Control a real Chrome browser to complete any task: fill forms, extract data, book flights.
Nothing to run from here
ZennoDroid: device in ProjectMaker is installed from its publisher's own source and answers where it runs, so this marketplace is not in the path of a single call. There is no address here to send one to, and a panel that pretended otherwise would be showing you an answer we made up. Install it and call it from your own client — the Installation tab has the entry for each one.
91/100
trust score
—
calls last 7d
local
runs on your machine
—
p95 latency
What it does
Drive the Android device attached to ZennoDroid ProjectMaker: screen, elements, apps, gestures.
Quickstart
# 1 — add it to Claude Code
claude mcp add --scope user --transport http zennodroid-device-in-projectmaker-mcp http://localhost:6210
The address is on your own machine or network: it answers only once you start the server there, the way its own source says, and a hosted client cannot reach it.
ZennoDroid: device in ProjectMaker costs nothing on mcprush: there is no plan to choose here, no cap to set and nothing mcprush can bill you for.
Publishernot claimed
ZEAll 2 servers
zennolab2 servers
1 category
Collected from a public index. Nobody has claimed this account, so nothing here was written by its author — claim it if it is yours.
Installation
Where are you running it?
Every route below installs the same thing and ends at the same approval screen. This one answers at an address on your own machine: you start ZennoDroid: device in ProjectMaker yourself, the way its own source says, and your client connects to it there — with your files and your network in its reach. Its scan result is on the Security tab.
Claude Codedeclared by this listing
This is a public server: you run it yourself and this marketplace is not in the path. The address is on your own machine or network: it answers only once you start the server there, the way its own source says, and a hosted client cannot reach it. Claude Code registers it in one command; --scope user makes it available in every project. The transport below is http, as the publisher's own manifest declares it.
claude mcp add --scope user --transport http zennodroid-device-in-projectmaker-mcp http://localhost:6210Reconnect, or start a new session, and the tools appear in the model’s tool list.
Free on mcprush, and it answers at an address on your own machine: this marketplace is not in the path, so there is no key of ours to hold and no card to add.
What it writes
One config entry pointing at an address on your own machine, where you start the server yourself — this marketplace is not in the path, and the server runs with your file system and your network.
What you approve
This listing has not published its tool surface here yet, so what a client will ask you to approve is whatever the manifest declares at install time.
Tool surface
What the model actually sees. Descriptions are diffed on every release — see version history.
No tool surface on file
This listing has not published its tool list here yet. Nothing is shown here rather than another listing’s tools, which is what this page used to do.
Free
$0 forever
- Every tool, no call limit
- No card, and mcprush charges nothing for it
- Source published under MIT
- Runs on your machine — nothing of it reaches our gateway
- Nothing to cap, because mcprush bills nothing
What counts against your monthly calls
| Tool | Unit | Calls used | Out of the allowance |
|---|
Nothing here is billable: mcprush charges nothing to install ZennoDroid: device in ProjectMaker or to call it, at any volume.
Call allowance · this installenforced at the gateway
Monthly allowance, in calls
—
—
Alert at 80% · then the tool returns a normal MCP error
Used this month: —
ATrust score 91 / 100
Release 0.5.0 · scanned 10 Oct 2026
Two independent axes, because powerful and malicious are different questions. The grade is threat only. The capability level is blast radius, and it is never a penalty on the grade — it is priced as one subtract-only term in the score, where you can see it.
Threat score100
Client score91
Findings1 threat · 0 capability
Capabilityminimal
Coveragemetadata
Verificationrepo
Surface digest2dc22d3bf39daa3966da07121ef3ae7218597d0cc75600bd6ac9471b4c82a657
Score vectorthreat 100 → client 91
| Term | Level | What it prices | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
| capability-exposure | minimal | capability blast radius (minimal) — client exposure if the model is manipulated | −0 |
| verification-discount | repo | publisher verification (public source) — no provenance, but the source is public and inspectable | −1 |
| coverage-honesty | metadata | inspection depth (metadata) — how much of the target the scan could see | −8 |
score = clamp(round(threatScore − E_cap − E_ver − E_cov), 0, 100). No model, no opinion, no network call at scoring time: the same methodology version against the same bytes always produces this number, and every line above is a field of the report rather than a summary of it.
What the scan could actually read
A grade is only as meaningful as its coverage, so the scanner publishes its own depth before it publishes its result.
Tool surfacenot available
Implementation sourcenot available
Package metadataread
Live transportnot available
No tools were enumerated, so prompt-injection, capability and toxic-flow analysis had no tool surface to inspect. To grade a package’s real runtime tools, scan the running server: --command "npx -y <package>".
Capability — what it could do if the model were manipulated
Tags derived from each tool’s schema and the implementation, not from what the tool calls itself. minimal is the level these add up to.
| Tool | Capability tags | Why the tag was assigned |
|---|---|---|
| No per-tool rows for this release — see the note below. | ||
No tool surface was enumerated, so there is nothing to attribute a capability to.
Toxic-flow graph
The lethal trifecta, checked as a graph rather than as a checklist: untrusted input, a sensitive source and an external sink have to meet before there is a path worth worrying about.
The public result for this release does not print the flow graph, so there is nothing to show here. That is not the same as "no paths were found": what the scan did read is above, under coverage.
Supply chain and provenance
Integrityfirst-seen
Surface digest2dc22d3bf39daa39
Scanned2026-10-10
This is the first scan of this surface here, so there is nothing yet to compare it against.
Every result on this tab comes from one deterministic pass over the published package — offline, rule by rule, and auditable line by line above. Same methodology version, same bytes, same score.
Release history
It answers at an address on your own machine, running whatever release you started there — so a release cannot be chosen from here. The history below is for reading; the current release on file is 0.5.0.
0.5.0
undated
latestNo release note was published with this version.
—
no reviews yet
Who can review
One review per account, from a signed-in account that does not publish this listing. Nothing else is asked — you can say what you think before you install it. Publishers can reply once per review, and a review can be edited or deleted by whoever wrote it.
Sign in to write one
Any signed-in account that does not publish ZennoDroid: device in ProjectMaker can review it, once — before installing it or after. A review from an account that has installed it is marked as one.
No reviews yet
Nobody has reviewed this listing. The rating on the card is the mean of the reviews written here and nothing else, so there is no rating until somebody writes the first — which takes a signed-in account that does not publish it, and nothing else.