Local Markdown library of the papers an evidence review cites: metadata, abstract and full text
Its author marked it deprecated in the MCP Registry
Nothing to run from here
ukintel.uk — UK company, tender and grant intelligence is installed from its publisher's own source and answers where it runs, so this marketplace is not in the path of a single call. There is no address here to send one to, and a panel that pretended otherwise would be showing you an answer we made up. Install it and call it from your own client — the Installation tab has the entry for each one.
96/100
tool-list score
13
tools declared
remote
at its publisher
—
calls last 7d
What it does
Companies House, Find a Tender and Find a Grant as paid JSON for agents. USDC via x402, no signup.
Quickstart
# 1 — add it to Claude Code
claude mcp add --scope user --transport http ukintel-uk-uk-company-tender-and-grant-intell-mcp https://api.ukintel.uk/mcp
# 2 — ask your agent for something these tools do
# uk_preview, uk_health, uk_company_search and 10 more
ukintel.uk — UK company, tender and grant intelligence costs nothing on mcprush: there is no plan to choose here, no cap to set and nothing mcprush can bill you for.
Publishernot claimed
UKAll 1 server
ukintel1 server
1 category
Collected from a public index. Nobody has claimed this account, so nothing here was written by its author — claim it if it is yours.
Installation
Where are you running it?
Every route below installs the same thing and ends at the same approval screen. Nothing here runs on your machine and nothing runs on ours: this server answers at its publisher’s own address, and what you install is the connection straight to it.
Claude Codedeclared by this listing
This is a public server: it answers at its publisher’s own address and this marketplace is not in the path. Claude Code registers it in one command; --scope user makes it available in every project. The transport below is http, as the publisher's own manifest declares it.
claude mcp add --scope user --transport http ukintel-uk-uk-company-tender-and-grant-intell-mcp https://api.ukintel.uk/mcpReconnect, or start a new session, and the tools appear in the model’s tool list.
Free on mcprush, and it answers at its publisher’s own address: this marketplace is not in the path, so there is no key of ours to hold and no card to add.
What it writes
One config entry pointing straight at the publisher’s own address — this marketplace is not in the path, and nothing from this listing executes on your machine.
What you approve
13 tools, with what each one reads, writes and reaches shown before you agree — the same list on every route above. Read the tool surface.
Tool surface
What the model actually sees. Descriptions are diffed on every release — see version history.
A genuine, freshly-computed sample so an agent can see the exact response shape before spending anything. Default: a real company verdict, rotating daily. Add ?wing=tenders for a real live-tender brief, or ?wing=grants for a real grant eligibility verdict - all rotating daily. Every response carries the same envelope: query, result, verdict, confidence, as_of, sources, attribution, notice, cost.
| Parameter | Type | Required | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| wing | string | no | Which product family to sample: company (default), tenders or grants. |
Liveness and upstream health. Free, because frameworks probe before they route money. Free. Returns: status, version, network, upstreams{}, rules_version, warnings[].
No parameter schema on file.
Find a UK company by name. Returns the top 5 matches from the Companies House register with number, name, status and incorporation date. Taster tier - cheap enough to try on a whim before paying for a full profile or verdict. Costs $0.005 USDC per call (x402, Base mainnet). Returns: results[] of { company_number, name, status, incorporated, address_snippet }, plus total_matches.
| Parameter | Type | Required | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| q | string | yes | Company name or fragment to search for. |
| limit | integer | no | Number of matches to return, 1-5. Defaults to 5. |
One UK company as clean structured JSON: status, incorporation date, company type, SIC codes, registered office, accounts and confirmation-statement due dates with overdue booleans, and officer counts. Sourced live from Companies House. Costs $0.02 USDC per call (x402, Base mainnet). Returns: result = { name, company_number, status, type, incorporated, registered_office, sic_codes[], accounts{},
| Parameter | Type | Required | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| number | string | yes | UK company number. 8 characters; two-letter prefixes are supported (SC = Scotland, NI = Northern Ireland, OC = LLP). |
| detail | string | no | Set to 'full' to add filing history (last 10) and anonymised officer records, and to lift the ~800 token response cap. |
Should an agent trust this UK company? Returns a 0-100 verdict and low_risk/caution/high_risk band, with every rule that fired named in the response and the register value that triggered it: STATUS_DISSOLVED, STRIKE_OFF_ACTIVE, ACCOUNTS_OVERDUE, NO_ACTIVE_DIRECTORS, OFFICER_CHURN, FS_SIC_NOT_FCA and 9 more. Rules are deterministic and published, so you can audit the verdict or re-weight it. Never
| Parameter | Type | Required | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| number | string | yes | UK company number. 8 characters; two-letter prefixes are supported (SC = Scotland, NI = Northern Ireland, OC = LLP). |
| detail | string | no | Set to 'full' to add filing history (last 10) and anonymised officer records, and to lift the ~800 token response cap. |
Is this UK company regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority? Returns register status, a permissions summary and any warnings - sold separately from the full verdict because fintech-vetting agents often want only this. Costs $0.02 USDC per call (x402, Base mainnet). Returns: result.fca = { checked, regulated, frn, firm_name, status, permissions_summary, warnings[], note }. When the register is
| Parameter | Type | Required | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| number | string | yes | UK company number. 8 characters; two-letter prefixes are supported (SC = Scotland, NI = Northern Ireland, OC = LLP). |
Live UK public-sector tenders from Find a Tender and Contracts Finder in one call. Returns the top 10 matching notices as one-paragraph plain-English briefs with buyer, value, deadline, CPV codes (honest null when the notice carries none) and the official notice link. Searches a 6-hourly refreshed index - no signup with either portal needed. Costs $0.05 USDC per call (x402, Base mainnet). Returns
| Parameter | Type | Required | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| q | string | no | Keywords, synonym-expanded (e.g. 'cleaning' also finds janitorial and hygiene services). At least one of q, cpv or region is required. |
| cpv | string | no | CPV code prefix filter, comma-separated (e.g. 909,45233). Notices without CPV codes are excluded and counted. |
| region | string | no | UK nation or English region: scotland, wales, northern-ireland, london, north-east, north-west, yorkshire, east-midlands, west-midlands, east-of-england, south-east, south-west, england. |
| value_min | integer | no | Minimum stated contract value in GBP. |
| value_max | integer | no | Maximum stated contract value in GBP. |
| deadline_after | string | no | Only notices whose submission deadline is on or after this date (YYYY-MM-DD). |
| stage | string | no | tender (open competitions, default both) or planning (early engagement). |
One tender as a full agent-ready dossier: parsed requirements summary, buyer, value, complete timeline with working-days-remaining, lots, document links, submission route and the official notice URL. CPV codes are null when the source release carries none - we report the register, we never guess. Costs $0.10 USDC per call (x402, Base mainnet). Returns: result = { ocid, title, buyer, value, stage,
| Parameter | Type | Required | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| ocid | string | yes | The OCDS contracting-process id, e.g. ocds-h6vhtk-06df8b (FTS) or ocds-b5fd17-… (Contracts Finder). Exactly as returned by /v1/tenders/search. |
Send a supplier profile (what you do, keywords, regions, value band, certifications) and get the best-fitting live UK tenders, each scored 0-100 by deterministic published rules across five factors - relevance, value fit, geography, timeline, buyer history - each with its numerator AND denominator so you can re-weight client-side, plus a what-to-emphasise note on the top matches. Rules score; a mo
| Parameter | Type | Required | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| supplier | object | yes | The supplier profile to match against live tenders. |
| filters | object | no | Optional pre-filters (same fields as /v1/tenders/search). |
| top | integer | no | — |
Live UK grant funding calls from GOV.UK Find a Grant in one call: name, funder, amount range, opening/closing dates, who can apply, one-line summary and the official source link. Filter by keywords, nation, applicant type and amount band. Indexed daily from the official listing - the service has no API of its own, so this is the machine-readable version. Costs $0.10 USDC per call (x402, Base main
| Parameter | Type | Required | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| q | string | no | Keywords matched against grant names, summaries, funders and descriptions (light stemming). At least one criterion is required. |
| region | string | no | UK nation: england, scotland, wales, northern-ireland (or uk for UK-wide only). |
| org_type | string | no | Applicant type: individual, business, charity, community_group, public_body, local_authority, education (synonyms like sole-trader, cic, council are mapped). |
| min | integer | no | Only grants whose maximum award is at least this many GBP. |
| max | integer | no | Only grants whose minimum award is at most this many GBP. |
| open_now | string | no | Default true: only grants currently open for applications. Set to false to include closed/not-yet-open listings. |
Send a project profile (what it is, who you are, where, how much you need) and get back the live UK grants it could actually get - ranked eligible-first with a per-criterion pass/fail table for every match, from criteria parsed once at ingest from each grant's own eligibility text. Ineligible grants are excluded and counted, never dressed up as options. Deterministic rules; no language model touch
| Parameter | Type | Required | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| project | object | yes | The project profile to match against live grants. |
| top | integer | no | — |
One grant, one project: a deterministic eligibility verdict with the full criteria table - each criterion quoted from the grant's own eligibility text, marked pass/fail/undeclared - plus what is missing to firm it up and indicative funding. Criteria are parsed once at ingest, never guessed at request time; if the full text is not parsed yet the verdict uses Find a Grant's listing fields, flagged P
| Parameter | Type | Required | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| id | string | yes | Grant id: the Find a Grant slug exactly as returned by /v1/grants/search (e.g. england-woodland-creation-offer-ewco-1), or a curated short alias like ewco. |
| org_type | string | no | Applicant type slug (individual, business, charity, community_group, public_body, local_authority, education). |
| region | string | no | Where the project is: england, scotland, wales, northern-ireland. |
| declare | object | no | Extra facts this grant's criteria ask for, as declared key/values (e.g. { "land_ha": 3.5, "management_control": true }). Each criterion names the parameter it reads, so a first call tells you what to |
Who actually funds things like yours: one UK funder's giving history aggregated from the 360Giving open-data corpus - grants made, total and typical award, size distribution, yearly pattern, most recent named awards - plus any of their grant schemes live on Find a Grant right now. Licences are respected per dataset (share-alike data is excluded from the numbers, and every recent-award row carries
| Parameter | Type | Required | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| name | string | yes | Funder name or slug, e.g. national-lottery-heritage-fund, "Esmée Fairbairn Foundation", or a GB-CHC-… org id. |
Free
$0 forever
- Every tool — any call limit is its publisher’s, not ours
- No card, and mcprush charges nothing for it
- Runs at its publisher’s own address — this marketplace is not in the path
- Nothing to cap, because mcprush bills nothing
What counts against your monthly calls
| Tool | Unit | Calls used | Out of the allowance |
|---|
Nothing here is billable: mcprush charges nothing to install ukintel.uk — UK company, tender and grant intelligence or to call it, at any volume.
Call allowance · this installenforced at the gateway
Monthly allowance, in calls
—
—
Alert at 80% · then the tool returns a normal MCP error
Used this month: —
ATool-list grade · score 96 / 100
Release 1.3.0 · scanned 20 Oct 2026
Graded from the tools this server lists, not from its source code.
Two independent axes, because powerful and malicious are different questions. The grade is threat only. The capability level is blast radius, and it is never a penalty on the grade — it is priced as one subtract-only term in the score, where you can see it.
Threat score100
Client score96
Findings0 threat · 0 capability
Capabilityminimal
Coveragemanifest
Verificationnot in this report
Surface digest1b54e9d23626be4d318270712aa1893d47bc84062b1bf9f9b34f643b1befcaae
Score vectorthreat 100 → client 96
| Term | Level | What it prices | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
| capability-exposure | minimal | capability blast radius (minimal) — client exposure if the model is manipulated | −0 |
| coverage-honesty | manifest | inspection depth (manifest) — how much of the target the scan could see | −4 |
score = clamp(round(threatScore − E_cap − E_ver − E_cov), 0, 100). No model, no opinion, no network call at scoring time: the same methodology version against the same bytes always produces this number, and every line above is a field of the report rather than a summary of it.
What the scan could actually read
A grade is only as meaningful as its coverage, so the scanner publishes its own depth before it publishes its result.
The scan read each tool’s name, description, input schema and annotations exactly as the server listed them the last time it answered us; no code was reviewed. We ask the server again about once a month, and a list that changed is graded again.
Tool surfaceread
Implementation sourcenot available
Package metadatanot available
Live transportnot available
The implementation source was not read — this reflects the declared tool metadata only.
Capability — what it could do if the model were manipulated
Tags derived from each tool’s schema and the implementation, not from what the tool calls itself. minimal is the level these add up to.
| Tool | Capability tags | Why the tag was assigned |
|---|---|---|
| uk_preview | no tags | |
| uk_health | no tags | |
| uk_company_search | no tags | |
| uk_company_profile | no tags | |
| uk_company_verdict | no tags | |
| uk_company_fca | no tags | |
| uk_tenders_search | no tags | |
| uk_tender_brief | no tags | |
| uk_tenders_fit_score | no tags | |
| uk_grants_search | no tags | |
| uk_grants_match | no tags | |
| uk_grant_eligibility | no tags | |
| uk_funder_dossier | no tags |
Toxic-flow graph
The lethal trifecta, checked as a graph rather than as a checklist: untrusted input, a sensitive source and an external sink have to meet before there is a path worth worrying about.
The public result for this release does not print the flow graph, so there is nothing to show here. That is not the same as "no paths were found": what the scan did read is above, under coverage.
Supply chain and provenance
Integrityfirst-seen
Surface digest1b54e9d23626be4d
Scanned2026-10-20
This is the first scan of this surface here, so there is nothing yet to compare it against.
Every result on this tab comes from one deterministic pass over the published package — offline, rule by rule, and auditable line by line above. Same methodology version, same bytes, same score.
Release history
This is an address its publisher runs: which release it serves is theirs to choose, so there is nothing here to pin. The history below is for reading; the current release on file is 1.3.0.
1.3.0
undated
latestNo release note was published with this version.
—
no reviews yet
Who can review
One review per account, from a signed-in account that does not publish this listing. Nothing else is asked — you can say what you think before you install it. Publishers can reply once per review, and a review can be edited or deleted by whoever wrote it.
Sign in to write one
Any signed-in account that does not publish ukintel.uk — UK company, tender and grant intelligence can review it, once — before installing it or after. A review from an account that has installed it is marked as one.
No reviews yet
Nobody has reviewed this listing. The rating on the card is the mean of the reviews written here and nothing else, so there is no rating until somebody writes the first — which takes a signed-in account that does not publish it, and nothing else.