measure throughput gain. Shows the diminishing-returns elbow for buffer sizing. Only defined on bs4-ct and bs4-leds; each chapter has THREE inline buffers with different placements (pass buffer id to pick one). Compare CT vs LEDS on the same slot to see why interrupt-detail level changes buffer ROI math (e.g. b3:
| Parameter | Type | Required | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| chapter | string | no | Chapter id. Only bs4-ct and bs4-leds have buffer tradeoffs defined. |
| buffer | string | no | Buffer id to sweep. The Buffer-Options Constraint-Level model has b3 (Buffer 1, between Capper↔Labeler), b4 (Buffer 2, between Labeler↔Case Packer), b5 (Buffer 3, between Case Packer↔Palletizer) |
Definitional primer for ReliaSim's framework concepts — Constraint, Buffer, Interrupt, Converter, cascading losses, OEE, Gain/Loss methodology, Buffer Tradeoff. Returns bundled theory content, NOT interpretation of any specific simulation run. Use for 'what is X?' / 'how does X work?' / 'explain the framework' questions. For line-specific claims (throughput, availability, what-if), call the sim to
| Parameter | Type | Required | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| concept | string | yes | Which concept to explain. Returns a definitional primer — theory, not interpretation of a specific simulation run. Use for 'what is a Constraint?' / 'what are cascading losses?' / 'explain Gain-Loss'. |
Side-by-side comparison of two chapters — tracks, topology, OEE, throughput, headline bottleneck. Output is sim-derived (no interpretation drift). Use for 'how does X compare to Y?' / 'what's the difference between Constraint-Level and LEDS-Level on the same model?' / 'what changes when we add buffers?' questions. ANTI-FABRICATION: per-chapter OEE/throughput numbers are real reference values; the
| Parameter | Type | Required | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| chapter_a | string | yes | First chapter id (left column of the comparison). Defaults to bs1-ct. |
| chapter_b | string | yes | Second chapter id (right column of the comparison). Defaults to bs1-leds — same plant data as bs1-ct, but with interrupts drilled down to named failure modes; the canonical first-look comparison. |
- Every tool — any call limit is its publisher’s, not ours
- No card, and mcprush charges nothing for it
- Runs at its publisher’s own address — this marketplace is not in the path
- Nothing to cap, because mcprush bills nothing
What counts against your monthly calls
| Tool | Unit | Calls used | Out of the allowance |
|---|
Nothing here is billable: mcprush charges nothing to install ReliaSim or to call it, at any volume.
Two independent axes, because powerful and malicious are different questions. The grade is threat only. The capability level is blast radius, and it is never a penalty on the grade — it is priced as one subtract-only term in the score, where you can see it.
This listing is an address its publisher runs, and you connect to it directly — this marketplace is not in the path. The scanner reads packages and public source, and an address is neither. So there is no grade — not a withheld one, an unmeasured one.
Release history
This is an address its publisher runs: which release it serves is theirs to choose, so there is nothing here to pin. The history below is for reading; the current release on file is 1.0.0.
No release note was published with this version.
One review per account, from a signed-in account that does not publish this listing. Nothing else is asked — you can say what you think before you install it. Publishers can reply once per review, and a review can be edited or deleted by whoever wrote it.
Any signed-in account that does not publish ReliaSim can review it, once — before installing it or after. A review from an account that has installed it is marked as one.
Nobody has reviewed this listing. The rating on the card is the mean of the reviews written here and nothing else, so there is no rating until somebody writes the first — which takes a signed-in account that does not publish it, and nothing else.