Use when calibrating expectations for the Journal of Consumer Psychology (JCP) review cycle — desk-screen odds, the area-editor/reviewer…
Use when navigating the Journal of Economic Growth (JEG) editorial process — the Springer Nature submission path, editor screening for…
Use when calibrating expectations for the Journal of Public Policy & Marketing (JPP&M) review cycle — desk-screen logic, the mixed…
Use when understanding or planning for Production and Operations Management (POM) review — Department Editor screening, double-blind…
Use when you need to understand how Population and Development Review (PDR, Wiley / Population Council) evaluates a manuscript — an…
Use when calibrating expectations for the Review of Accounting Studies (RAST) review cycle — its fast, first-round-decision culture…
Review and approve (or reject) pending playbook update proposals from the playbook-monitor agent and apply approved changes to the…
Systematic review response workflow from comment analysis to professional rebuttal writing.
Universal review with narrative verdicts for consistent quality gates before and after implementation. 6 parallel reviewers: 2 internal…
Review technical spec documents from completeness, feasibility, risk, and code consistency perspectives.
User-invoked interface review of a change rather than a screen: uncommitted work, the current branch, or a pull request.
User-invoked, cross-discipline interface review that coordinates better-accessibility, better-layout, better-writing, better-typography…
Post-implementation review orchestrator.
Use after PNAS Nexus reviews arrive to triage the decision, prioritize experiments, and draft a point-by-point response that is…
Use when reviewing a pull request or a change in this repository — orients the reviewer to this repository's standards (AGENTS.md…
Use when judging whether an implementation plan matches its PRD, issuing PASS or FAIL only, checking for invented product, or when the…
Reviews animation and motion code against a high craft bar derived from Emil Kowalski's design engineering philosophy.
Systematically evaluate code changes for security, correctness, performance, and spec alignment.
Use when reviewing code under Codex — verifying spec compliance, conducting quality review after a build, or checking that an…
Show the review status of open PRs across my work, my team's sprint, and my scrum members, cross-referenced with RHOAIENG Jira issues.
Audit, co-review, revise, and deliver an existing evidence-backed research, technical, analytical, project, or briefing report.