Communication & Collaboration Agent Skills for Claude Code

Executes an iterative code review and self-correction loop using sub-agents to critique diffs and fix confirmed issues.

Sends your own plan, diff, or design out to independent external models (Codex, Gemini, optionally a fresh Claude) to find what you MISSED…

Review technical, architectural, migration, implementation, or refactoring plans by first asking product-level questions that resolve…

Review the current branch for code quality, security, and Rails 8 conventions compliance.

Produces a completion summary of a code-review session — what was resolved, skipped, and postponed — for a downstream consumer such as a…

Read this codebase and write, or sharpen, a review skill fitted to it.

Run two independent Codex-internal reviews of documents, markdown, specs, plans, source code, diffs, or implementation files with gpt-5.5…

Plan commits as reviewable work units. Trigger: implementation, commit splitting, chained PRs, or keeping tests and docs with code.

Review one task diff or aggregate Change through owner-selected independent lenses, synthesize file-backed findings, and perform…

Quality gate: verify each acceptance criterion of a completed task/work unit, run quality checks, and create follow-up tasks for gaps.

Use when reviewing a pull request or a change in this repository — orients the reviewer to this repository's standards (AGENTS.md…

Generic, repo-agnostic PR review methodology — use this whenever reviewing a pull request in any repo, whether that's an autonomous…

Fires before a plan is accepted or a diff merged when its size, layer count, or abstraction budget is in question — and at the moment…

Use when asked to review a code change (diff, branch, or PR) for merge readiness and collaborate asynchronously with another agent (often…

Show the review status of open PRs across my work, my team's sprint, and my scrum members, cross-referenced with RHOAIENG Jira issues.

Use the Revset stacked code-review CLI (revset inbox, pr view, pr diff, threads, comments, request-changes).

Review any artifact — a PRD, design doc, launch/rollout plan, or PR — the way Richard would: organized, detail-obsessed, critical-thinking.

RingCentral automation via Rube MCP -- toolkit not currently available in Composio; no RING_CENTRAL_ tools found

Surface risks through guided questioning, helping users consider pivots, constraints, and prioritization during PRD v0.5 Red Team Review.

Guides building Now/Next/Later, outcome-based roadmaps and communicating tradeoff decisions to stakeholders who push for a specific…

Use only when the user explicitly invokes /roborev-design-review