Learning & Documentation Agent Skills for Cursor

Use when designing or auditing a PLDI evaluation — choosing defensible benchmark suites and baseline compiler configurations, measuring…

Use when positioning a PLDI paper against the SIGPLAN family and systems neighbors — stating technical deltas per cited line, covering the…

Use when interpreting PLDI's review pipeline — double-blind HotCRP reviewing by a PL-implementor PC, the February author-response window…

Use when deciding what accompanies a PLDI submission beyond the 20 text pages — full proofs, extended benchmark data, anonymized code…

Use when deciding whether a project is PLDI-shaped — implementation insight with benchmark-grade evidence — or better routed inside the…

Use when revising a PLDI draft for the venue's voice — design insight before tool name, mechanisms instead of adjectives, a running…

Use when targeting PMLA (Publications of the Modern Language Association) or deciding whether a literary- or language-studies manuscript…

Use when an author expects an artifact-evaluation or badge track at ACM PODC and needs redirecting — PODC has NO artifact track and no ACM…

Use when building the evidence for an ACM PODC paper — where "evidence" is a proof, not a benchmark.

Use when writing the related-work and positioning of an ACM PODC paper — covering the distributed-computing literature lanes…

Use when making an ACM PODC paper's result independently checkable — reproducibility for a proofs venue, not an artifact venue.

Use when reasoning about how an ACM PODC submission is evaluated — covering lightweight double-blind review, a program committee that…

Use when deciding whether a distributed-computing result belongs at ACM PODC or should be routed to DISC, SPAA, OPODIS/SIROCCO/SSS…

Use when drafting or revising the body of an ACM PODC paper — building the distributed-theory skeleton (an explicit model box, the result…

Transforms podcast or video transcripts into structured show notes with timestamps, key takeaways, resource links, guest bios, pull…

Use for the PODS analogue of artifact evaluation — there is no systems artifact track at this theory symposium, so this skill covers…

Use when drafting ACM PODS author responses, covering the short ~48-hour double-anonymous rebuttal that corrects misreadings of proofs and…

Use when positioning an ACM PODS submission against the database-theory literature across PODS, ICDT, LICS, and the journals (TODS, LMCS…

Use when strengthening the verifiability of an ACM PODS paper — a complete claim-to-proof map, self-contained proofs in the at-submission…

Use when reasoning about how an ACM PODS submission is evaluated, covering lightweight double-anonymous review, the multi-cycle-per-year…

Use when deciding what belongs in an ACM PODS paper body versus its at-submission appendix, covering the acmsmall 15-page budget, the rule…