Aimé Leon Dore catalogue search, products and prices.
Tools
get_product_reviews
Fetch paginated Amazon product reviews for one ASIN via Pangolinfo, with the upstream billing (pointCost) reported verbatim. Billing: docs and measured calls show 5 credits/page; the upstream tool description currently states 10 credits/page — this tool reports pointCost as returned, it does not…
filterByStar string
Star filter. 'critical' = negative reviews.
sortBy string
Sort order: recent (default) or helpful.
mediaType string
all_contents (default) or media_reviews_only.
A call is made on an account: it counts against an allowance and the publisher sees it, which is why this one asks who you are first.
99/100
trust score
5
tools declared
remote
via our gateway
—
p95 latency
What it does
Pangolinfo Review Mining MCP is a dedicated MCP server for Amazon product review mining for AI agents. It fetches product reviews and mines them locally for complaint detection, rating distribution and monthly sentiment trends, and ranked complaint topics with example titles. Complaint themes include quality defects, battery, connectivity, comfort, sound, shipping, returns, value, authenticity and app/software. Powered by the Pangolinfo Reviews API (5 credits per review page). It is review mining only: no product search, best sellers, categories, WIPO, SERP or Alexa tools, deliberately differentiated from the general Pangolinfo Amazon Data MCP. Official website: https://www.pangolinfo.com/amazon-review-api/?utm_source=mcprush&utm_medium=referral
Quickstart
# 1 — sign in once: npx mcprush@latest login
# it asks for a key from mcprush.com/dashboard#access
# 2 — install
npx mcprush@latest add pangolin-spg/pangolinfo-review-mining-mcp
# 3 — ask your agent for something these tools do
# get_product_reviews, mine_complaints, review_sentiment_summary and 2 more
Windows PowerShell says 'running scripts is disabled on this system'? Run Set-ExecutionPolicy -Scope CurrentUser RemoteSigned once, or type npx.cmd instead of npx (codex.cmd, gemini.cmd, grok.cmd likewise). PowerShell 7 needs neither.
Pangolinfo Review Mining MCP costs nothing on mcprush: there is no plan to choose here, no cap to set and nothing mcprush can bill you for.
Publisher
Installation
Where are you running it?
Every route below installs the same thing and ends at the same approval screen. Nothing here runs on your machine — this server runs on infrastructure we host behind our gateway, and what you install is the connection to it.
Claude Codenot declared — it may still work
Claude Code has its own MCP command, and the key rides on it as a header — the gateway refuses a call that carries none. Claude Code reads MCPRUSH_KEY each time it connects, so the key stays out of its config: export your key from Access in your shell profile (macOS, Linux), or run setx MCPRUSH_KEY <your key> and open a new terminal (Windows). Or let npx mcprush@latest add pangolin-spg/pangolinfo-review-mining-mcp write the entry with the key for you; --scope user makes it available in every project. The first connection after a quiet spell starts the server, which takes up to a minute: if your client says it failed to connect, reconnect after that (/mcp in Claude Code).
claude mcp add --transport http --scope user pangolinfo-review-mining-mcp https://mcprush.com/gw/pangolinfo-review-mining-mcp/mcp --header 'Authorization: Bearer ${MCPRUSH_KEY}'Reconnect, or start a new session, and the tools appear in the model’s tool list.
Free to install on mcprush: no card. The gateway still answers a key, so you sign in once — which is also what gives you saved lists, release alerts and a budget cap.
What it writes
One config entry pointing at the gateway. The server itself runs on infrastructure we host, so nothing from this listing executes on your machine.
What you approve
5 tools, with what each one reads, writes and reaches shown before you agree — the same list on every route above. Read the tool surface.
Tool surface
What the model actually sees. Descriptions are diffed on every release — see version history.
Fetch paginated Amazon product reviews for one ASIN via Pangolinfo, with the upstream billing (pointCost) reported verbatim. Billing: docs and measured calls show 5 credits/page; the upstream tool description currently states 10 credits/page — this tool reports pointCost as returned, it does not…
| Parameter | Type | Required | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| filterByStar | string | no | Star filter. 'critical' = negative reviews. |
| sortBy | string | no | Sort order: recent (default) or helpful. |
| mediaType | string | no | all_contents (default) or media_reviews_only. |
Extract complaint signals from negative (critical, 1-3 star) reviews for one ASIN. Tags each complaint review with human-readable themes (quality_defect, battery_power, connectivity, comfort_fit, sound_quality, shipping_delivery, returns_refunds, value_price, authenticity, app_software) using a…
| Parameter | Type | Required | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| minHelpful | integer | no | Only keep complaints with at least this many helpful votes. |
Rating distribution, average star, negative/critical/positive shares, and a monthly sentiment trend for one ASIN's reviews. Pure local computation over fetched reviews.
No parameter schema on file.
Ranked complaint themes across negative reviews for one ASIN, with counts, shares, and example review titles for traceability.
| Parameter | Type | Required | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| topN | integer | no | How many top themes to return. |
Combined per-ASIN review-mining summary: totals, rating distribution, monthly trend, top complaint topics, most-endorsed complaints, and billing as returned. When the ASIN matches the documented Oct 12, 2026 baseline (B0FQFB8FMG), the report also cites that historical baseline for reference,…
No parameter schema on file.
Free
$0 forever
- Every tool, no call limit, and mcprush charges nothing
- A buyer key from your dashboard — the gateway refuses a call without one
- Answers through our gateway, so every call is in your log
- Nothing to cap, because mcprush bills nothing
What counts against your monthly calls
| Tool | Unit | Calls used | Out of the allowance |
|---|
Nothing here is billable: mcprush charges nothing to install Pangolinfo Review Mining MCP or to call it, and its free tier carries no monthly call limit.
Call allowance · this installenforced at the gateway
Monthly allowance, in calls
—
—
Alert at 80% · then the tool returns a normal MCP error
Used this month: —
ATrust score 99 / 100
Release 0.1.0 · scanned 26 Oct 2026
Two independent axes, because powerful and malicious are different questions. The grade is threat only. The capability level is blast radius, and it is never a penalty on the grade — it is priced as one subtract-only term in the score, where you can see it.
Threat score100
Client score99
Findings2 threat · 0 capability
Capabilityminimal
Coveragesource
Verificationrepo
Surface digest2dc22d3bf39daa3966da07121ef3ae7218597d0cc75600bd6ac9471b4c82a657
Score vectorthreat 100 → client 99
| Term | Level | What it prices | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
| capability-exposure | minimal | capability blast radius (minimal) — client exposure if the model is manipulated | −0 |
| verification-discount | repo | publisher verification (public source) — no provenance, but the source is public and inspectable | −1 |
| coverage-honesty | source | inspection depth (source) — how much of the target the scan could see | −0 |
score = clamp(round(threatScore − E_cap − E_ver − E_cov), 0, 100). No model, no opinion, no network call at scoring time: the same methodology version against the same bytes always produces this number, and every line above is a field of the report rather than a summary of it.
What the scan could actually read
A grade is only as meaningful as its coverage, so the scanner publishes its own depth before it publishes its result.
Tool surfacenot available
Implementation sourceread
Package metadataread
Live transportnot available
No tools were enumerated, so prompt-injection, capability and toxic-flow analysis had no tool surface to inspect. To grade a package’s real runtime tools, scan the running server: --command "npx -y <package>".
Capability — what it could do if the model were manipulated
Tags derived from each tool’s schema and the implementation, not from what the tool calls itself. minimal is the level these add up to.
| Tool | Capability tags | Why the tag was assigned |
|---|---|---|
| No per-tool rows for this release — see the note below. | ||
No tool surface was enumerated, so there is nothing to attribute a capability to.
Toxic-flow graph
The lethal trifecta, checked as a graph rather than as a checklist: untrusted input, a sensitive source and an external sink have to meet before there is a path worth worrying about.
The public result for this release does not print the flow graph, so there is nothing to show here. That is not the same as "no paths were found": what the scan did read is above, under coverage.
Supply chain and provenance
Integrityfirst-seen
Surface digest2dc22d3bf39daa39
Scanned2026-10-26
This is the first scan of this surface here, so there is nothing yet to compare it against.
Every result on this tab comes from one deterministic pass over the published package — offline, rule by rule, and auditable line by line above. Same methodology version, same bytes, same score.
Release history
The gateway serves every install the publisher’s current release, so a release cannot be pinned or rolled back to here yet. The history below is for reading; the current release on file is 0.1.0.
0.1.0
26 Oct 2026
latest- The version this listing went live with, after review.
—
no reviews yet
Who can review
One review per account, from a signed-in account that does not publish this listing. Nothing else is asked — you can say what you think before you install it. Publishers can reply once per review, and a review can be edited or deleted by whoever wrote it.
Sign in to write one
Any signed-in account that does not publish Pangolinfo Review Mining MCP can review it, once — before installing it or after. A review from an account that has installed it is marked as one.
No reviews yet
Nobody has reviewed this listing. The rating on the card is the mean of the reviews written here and nothing else, so there is no rating until somebody writes the first — which takes a signed-in account that does not publish it, and nothing else.