Check a Base counterparty before you pay it: EAS attestations and on-chain risk reports.
Nothing to run from here
Intangible Asset Valuation is installed from its publisher's own source and answers where it runs, so this marketplace is not in the path of a single call. There is no address here to send one to, and a panel that pretended otherwise would be showing you an answer we made up. Install it and call it from your own client — the Installation tab has the entry for each one.
93/100
trust score
4
downloads a day
local
runs on your machine
110
downloads in 30d
What it does
Intangible asset valuation: 14 tools, 124+ formulas for IP, technology, goodwill, PPA, impairment.
Quickstart
# 1 — add it to Claude Code
claude mcp add --scope user intangible-asset-valuation-mcp '--' uvx --from intangible-valuation intangible-valuation-mcp
# 2 — ask your agent for something these tools do
# valuation_time_value, valuation_discount_rate, valuation_cost_approach and 11 more
Intangible Asset Valuation costs nothing on mcprush: there is no plan to choose here, no cap to set and nothing mcprush can bill you for.
Publishernot claimed
SCAll 5 servers
simonplmak-cloud5 servers
3 categories
Collected from a public index. Nobody has claimed this account, so nothing here was written by its author — claim it if it is yours.
Installation
Where are you running it?
Every route below installs the same thing and ends at the same approval screen. This one runs on your machine: your client starts Intangible Asset Valuation as a process under your own user, with your files and your network, so the tool surface below is what it can do to your computer rather than to a server somewhere else. Its scan result is on the Security tab — read the surface before you approve it.
Claude Codedeclared by this listing
This is a public server: you run it yourself and this marketplace is not in the path. You need uv (docs.astral.sh/uv): uvx comes with it. Claude Code registers it in one command; --scope user makes it available in every project. The '--' is in quotes so that PowerShell passes it on.
claude mcp add --scope user intangible-asset-valuation-mcp '--' uvx --from intangible-valuation intangible-valuation-mcpReconnect, or start a new session, and the tools appear in the model’s tool list.
Free on mcprush, and it runs from its publisher’s own package: this marketplace is not in the path, so there is no key of ours to hold and no card to add.
What it writes
One config entry your client uses to start the process locally. A local server runs with your file system and your network, which is why it is priced without metering.
What you approve
14 tools, with what each one reads, writes and reaches shown before you agree — the same list on every route above. Read the tool surface.
Tool surface
What the model actually sees. Descriptions are diffed on every release — see version history.
Time value of money: discount or compound a single sum, value level and growing annuities and perpetuities, and compute a terminal value by Gordon growth or exit multiple. Method selects the formula. Use to move cash flows through time or to value a terminal value in a DCF; combine with a rate from valuation_discount_rate. For uneven multi-period cash flows use valuation_income_methods; for rate c
No parameter schema on file.
Construct discount and capitalization rates: build-up, CAPM, WACC, tax-amortization benefit, control premium, Finnerty DLOM, and currency/country-risk adjustment. Method selects the formula. Use to derive the rate that feeds every income-based method; build_up and capm estimate cost of equity, wacc blends debt and equity. For a cross-border rate with currency and country premia use method currency
No parameter schema on file.
Cost approach: depreciated reproduction cost from a cost breakdown and depreciated replacement cost with equivalent utility, both reduced by obsolescence. Method selects the formula. Use when no income or market evidence exists, or to corroborate income and market indications for internally developed intangibles. For income-based indications use valuation_income_methods; for market evidence use va
No parameter schema on file.
Market approach: value from comparable transaction revenue multiples or capitalize a royalty stream into a perpetuity value. Method selects the formula. Use when reliable comparable transactions or royalty rates exist for the subject asset. For income-based excess earnings use valuation_income_methods; for royalty-rate selection and adjustment use valuation_royalty_analysis. Parameters apply per m
No parameter schema on file.
Income approach: relief from royalty, multi-period and single-period excess earnings, incremental cash flow, and contributory asset charges. Method selects the formula. Use for the primary valuation of identifiable intangibles where cash flows can be projected; MPEE for customer-related and technology assets, RFR for IP with observable royalty rates. For royalty-rate inputs use valuation_royalty_a
No parameter schema on file.
Intellectual property: risk-adjusted patent value, trademark/brand value, copyright income value, and trade-secret value under secrecy risk. Method selects the formula. Use to value a specific IP right; patent weights projected cash flows by probability of success, trademark uses brand strength to set the royalty. For technology, software, data, and platform assets use valuation_technology; for cu
No parameter schema on file.
Technology assets: developed technology under life-cycle risk, software under cost and income, data assets with a quality adjustment, and platforms with network effects. Method selects the formula. Use for developed technology, software, data, and platform intangibles; developed_technology and software blend cost and income evidence. For patents, trademarks, copyrights, and trade secrets use valua
No parameter schema on file.
Customer-related intangibles: customer relationships with attrition, distribution networks by channel profitability, and non-compete agreements on protected profits. Method selects the formula. Use for customer relationships, distribution networks, and non-compete assets; customer_relationships projects multi-period revenue with a retention rate. For the workforce and key-person assets use valuati
No parameter schema on file.
Human capital: assembled-workforce value by replacement cost and key-person value from revenue contribution and departure risk. Method selects the formula. Use for assembled workforce and key-person intangibles; assembled_workforce nets training and attrition into a replacement cost. For customer-related assets use valuation_customer; for technology assets use valuation_technology. Parameters appl
No parameter schema on file.
Goodwill and purchase price allocation: goodwill as the residual, a full PPA waterfall across identified intangibles, and useful-life estimation. Method selects the formula. Use for ASC 805 / IFRS 3 business combinations; purchase_price_allocation allocates consideration to identified intangibles with the remainder to goodwill. For subsequent goodwill and intangible impairment testing use valuatio
No parameter schema on file.
Impairment testing: goodwill impairment and intangible impairment under US GAAP (ASC 350) or IFRS (IAS 36). Method selects the formula. Use for annual or triggering-event impairment testing; goodwill_impairment compares a reporting unit's carrying value with its fair value. To compute the initial goodwill or allocation use valuation_goodwill_ppa; for the underlying asset fair values use the releva
No parameter schema on file.
Royalty analysis: benchmark royalty-rate ranges by IP type and industry, adjust a base rate for deal factors, and apply the 25% rule of thumb. Method selects the formula. Use to select and support a royalty rate before a relief-from-royalty or royalty-capitalization valuation. To apply the chosen rate in a valuation use valuation_income_methods (relief_from_royalty) or valuation_market_approach (r
No parameter schema on file.
Uncertainty analysis: Monte Carlo valuation, Monte Carlo sensitivity ranking, decision-tree expected values, and one-at-a-time sensitivity analysis. Method selects the formula. Use to quantify and stress the uncertainty around a point valuation; monte_carlo simulates all listed inputs, monte_carlo_sensitivity ranks the drivers. For a single deterministic point value use the relevant valuation tool
No parameter schema on file.
Transfer pricing and litigation: the Comparable Uncontrolled Price arm's-length range and patent infringement damages with pre-judgment interest. Method selects the formula. Use for OECD transfer-pricing pricing of intercompany intangibles and for patent infringement damages awards. For royalty-rate benchmarking to set a rate use valuation_royalty_analysis; for the substantive asset valuation use
No parameter schema on file.
Free
$0 forever
- Every tool, no call limit
- No card, and mcprush charges nothing for it
- Source published under MIT
- Runs on your machine — nothing of it reaches our gateway
- Nothing to cap, because mcprush bills nothing
What counts against your monthly calls
| Tool | Unit | Calls used | Out of the allowance |
|---|
Nothing here is billable: mcprush charges nothing to install Intangible Asset Valuation or to call it, at any volume.
Call allowance · this installenforced at the gateway
Monthly allowance, in calls
—
—
Alert at 80% · then the tool returns a normal MCP error
Used this month: —
ATrust score 93 / 100
Release 2.1.2 · scanned 6 Oct 2026
Two independent axes, because powerful and malicious are different questions. The grade is threat only. The capability level is blast radius, and it is never a penalty on the grade — it is priced as one subtract-only term in the score, where you can see it.
Threat score100
Client score93
Findings1 threat · 0 capability
Capabilityhigh
Coveragesource
Verificationrepo
Surface digest0f1666f73daff94ece85221371ea41cc06773ea8118572d9217791e4776550ba
Score vectorthreat 100 → client 93
| Term | Level | What it prices | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
| capability-exposure | high | capability blast radius (high) — client exposure if the model is manipulated | −6 |
| verification-discount | repo | publisher verification (public source) — no provenance, but the source is public and inspectable | −1 |
| coverage-honesty | source | inspection depth (source) — how much of the target the scan could see | −0 |
score = clamp(round(threatScore − E_cap − E_ver − E_cov), 0, 100). No model, no opinion, no network call at scoring time: the same methodology version against the same bytes always produces this number, and every line above is a field of the report rather than a summary of it.
What the scan could actually read
A grade is only as meaningful as its coverage, so the scanner publishes its own depth before it publishes its result.
Tool surfacenot available
Implementation sourceread
Package metadataread
Live transportnot available
No tools were enumerated, so prompt-injection, capability and toxic-flow analysis had no tool surface to inspect. To grade a package’s real runtime tools, scan the running server: --command "npx -y <package>".
Capability — what it could do if the model were manipulated
Tags derived from each tool’s schema and the implementation, not from what the tool calls itself. high is the level these add up to.
| Tool | Capability tags | Why the tag was assigned |
|---|---|---|
| No per-tool rows for this release — see the note below. | ||
can execute shell commands or code
Toxic-flow graph
The lethal trifecta, checked as a graph rather than as a checklist: untrusted input, a sensitive source and an external sink have to meet before there is a path worth worrying about.
The public result for this release does not print the flow graph, so there is nothing to show here. That is not the same as "no paths were found": what the scan did read is above, under coverage.
Supply chain and provenance
Integrityfirst-seen
Surface digest0f1666f73daff94e
Scanned2026-10-06
This is the first scan of this surface here, so there is nothing yet to compare it against.
Every result on this tab comes from one deterministic pass over the published package — offline, rule by rule, and auditable line by line above. Same methodology version, same bytes, same score.
Release history
Always latest — the install command names no version, so it installs the newest release when it runs; the current release on file is 2.1.2. Pin a release below and the command asks for exactly that one.
2.1.2
2 Oct 2026
latestNo release note was published with this version.
2.1.0
2 Oct 2026
No release note was published with this version.
2.0.0
undated
- The version this listing was on when mcprush began following its releases. The registry was not asked when it shipped, so this row carries no date.
—
no reviews yet
Who can review
One review per account, from a signed-in account that does not publish this listing. Nothing else is asked — you can say what you think before you install it. Publishers can reply once per review, and a review can be edited or deleted by whoever wrote it.
Sign in to write one
Any signed-in account that does not publish Intangible Asset Valuation can review it, once — before installing it or after. A review from an account that has installed it is marked as one.
No reviews yet
Nobody has reviewed this listing. The rating on the card is the mean of the reviews written here and nothing else, so there is no rating until somebody writes the first — which takes a signed-in account that does not publish it, and nothing else.