User-invoked, cross-discipline interface review that coordinates better-accessibility, better-layout, better-writing, better-typography…
Post-implementation review orchestrator.
# Review Writing — A Methodology for Writing Academic Reviews Section by Section
Use after PNAS Nexus reviews arrive to triage the decision, prioritize experiments, and draft a point-by-point response that is…
Use when reviewing a pull request or a change in this repository — orients the reviewer to this repository's standards (AGENTS.md…
Use when judging whether an implementation plan matches its PRD, issuing PASS or FAIL only, checking for invented product, or when the…
Reviews AI-written code with the human as the reviewer, so they build design and review judgment rather than accepting output unread.
Reviews animation and motion code against a high craft bar derived from Emil Kowalski's design engineering philosophy.
Use when the user shares an architectural floor plan (PDF, image, or CAD export) and asks for a review, feedback, or code-compliance check…
Actionable feedback on the quality, usage, and effectiveness of Power BI reports.
Use when judging whether this cut's code meets the PRD with evidence in the repo, issuing PASS or FAIL only, checking for work outside the…
Use when a decision letter/referee reports arrive for a Journal of the American Chemical Society (JACS) manuscript, to plan experiments…
Use when responding to Journal of Economic Perspectives (JEP) editor feedback — accessibility, balance, length, and framing — on an…
Use when writing the response to an Environmental Science & Technology (ES&T) revision decision.
Use when writing the response to a Global Change Biology (GCB) revise decision.
Use when writing the response to a Global Environmental Change (GEC) revise decision.
Use when responding to a Journal of Consumer Research (JCR) revise-and-resubmit — planning the revision, running new studies or analyses…
Use when responding to a Progress in Human Geography (PiHG) decision letter (major/minor revision) — building a point-by-point response to…
Use when a Psychological Review decision letter (usually a major revision) has arrived and you must write the response document and revise…
Use when responding to a Perspectives on Psychological Science (PoPS) editor and reviewer decision letter — coverage gaps…
Use when responding to editor and referee feedback on a Journal of Economic Literature (JEL) survey — coverage gaps, balance complaints…