Use when understanding and navigating Administrative Science Quarterly's (ASQ) developmental, multi-round review process — decision types…
Use when you want to understand how Organization Science review and decisions work before or after submitting — the decentralized…
Use when you need to understand how Public Administration Review (PAR) evaluates a manuscript — double-blind review, desk screening for…
Use to understand how Social Psychology Quarterly (SPQ) evaluates a manuscript — masked (blinded) review, the blinding check that…
Use to understand how World Politics evaluates a manuscript — triple-blind review with author anonymity preserved through the editorial…
Run the R code review protocol on R scripts.
Systematic review response workflow from comment analysis to professional rebuttal writing.
Systematic review response workflow from comment analysis to professional rebuttal writing.
Analyzes feedback logs to identify patterns and suggest improvements to review skills.
Review a proposed Agent Skill for structural validity and content quality before publishing.
Review and analyze a skill against best practices for length, intent scope, and trigger patterns
This skill should be used when the user asks to "review page", "stamp as reviewed", "mark reviewed", "review documentation", "add review…
Aggregate multi-reviewer feedback into consolidated, prioritized, and actionable recommendations
Multi-agent code review for Rust CLI/TUI.
Mandatory verification steps for all code reviews to reduce false positives.
Review code changes, a plan, a live page (running dev server), or a local HTML file with Crit inline comments and structured human feedback.
Use after Cell reviews arrive to triage the decision, prioritize the (often substantial) new experiments by impact × feasibility, and…
Use after Lancet reviews arrive (including the statistical reviewer and the editor's letter) to triage the decision, answer statistical…
Use after Molecular Cell reviews arrive to triage the decision, prioritize the (often mechanism-completing) new experiments by impact ×…
Use after Science reviews arrive to triage the decision, prioritize experiments, and draft a point-by-point response that is respectful…
Use when judging whether an implementation plan matches its PRD, issuing PASS or FAIL only, checking for invented product, or when the…